... Then go play etrian odyssey?
The persona q games weren't inspired by persona 1/2 at all, they're Etrian Odyssey games with a persona skin. That's where the Q in the title comes from (only makes sense in the Japanese), but I'm guessing you already know this.
Yeah...and what's stopping them from making that 2/7?But Eternal Punishment is the only game with adult characters. That's 1/6 mainline games.
That's the same score I was expecting Persona 5 Royal to get after reading the import thread.
You can dress it up all you want but it's still very clearly a mousou game. Like, you can't argue against that lol.
The way I view it is. If I knew nothing about persona, but as a fan of musou games still got this one, would I be disapointed? Answer is , yes. Just like I was very disappointed in Dragon Quest Heroes.
Sure, musou doesn't have to be completely rigid in it's structure, that'd be awful. But there's a limit until it becomes something else. Dragon Quest Heroes pushed beyond that limit to me, and Strikers pushes WAY WAY farther.
It's not a musou despite having similar combat for the same reason GTA V is not a forza style racing game despite having driving mechanics.
According to some of you, Musou might as well be a meaninguless genre. Since apaprently it has no identifiable features. You can literally remove BASICALLY ALL of THEM and it's still somehow musou
This game has no battlefileds
No army vs army
no base capturing
no strategy elements of any kind
no large roster of characters
At this point I don't even know what a musou is to you people.. is it just [][]/\ combos? CUz there are musous without those... are those not musous?
In comparison P5S doesn't have the typical Musou missions except for some sidequests and even there it's not really Musou where as DQH and AoC still have a lot of that. P5S is more an action RPG as you said. It's what would have happened if they took P5 to that direction and stopped turn based combat.
Well if you played the vanilla version of P5 on console you're all set for this one since Strikers doesn't reference any of the additional content from Royal at all.Oh, I didn't know it was an actual sequel, story-wise. It looks much better than your typical musou(which I hate), going to wishlist it and maybe play it if/when P5R comes to PC.
That's the same score I was expecting Persona 5 Royal to get after reading the import thread.
Agree, but I think people just spect 95+ from anything P5.Weird characterization in this thread that the review scores are disappointing? They look pretty good to me.
Oh lol, so royal ain't canon?Well if you played the vanilla version of P5 on console you're all set for this one since Strikers doesn't reference any of the additional content from Royal at all.
If striker ignores all the extra content and its a sequel...
Strikers never directly contradicts anything in Royal. The problem is that Strikes was made concurrently with Royal.
My opinion is that Dragon Quest Heroes, Persona 5 Strikers, and Age of Calamity blur the line between "a pure musou" and ARPG to varying degrees.
In the end the labels are just labels.
Yes it is, but P5 isn't on PC either and this game is coming to Steam.Kind of crazy that P5 is not on Switch. This is a direct sequel to 5, right?
The story in all the Persona spin-offs are trash so I wouldn't worry about it too much. That's not what you play them for.
I knew I was forgetting one of the RPG sites! I'm sorry, I just added it.
Persona 4 Arena made no mention of anything that was added to Golden, then Arena Ultimax came out and brought aspects of Golden in with no mention of why they weren't in the first game.
I'm...actually really shocked this hasn't happened yet. Would buy the shit out of this.
My only theory is they are saving it for some reason. It absolutely must have been pitched at one point and I think it's inevitable (and has the potential to be the best musou of all time)