I think that we are making progress towards a multi-exclusivity landscape here.
I am not sure that I like the direction that these stores are going towards. Just imagine Steam decides to follow suit....
Don't forget about payoff requirements to influencers. That needs to be added to marketing costs and the cut.Can we stop just calculating figures based on 12% and 30% please. Differences in sales volume, Steam's variable cut, and Steam taking 0% from external keys all make such comparisons massively misleading.
I would even argue that some people here make such misleading arguments deliberately.
Anyway. This one fucking hurts. I was really looking forward to this after seeing it in the Kinda Funny Showcase. Oh well.
We should get upset at that. However considering Epic started this bullshit and Valve has to respond, I don't know.Genuinely curious: what happens when Valve pays for Steam exclusivity? Do we get upset at that, or not because we like valve?
For the record I've purchased probably around 50+ Steam titles and 0 EGS stuff. I'm not an "Epic shill", but I really don't see the big deal.
You are asking answers for a scenario that hasn't happened yet. So you tell us your detailed reponse since it's your hypothetical.Genuinely curious: what happens when Valve pays for Steam exclusivity? Do we get upset at that, or not because we like valve?
For the record I've purchased probably around 50+ Steam titles and 0 EGS stuff. I'm not an "Epic shill", but I really don't see the big deal.
You are asking answers for a scenario that has never happened. So you tell me.
Can we move on and talk about the actual game now?
It looks really good, old school first person dungeon crawler filled to the brim with puzzles etc. There's not too much like this out there at the moment and it looks like it's going to fill that gap quite nicely for me.
It's a shitty move no matter who pulls it. Unless it comes with free hats. Then it's OK.I'm asking for the inevitable. If it's so easy to jump on evil megacorporation #1, why not evil megacorporation #2?
it doesnt. That's why they are offering moneyhats to begin with. If the cut was enough, then it would be enough.Appreciate the attempt at simplification but I'm good in math. Also those hypothetical numbers seem very....hypothetical. It's fine to have theories and opinions....but you are presenting theories as facts to support an opinion.
Question is the same. The split doesn't matter even though it's all about money?
MIKE ALREADY KNEW!
I'm asking for the inevitable. If it's so easy to jump on evil megacorporation #1, why not evil megacorporation #2?
You assume microsoft doesn't know what deals or details is made for the non windows PC version.
I'm asking for the inevitable. If it's so easy to jump on evil megacorporation #1, why not evil megacorporation #2?
Can we move on and talk about the actual game now?
It looks really good, old school first person dungeon crawler filled to the brim with puzzles etc. There's not too much like this out there at the moment and it looks like it's going to fill that gap quite nicely for me.
It's ironic, as this kind of game wouldn't have gone to have 7 pages of discussion on Era if it wasn't because the Epic news.
Nah, it's coming to Game Pass. It would get noticed.It's ironic, as this kind of game wouldn't have gone to have 7 pages of discussion on Era if it wasn't because the Epic news.
You're right, I did miss that. Didn't know it became a fact. Wish I was an insider like everyone else here. /s
From what I remember reading in a epic store topic a month or so ago (sorry I can't find the source :( ), the "moneyhatting" works this way: if Epic projects your game would sell a hundred thousand copies on PC in its first year, they pay the respective amount upfront for exclusivity. If you sell more on EGS, they pay you the difference. If you sell less, you get to keep the extra money. So it's a really good deal if you're not sure your game will succeed, no wonder so many devs accept it.
We get upset. Payed 3rd party exclusivity on PC is bullshit no matter who does it.Genuinely curious: what happens when Valve pays for Steam exclusivity? Do we get upset at that, or not because we like valve?
Don't give them any ideas!Why wait? You'll be using the EGS or W10 store by then when T2 announce exclusivity for RD1 and RD2.
I really don't want to see Valve following suit in this shit because yeah, I would be pissed. I don't want this to become the norm.Genuinely curious: what happens when Valve pays for Steam exclusivity? Do we get upset at that, or not because we like valve?
For the record I've purchased probably around 50+ Steam titles and 0 EGS stuff. I'm not an "Epic shill", but I really don't see the big deal.
Whew. Not a good look at all.Another developer who used Steam Features and then pulled game from Steam. Beta for this game was conducted on Steam. Also game was explicitly announced for Steam first
LMAO
I'd get upset at that too. Complete fucking garbage practise that is a ridiculous waste of money. I'd rather they don't stoop to such shit lows and continue to use their money to actually improve their platform.Genuinely curious: what happens when Valve pays for Steam exclusivity? Do we get upset at that, or not because we like valve?
For the record I've purchased probably around 50+ Steam titles and 0 EGS stuff. I'm not an "Epic shill", but I really don't see the big deal.
Genuinely curious: what happens when Valve pays for Steam exclusivity? Do we get upset at that, or not because we like valve?
For the record I've purchased probably around 50+ Steam titles and 0 EGS stuff. I'm not an "Epic shill", but I really don't see the big deal.
Because MS was somehow involved with this decision? What are you saying here?
Can we move on and talk about the actual game now?
It looks really good, old school first person dungeon crawler filled to the brim with puzzles etc. There's not too much like this out there at the moment and it looks like it's going to fill that gap quite nicely for me.
Yeah it is and it's understandable why people are up in arms about it. It's just people just commenting saying it isn't competing is what bothered me since it is. But I think at this point I'll step away from this since the more important thing is what people think of this practice and I don't want to derail it anymore by trying to get into the definition of competition.It's an anti-consumer form of competition so it's no wonder why consumers don't favor it.
Its funny because there will be no scenario where Steam goes away. Short of someone driving a dump truck fitted with an emp into every server farm its basically eternal. Even if it wasnt just a click of the mouse away and some kind of actual hardware console box would still never go away because people arent going to abandon their hundreds or even thousands of games. And yet despite the platform having no danger to existence people are still losing their shit.People are, by design, so thoroughly ensnared in Steam's ecosystem that they interpret any attack on Valve's monopoly as an attack on themselves.
More puzzling still is people defending garbage anti-competition moves that actively take choice away from consumers.
People are, by design, so thoroughly ensnared in Steam's ecosystem that they interpret any attack on Valve's monopoly as an attack on themselves.
Its funny because there will be no scenario where Steam goes away. Short of someone driving a dump truck fitted with an emp into every server farm its basically eternal. Even if it wasnt just a click of the mouse away and some kind of actual hardware console box would still never go away because people arent going to abandon their hundreds or even thousands of games. And yet despite the platform having no danger to existence people are still losing their shit.
More puzzling still is people defending garbage anti-competition moves that actively take choice away from consumers.
Yes, I agree. It has nothing to do with being forced of using a product with less features at a higher price point. It's all about brand loyalty.
No one has been forced to do anything. Not that your meme-level understanding of the situation contributes anything to the discussion.
Not that your meme-level understanding of the situation contributes anything to the discussion.
No one has been forced to do anything. Not that your meme-level understanding of the situation contributes anything to the discussion.
Whilst I agree games should not only be exclusively on Steam. The game was previously advertised to be released in 2019 on Steam, in addition of having holding it's beta access in the store, before witholding from the said store for a one year exclusivity contract.People are, by design, so thoroughly ensnared in Steam's ecosystem that they interpret any attack on Valve's monopoly as an attack on themselves.