They did. Also a lot of staff move between departments to help out.Didn't Disney suck some of the talent from Pixar for their Disney movies?
Sounds like this is worth skipping at the cinema, thanks.Just saw it. One of Pixar's weakest for me - better than Cars 2 but worse than probably every other film they've made, even The Last Dinosaur. It just felt so pedestrian, like someone trying to imitate the Pixar mould. It was totally fine, but obviously Pixar have spoiled us so much over the years. The ending was pretty good but overall it just felt like a generic animated road movie. 3 stars.
This felt like a bit of "The Good Dinosaur" (great setting, boring story)
Nah. Films like Abominable from Dreamworks also have high RT scores while being very passable kids flicks.Across all/ most of the reviews it seems one thing is clear: if anyone had been putting this out but Pixar, it'd be in Rotten territory.
Quick reminder: The Good Dinosaur stands fresh at 76%, while the immeasurably better Frozen 2 stands at 77% positive reviews.
i was about to say that i didnt really think frozen 2 was a good movie but then i remembered how low of a bar the good dinosaur is.Across all/ most of the reviews it seems one thing is clear: if anyone had been putting this out but Pixar, it'd be in Rotten territory.
Quick reminder: The Good Dinosaur stands fresh at 76%, while the immeasurably better Frozen 2 stands at 77% positive reviews.
I really just don't care for Pixar's output anymore. Aside from Coco and Inside Out, I haven't really dug anything since Toy Story 3 in 2010. The magic is gone.
My specific problem is that, at least from the trailers, the whole vibe of "fantasy tropes but modern" is kinda played out. Pixar's strength is in its unique pitch so it's off brand to have a concept so reheated.
Onward get consistently better and better as it goes on. The trailers really only feature footage and story beats from the first 30-45 minutes of the film. I would say that is a huge mistake, but at the same time I hate to encourage or give approval to trailers that spoil later sections of the movie. It would have been far easier to sell and market Onward if they had put in jokes and action sequences from later in the movie, but it would have made the experience of watching it a lot less fun.Yeah common consensus seems to be "fun and cute but not amazing...until the ending, which is far better than anything that comes before it".
Which is pretty intriguing.
Really good to know, thanksOnward get consistently better and better as it goes on. The trailers really only feature footage and story beats from the first 30-45 minutes of the film. I would say that is a huge mistake, but at the same time I hate to encourage or give approval to trailers that spoil later sections of the movie. It would have been far easier to sell and market Onward if they had put in jokes and action sequences from later in the movie, but it would have made the experience of watching it a lot less fun.
The weird thing is it's the same way I felt about Monsters University. A good film film with an incredible third act that contains a heartfelt and mature message.Yeah common consensus seems to be "fun and cute but not amazing...until the ending, which is far better than anything that comes before it".
Which is pretty intriguing.
The weird thing is it's the same way I felt about Monsters University. A good film film with an incredible third act that contains a heartfelt and mature message.
Probably because Pratt is hot right now and Jack Black isn't. But yeah, the character even kind of seems modeled after the kind of characters Jack Black has played in the past.All I kept thinking when I watched the trailer(s) in the cinema — and on two separate occasions — is why wasn't Jack Black chosen to voice the older brother instead of Chris Pratt?
I have the same thought watching trailers but damn! the movie is great, heartful and beautiful. Pixar still earns my tears after all these years.Yeah, I also thought this was like a B-tier Dreamworks production until I saw it was made by Pixar.
How was The Good Dinosaur a great setting? it was mostly photoreal landscapes with cartoon dinosaurs
I really do not like that movie...
The setting was 'The Wild West but everyone is a dinosaur.' The fact you didn't realise it is part of why it's such a bad film.
Most of the opening 8 or so minutes that you missed were mainly to hammer home how socially awkward Ian is, that it was his birthday and to plant a connecting thread for Barley that comes back at the end of the movie. There was a fun recurring background gag where Ian attempts to and fails to eat breakfast on 3 separate occasions. That said, you really didn't miss much from that opening segment that was covered later.Edit: we might have missed the first bit of the movie, Ian was already being picked up from school by Barley when we got in our seats.
I didn't feel the casting was off in this case. No musical numbers to speak of and Jack Black's a little more larger-than-life than Pratt and might have taken some of the shine off Ian as the central protagonist. I thought Pratt did fine here... even if his character was essentially a modern spin on Gusto Gummi.At least Jack Black has the musical chops ('School of Rock' and 'Tenacious D') and has a wealth of experience in the voiceover department for animated films ('Kung Fu Panda' and 'Goosebumps').
I will FIGHT YOU Coco is amazing
The movie seems to get good reviews. But im more concerned about the actor chris pratt. Chris pratt is heavily rumoured to be homophobic and trump supporter, and im kinda concerned about it. In this kind of showbiz when you are heavily rumoured on something, that is more likely to be true
I dont see the reason to create a new thread for something this trivial. So, the answer is no. I just need a confirmation, not a discussion. If there were an OT for this movie, i would make sure to post it there. But currently it doesnt haveCan you create a new thread instead of taking a crap in this one?
That is refreshing to hear.I'm kinda surprised at how male-focused the film is. I don't think that's a negative, but it very much feels like a film for dads & sons, or brothers. With the way Disney tends to work, I am surprised that they didn't try harder to appeal to the female demographic. That said, there are still some good female characters in the film and probably my favorite character in the whole movie was female (the Manticore!). They just aren't really the stars of the show.
First 30 minutes of Wall-E is god tier. The stuff on the space station though....not so much.man y'all really aren't about WALL-E, huh
I don't blame you I guess, it kinda struggles with pacing
The scene where Carl reaches the place he and his wife always wanted to go is better than the intro.Also Up is like the poster child of a movie being loved and held high only because of a really amazing intro sequence. The rest of the movie was tedious and forgettable af.
Also Up is like the poster child of a movie being loved and held high only because of a really amazing intro sequence. The rest of the movie was tedious and forgettable af.