Ok, forget the "cancel" thing then. What actual damage does internet criticism do, realistically?No where in Obama's remarks does he mention "canceling" anybody.
Ok, forget the "cancel" thing then. What actual damage does internet criticism do, realistically?No where in Obama's remarks does he mention "canceling" anybody.
I think everything that has happened since proves that the dude was and is a massive fucking piece of shit. And I have concerns about boiling sexual assault and being a massive creep with no boundaries as "simple, understandable, and a very human mistake" that just got "overblown".
Whoa whoa whoa. Which of his actions did you think were understandable exactly?
So what did Obama do with the grassroots coalition that got him elected?
Homeboy and Dems had complete control of the government for two years iirc. No excuse. Obama is a half-stepper, he's always had one foot comfortably on the white ruling class's welcome mat and did not want to bother them too much.
I dunno about that, Jesus never mentioned anything about overturning stuffJesus would probably be happier if you agreed with him on trying to overturn the blatantly immoral establishment. Jesus ain't respect the charlatans in power.
What do you mean? Like detracting from someone's initial point because of a small spelling mistake?
The brand prevalent today destroys peaceful discourse and polarizes people to a side. Sometimes for some issues, its justified taking a hard stance. Alot of times its not.Ok, forget the "cancel" thing then. What actual damage does internet criticism do, realistically?
I would consider boldly proclaiming yourself the Son of God to the point of trolling yourself to death as trying to overturn things. Jesus trash talked those in power all the time. You don't get murked if you're harmless to those in power.I dunno about that, Jesus never mentioned anything about overturning stuff
1 year. ted kennedy died in august only 7 months after he took office. scott brown won his seat a few months later. that left them with 59 votes in the senate. by then it was too late to pass obamacare through proper channels and they had to settle for reconciliation.So what did Obama do with the grassroots coalition that got him elected?
Homeboy and Dems had complete control of the government for two years iirc. No excuse. Obama is a half-stepper, he's always had one foot comfortably on the white ruling class's welcome mat and did not want to bother them too much.
That's fair. But I'd argue those people wouldn't really be engaging in meaningful discourse anyways.Yeah people no longer engage with the idea because everyone's fighting over usage rules, or just doing "lol pronounciation"
i guess so, but I'd say the benefits of calling people out faaaar outway the negatives still.The brand prevalent today destroys peaceful discourse and polarizes people to a side. Sometimes for some issues, its justified taking a hard stance. Alot of times its not.
So what did Obama do with the grassroots coalition that got him elected?
Homeboy and Dems had complete control of the government for two years iirc. No excuse. Obama is a half-stepper, he's always had one foot comfortably on the white ruling class's welcome mat and did not want to bother them too much.
I don't. Internet toxicity has degraded society tremendously. And the only thing gained is that the really shitty people have gone underground to where we can't easily find them.That's fair. But I'd argue those people wouldn't really be engaging in meaningful discourse anyways.
i guess so, but I'd say the benefits of calling people out faaaar outway the negatives still.
1 year. ted kennedy died in august only 7 months after he took office. scott brown won his seat a few months later. that left them with 59 votes in the senate. by then it was too late to pass obamacare through proper channels and they had to settle for reconciliation.
the first year was essentially wasted trying to pass the Obamacare and the $800 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment act. you could argue he couldve done more in the first year, but those were insane times. we were still losing 600k jobs a month and he had to step in to save the auto industry which couldve plunged us into depression if he hadnt bailed them out and saved tens of millions of jobs.
besides, no one couldve forseen ted kennedy dying 8 months in and then MA electing a republican senator. he basically had 1 year to do stuff and he was too busy fighting fires to do anything of lasting value. the fact that he got obamacare through somehow is an achievement of its own.
Sure, I'll admit I'm guilty of that. I will also say that I disagree somewhat fundamentally with the rest his statement, not just when he said "nobodys perfect". I think he's being a bit too forgiving to people in positions of power or wealth that end up abusing those privileges. Why should we forgive people who do awful things? Why should people not publicly respond negatively to actions they find harmful or abusive?
Man, Biden must have some serious skeletons we don't know about.
Also, this is exactly the sort of spineless shit that I expect from Obama.
It's actually 3.3x the median income.
The numbers that you're going to see with a quick search are always household numbers which are meaningless because of how much the number of earners in a household can vary.
And the only thing gained is that the really shitty people have gone underground to where we can't easily find them.
I agree with everything you're saying here and admit that I'm sort of taking what Obama's saying here to talk about more than just "call out culture". I'm definitely guilty of using this as a means to talk about a bigger issue (people abusing their power, privileges).I agree about not letting people off the hook who abuse privleges. I did not see Obama saying to do that, at least not in the 2 minute clip linked in the OP. Nor did he say not to call people out, he says that calls out are "not enough."
Not directed at you personally/only, but so many of the defensive reactions in the thread seem to not have even read or listened to what he said. They read the headline about "woke callouts" and immediately started shit-talking and trying to get clap-backs and only furthered his point.
Ah ha! I knew I got the wrong number. Thanks!
Fucking good. We already know deplatforming works. If it's harder for us to find them, it's also harder for the general public to find them as well forcing their shitty views to stay with them.
I
I agree with everything you're saying here and admit that I'm sort of taking what Obama's saying here to talk about more than just "call out culture". I'm definitely guilty of using this as a means to talk about a bigger issue (people abusing their power, privileges).
I don't really like what he says about call outs being "not enough". I think it's kind of uncool to say that an individual isn't doing enough when they often don't have the power to do much in the first place.
Not everything can be forgiven even if the person changes their ways.Should be based on progress of the person and severity of the action. One thing I do agree with Jesus everything can be forgiven. Doesnt mean is has to be forgotten
Yeah, I guess I just don't really care about those people personally. Let them think they're doing something good, it doesn't really matter.There's people who don't have the means to do more and people who do but are satisfied with doing the bare minimum and feeling good about themselves.
Good for you maybe. Deplatforming only works for people who had a platform to begin with. The average POS doesn't and them outing themselves on social media is among the few tools people have to identify them.
And unless they're out there spouting off their shit, it's not an issue is it?
Once a POS outs themself, then what do you think happens? They're magically locked up in some jail?
The often go viral and lose their jobs for one.
I don't buy the "they can't reach other people" angle. No decent person can be turned into say a racist from online discussions.
If I thought that would be enough for those people, I'd be elated.He's right. I just wish people didn't have to hear it from him to believe it.
The brand prevalent today destroys peaceful discourse and polarizes people to a side. Sometimes for some issues, its justified taking a hard stance. Alot of times its not.
This post is vague nonsensical centrism that extols civility as the most important part of discourse.