www.cnn.com
"See?! The radical left have no regard for safety or the law! We need MORE police funding NOW, and non-lenient prison sentences. We gotta stomp out crime to take back our country!"
yes, but not in relation to this!!
you don't know why people like to drive in a beautiful part of the country?
No, she shouldn't be held responsible for what her husband does, but please god just retire. I honestly feel like if she were to announce her retirement in advance it would boost the Dem voter turnout this fall.
He could lose his license which would probably be good for everyone
I think it would help if folks knew that something... anything is actually going to change if the Dems keep their majority. A Speaker who recognizes that the GOP of today is not the same GOP of 50 years ago would be a hugely helpful start.
This is kind of the wrong thread for this kind of debate but the Dems have a leadership and messaging problem that extends to the House. Can we agree that in light of the current state of the country going out there endorsing anti-choice/NRA endorsed Dems and saying the USA needs a strong GOP is not what the average Dem voter wants to hear from their Speaker right now? I have a ton of respect for what she accomplished during the totality of her career both as a rep and speaker but she's not the leader we need right now. She seems stuck in another era, an era when we weren't all in extreme danger.
Do you have any data to back that up? I doubt the average Democratic voter feels particularly strong on the endorsement of one House member, and I think most Dems probably do support "bipartisanship."
…how?
We have polling data that shows the public split 46%/46% of voting intention (well... at least that last poll I saw) but yet an overwhelming percentage said they felt the country was heading in the wrong direction. Since a large percentage of Dems would have to be included in that number I would guess that a lot of Dems aren't thrilled with the current leadership of the country.
It's a Pelosi and it's a DUI. How is this difficult?
I mean, that's not what you said. You said:
And no, I don't think we can agree with that without any data to back it up. I would like it to be the case, but I don't think we have any reason to think it is.
It's not going to hurt her in her district, and relatives getting DUIs (or even candidates themselves) doesn't really have a meaningful track record of hurting an entire party.
