There is no evidence. NADA. ZILCH. ZERO. Period.My fear is that all this misinformation might be enough to sway an electorate to change their states vote and create major fuckery. Imagine the electorate official being a Trumper and saving dear leader....
Someone reassure me. Does anyone see trump's fraud lawsuits going to the supreme court too pull off some fuckery in his favor?
By saying he has 71,000,000 votes, he's confirming the legitimacy of all the mail in ballots.
He's lost 11 of 11 election lawsuits so far. His court attempts aren't going anywhereSomeone reassure me. Does anyone see trump's fraud lawsuits going to the supreme court too pull off some fuckery in his favor?
They can't. Supreme Court decision. A lower court would use the decision to stop any concentrated effort to change an electors vote from the state's public voteMy fear is that all this misinformation might be enough to sway an electorate to change their states vote and create major fuckery. Imagine the electorate official being a Trumper and saving dear leader....
The state that went through with it would face years of civil unrest. It wouldn't be worth it to them.He
He doesn't care about that. Winning puts him in the clear of the indictment that is waiting in New York. If he somehow gets his way and 4 more years he will be out of the statute of limitations for time to be charged.
January 20th is the inauguration, so my guess is you should expect that thread on January 21st.
Why start now?
They were talking about this possibility on NBC yesterday or the day before that the electorate doesn't have to go along with their states vote. They didn't think it was likely but they clearly said it was possible. Didn't mention that there was any Supreme Court ruling preventing it from happening.They can't. Supreme Court decision. A lower court would use the decision to stop any concentrated effort to change an electors vote from the state's public vote
5) There needs to actually be something meaningful for the courts to fix or alleviate. And since Biden is on tract to win more than enough states, a case for (let's say) Wisconsin would get thrown out because Biden would win even without the Wisconsin electoral votes1) His legal team is made up of a bunch of incompetent chumps
2) He's 0-8 in lawsuits
3) He needs a legal theory of the case or specific evidence of voter fraud and he has none
4) Just cause he's POTUS doesn't mean his lawsuits can go to SCOTUS
There aren't going to be any faithless electors.They were talking about this possibility on NBC yesterday or the day before that the electorate doesn't have to go along with their states vote. They didn't think it was likely but they clearly said it was possible. Didn't mention that there was any Supreme Court ruling preventing it from happening.
Indeed. And on that note:
There were 6 in 2016, the most ever. The Supreme Court ruling that the other poster was talking about was probably the ruling that states can create laws that force the electorate to vote in good faith and a bunch have.
By saying he has 71,000,000 votes, he's confirming the legitimacy of all the mail in ballots.
Man this is just sad. Sad and dangerous, lets hope his army of morons dont do anything stupid.
Just the thought of the fact that this all-in-cap stable genius holds the nuclear key is ... *shudders*