• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Korigama

Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,513
Yet another desperate remake nobody asked for guaranteed to have a worse cast and be drained of everything that made the original film enjoyable or memorable, just like the modernized Total Recall and RoboCop before it.
They make alot of sense. No one who isn't in their 30's or older is watching 1997's Face/Off. They have a property, and a potential to make alot of money on an already proven film theme and story, and they are going to make money off it. Pretty simple.
Everybody under 30 suddenly just stopped watching any and every movie from the '90s or older now?
 

AuthenticM

Son Altesse Sérénissime
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
30,085
This is so dumb. There is massive potential to make a prestige TV series out of this, but a remake? There is really no need for this. The original movie is fucking perfect.
 

Tansut

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Dec 16, 2017
2,465
The original is so well-known and fondly remembered exclusively because of the cast and crew involved and the time in which it was made. There is nothing that can be remade or replicated from this that won't cause ire and unfavorable comparisons.

Talk about a doomed project.
 

Hyun Sai

Member
Oct 27, 2017
14,562
There are so many over the top and stylish scenes like this, I can't even understand how they will do a remake... Good luck !

 

Liquor

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,715
Yet another desperate remake nobody asked for guaranteed to have a worse cast and be drained of everything that made the original film enjoyable or memorable, just like the modernized Total Recall and RoboCop before it.

Everybody under 30 suddenly just stopped watching any and every movie from the '90s or older now?
I mean, let's not bullshit here. They will make way more money remaking this than... not.

Unless somehow you think hey are killing it on DVD sales on the aftermarket.
 

Dust

C H A O S
Member
Oct 25, 2017
32,283
Of all movies, Face Off?
Do they have a giant board with random movies on it and just throw darts at it?
 

Ryuhza

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
11,440
San Diego County
Why try?
nicolas-cage-shrug.gif
 

Strike

Member
Oct 25, 2017
27,361
Doubt it will be anywhere near as memorable or over the top as the original.
 
Last edited:

Dalek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
38,962
Face/Off was a fucked up movie.

Didn't Troy sleep with Archer's wife-with her thinking it was her husband?
 

El Bombastico

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
36,050
The only way I can see this working is if the recast Cage and Travolta, except this time Cage is originally the FBI agent and Travolta the terrorist.
 

Sankara

Alt Account
Banned
May 19, 2019
1,311
Paris
capitalism is in such a rot - "The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born, in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear."
 

Seesaw15

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,819
Eh, I don't see the problem. If this gives studios an excuse to hire two zany actors to play off of each other and be campy then make 20 of them.

The original is fun but its not some sacred text.
 

grang

Member
Nov 13, 2017
10,072
Why are people ITT only suggesting actor pairs that look alike? Nic Cage and John Travolta don't look alike at all...right? Or am I crazy?
 

DiipuSurotu

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
53,148
That has never been the case. Remakes have existed for a long-ass time and very few of them are actually redoing the same film. Reboots are for series.
Wrong. You want to apply hard definitions on things that just aren't hard science. Because wouldn't it be nice if all those terms had clear definitions that didn't overlap? But it just isn't the case. Reboot is a looser term than remake.

See for example:


"Netflix's new Dark Crystal reboot reaches back to the gentle fantasy of Fraggle Rock"
 

Jon Carter

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
5,746
Wrong. You want to apply hard definitions on things that just aren't hard science. Because wouldn't it be nice if all those terms had clear definitions that didn't overlap? But it just isn't the case. Reboot is a looser term than remake.

See for example:


"Netflix's new Dark Crystal reboot reaches back to the gentle fantasy of Fraggle Rock"

??? That's a series. If it were a movie then it would be a remake.
 

Jon Carter

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
5,746
The Netflix is a series, not the original Dark Crystal.

Yes, the reboot is a series. Actually the correct term would be prequel series and prequel if it were a film, but it still fits the definition of reboot. A stand-alone film based on another stand-alone film without the two being connected is a remake, no matter whether they are shot-for-shot or not. This is the case here.

With the exception of shot-for-shot remakes, most remakes make significant character, plot, genre and theme changes. For example, the 1968 film The Thomas Crown Affair is centered on a bank robbery, while its 1999 remake involves the theft of a valuable piece of artwork. The 1999 remake of The Mummy was viewed primarily as "a reimagining" in a different genre (adventure). Similarly, when the 1969 film The Italian Job was remade in 2003, few aspects were carried over. Another example is the 1932 film Scarface which was remade in 1983 starring Al Pacino; whereas the setting of 1932 version is the illegal alcohol trade, the characters in the 1983 version are involved in cocaine smuggling.
 

El Goom

Member
Oct 27, 2017
263
Wasn't the original idea supposed to be with Stallone/Schwarzenegger? I'd still watch that
 

SArcher

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
2,669
Was it ever explained how their voices and body types also changed?