Is there any indication of what the "lsd" cigarette actually was, considering you can't actually smoke acid? Maybe PCP as he didn't really seem to care that he was stabbed in the leg
Is there any indication of what the "lsd" cigarette actually was, considering you can't actually smoke acid? Maybe PCP as he didn't really seem to care that he was stabbed in the leg
Yeah it's more that I don't think Tarantino would make that "mistake" so I was wondering if I missed anything indicating that it was actually something elseWas it actually acid? Was it laced with something else? Was it actually a different synthetic street drug? Or was it just a storytelling device cooked up in an alternate Tarantino version of our reality?
As omniscient observers we have no idea, no way of really knowing, just that Pitt's character seemed to be tripping and it (loosely) lined up with a standard hallucinogenic experience. Part of the magic is that the scene works the same whatever it was.
saw it Friday in 35mm. Went to Casa Vega (which was also used for the shot set in Spain), on Saturday for lunch, they said they were mobbed on Friday night.
I think it's his most meandering and perhaps loosest film. But it's phenomenally acted and directed. If you know the history of it you're sort of wondering WTF is taking so long, but then those moments are filled with so much tension and dread and then the fairytale ending.
Doesn't top Basterds for me. But it definitely has grown on me as I've thought about it more and I kinda want to see it again.
His outfit reminded me of Austin Powers lolSaw it for the second time Tues.
There's like one or two shots I keep thinking about because it makes me want to laugh. In the first third of the film when they are dancing to Son of a Lovin' Man... and Roman Polanski is getting down in that frilly outfit... I don't know just the thought of that really having happened makes me crack up. I don't know if he was much of a dancer IRL but that actor was selling it for all of his worth.
Its previous owner had turned down Manson for a record contract. Even though Manson knew he no longer lived there, it made the house a target for him nonetheless. Just bad luck for the people who happened to be living there.Why exactly was it that the Polanski house was targeted by the Manson Family?
Why exactly was it that the Polanski house was targeted by the Manson Family?
He was mad at the guy who had lived there, but he also supposedly knew the guy had moved. So maybe he just wanted to kill some rich people and it wa a house he knew?
Has anybody ever asked Manson why he didn't just track down and kill the guy who nixed his record deal?Its previous owner had turned down Manson for a record contract. Even though Manson knew he no longer lived there, it made the house a target for him nonetheless. Just bad luck for the people who happened to be living there.
Dude, Manson was hanging out with the Beach Boys. He was a legit talented musician.
Has anybody ever asked Manson why he didn't just track down and kill the guy who nixed his record deal?
Dude, Manson was hanging out with the Beach Boys. He was a legit talented musician.
I really liked that moment.I remember watching the trailer a few times and never actually hearing what Leo says to that little girl who tells him that was the best acting he had ever seen. I could only make out the "fucking" part and thought maybe he was annoyed at her because she fucked up his headspace for that scene or something. Now that I've seen the film, man, that was such a wholesome moment between them.
That little girl's validation meant SO much for Rick. Made him feel like he could move mountains.
Thinking about this and the Sharon Tate cinema scene gets me a little choked up. Two very touching scenes.
Dude, Manson was hanging out with the Beach Boys. He was a legit talented musician.
Oh yeah, I mean there's a reason the dude nixed his record contract lol. But when you hear "Manson was a singer" the reality is probably somewhat better than what would pop into most people's minds.eh id say he was more an insanely charismatic dude, his music is known now because its by Manson not by its qualities
There's other psychedelics that can be smoked -- peyote, mescaline, DMT, etc.Is there any indication of what the "lsd" cigarette actually was, considering you can't actually smoke acid? Maybe PCP as he didn't really seem to care that he was stabbed in the leg
Its previous owner had turned down Manson for a record contract. Even though Manson knew he no longer lived there, it made the house a target for him nonetheless. Just bad luck for the people who happened to be living there.
Nope, the "Terry" that Manson was asking about in that scene was the legit previous resident of that house and not some Strangers-esque "Is Tamara home?" front.Wait, him asking about the previous owners wasn't a complete front in the movie?
Nope, the "Terry" that Manson was asking about in that scene was the legit previous resident of that house and not some Strangers-esque "Is Tamara home?" front.
Rick floating in his pool, wasted, bulbous headphones on, blasting music, bobbing his head and singing along to some old song about WWII.
Oh shit that's what he was listening to.
That song is one of my favs didn't catch that haha
Side note unrelated the amount of Paul Revere and the Raiders made me happy.
Saw it last night and absolutely loved it, even though the internet and every interview leading up to the release made damn sure you knew what Tate's fate would be going into it.
Thought maybe it needed a little bit less of Leo's acting plot but that ending paid off so well, holy shit. All I could think of was that one Pitt interview where he read the last fight and was like "are you serious?"
Not entirely sure how I felt about Bruce Lee's characterization - it definitely leans into the side of him that most leave unsaid, that he's less of a Jesus-like martial artist like how his movies portray him, and more of a persuasive speaker and typical Hollywood action star.
It started to turn back around to being a positive portrayal when he and Pitt started sparring and were evenly matched, and then showing him repeatedly training with Tate and her ex, which also functioned as a great red herring.
I liked that too. And I saw that they had lived at the house prior IRL.
I think your take on the movie is one based off not understanding some historical context for this movie, which I also didn't understand until I watched Tarantino talking about the film. The ending doesn't say, "what if those days didn't have to end", the beginning of the movie says, "those days ended and you were left behind".It came off to me like the reverse: a three-hour tribute to that old style of masculinity with an ending that asks "What if those days didn't have to end?" DiCaprio may spend most of the movie on the downswing, sure, but the movie doesn't end with him accepting his obsolescence. That's exactly where Tarantino intervenes. Pitt and DiCaprio thwart the plot that ends the sixties, and DiCaprio gets that meeting with "the hottest director in town," implying his star will rise again. I don't necessarily have a problem with all this, but that's the movie I saw.
You're right. I changed my mind the second time I saw it. I actually knew the historical context. I just wasn't thinking straight. By 1969 the '50s are (obviously) long over and what's coming is the New Hollywood of Polanski. The ending doesn't imply that the styles and values of the '50s (already over when the movie begins) will return or revive. It implies that Rick is going to be a part of the new film movement and do some real acting. So yeah, my mistake.I think your take on the movie is one based off not understanding some historical context for this movie, which I also didn't understand until I watched Tarantino talking about the film. The ending doesn't say, "what if those days didn't have to end", the beginning of the movie says, "those days ended and you were left behind".
Has anybody ever asked Manson why he didn't just track down and kill the guy who nixed his record deal?
That was one of my favourite things about it.The Manson family were really just a bunch of bumbling, drug fueled idiots. It's funny that when this movie was announced everyone freaked out thinking QT would glorify Manson and the murders and the gore, and in reality he did nothing of the sort (Manson himself is in the movie for all of like 30 seconds) and really portrayed the rest of the family to something closer to what they really were. Really played with people's expectations.
I think you're rightDid anyone else think the thing with Cliff's wife, and leaving her death a mystery, was a nod to Natalie Wood? The wife mentions a "Natalie" on the phone too. Not that it was supposed to be Natalie Wood, just a nod to an old Hollywood scandal. Or maybe I'm reading too much into it.
Hah, I recognized the theater instantly. I don't often head to Westwood, but I've been there a few times.Gonna repost this from the other thread since people who've already seen the movie might find it cool
Popped by Westwood Village the other day, thought you guys might find this fun
Same here. My wife was howling it was so good.