Especially in The Crew 2, everytime I play that game I wonder why we need ray tracing. That game looks beautiful with it's faked tracing.
Someone could correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this is pathtracing done in screenspace which is definitely much less expensive than full on raytracing which gets information even from things not visible by the camera.
Its also a shitty hacky screenspace solution. you would need to build a game from the ground up for it otherwise the results will be minimum at best.
Reshade is faking it's ray tracing too, that's why it doesn't look that amazing, real ray tracing like RTX will be a game changer if it becomes a thing next gen.
This is not actual raytracing, it will work on any gpu. Can't speak on performance, but I think it's also still in development so may not be fully optimized yet
I can definitely see it in 3:50 (I like the glow on the rocks and bones, which gives the scene better depth), but 4:35 just looks like the scene is brighter. My eyes apparently may need more training to see what I should be seeing. LOL
Noice thanks, wonder if this is heavy on performance but since it's not actual raytracing shouldn't be
yep
This isn't tied to CEMU, it's a general shader that can be applied to nearly any modern PC game/emulator
Well, global illumination is literally bouncing light off of surfaces, so not sure what you would expect...also it's fully adjustable.
Yeah when it's done via Reshade that's pretty much how I feel.
These shader things usually look worse than the actual game
I'd disagree. But regardless, just think how much time devs will save not having to bake lighting in future.
