RAM aside, even the difference in the GPU's between min and recommended is pretty big.
I've got 64GiB of RAM, but 32GiB is probably the sweetspot, so why wouldn't you? Now is a pretty good time for it too, prices have come down.
It's 'recommended' not 'required'. If they have found a way to make good use of additional resources, that's great! Memory should be used!
(Before someone chimes in with how "nothing uses ..." make sure you understand virtual memory and buffer caches.)
My gtx 970, 16 gigs of ram, and 1440p monitor will stay strong for another year.
This has to be a mistake.
(Just spent $1500 on a new PC that doesn't even make rec specs for new games. Feels bad.)
The minimum is basically a PS4/XB1.
Shit, aside from ray tracing the recommended is basically a PS5/XB4.
lmao
What part of a $1500 PC doesn't meet these specs? You mean the ram? Because everything else should be no problem at that price. The only reason nobody put in 32GB in systems isn't because of price, it's because nothing requires it.
Surely the PS4 GPU is a bit stronger than a 650 right ?
The disparity between Min and Recommended is pretty big regardless and I think most people will be able to play it at 1080p/60 FPS pretty easily. Most games have pretty bloated recommended requirements anyway. I won't count on most people having issues running this at higher presets.