• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Mar Tuuk

Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,566
"But the work was necessary, and it was my responsibility to make sure our operations were as effective as possible." - Barack Obama

Wow he doubled down on the deaths of children. As a Pakistani-American, I can't forgive you Obama.
Vc0QKxl.jpg
 

dabig2

Member
Oct 29, 2017
5,116
Remotely piloted warfare is evil. But as much as I despise Obama's use of drone strikes, it was pentagon doctrine before his presidency and will continue to be unless someone stands up to it. And since that would mean sending American troops into harm's way (because, after all, reaching out to hearts and minds couldn't POSSIBLY work /s), good luck finding politicians who'd want to risk another Jimmy Carter hostage rescue disaster?
At least Obama used boots of the ground for Bin Laden.

A lot of people stood it up to it as it was happening.

This was 1 month into the administration:

Call Off Drone War, Influential U.S. Adviser Says

For months, Pakistani leaders have complained, loudly, about American drone strikes on their territory. Now, an influential adviser to American policymakers is raising his voice against the unmanned attacks, too. "If we want to strengthen our friends and weaken our enemies in Pakistan, bombing...
"If we want to strengthen our friends and weaken our enemies in Pakistan, bombing Pakistani villages with unmanned drones is totally counterproductive," Dr. David Kilcullen tells Danger Room. Kilcullen, a former Australian colonel, is considered one of the leading thinkers on counterinsurgency, providing advice to both U.S. Central Command chief Gen. David Petraeus and former Secretary of State Condolleeza Rice.

Unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, have struck targets in Pakistan at least 40 times in the last year. The most recent attack came just days after President Obama was sworn in. Twenty-two people were reportedly killed in the strike.
U.S. officials say the drones have taken out dozens of militants who were undermining American efforts in the region. Perhaps so, Kilcullen acknowledges. But using drones to attack those militants "increase the number and radicalism of Pakistanis who support extremism, and thus undermine the key strategic program of building a willing and capable partner in Pakistan," he writes in Monday's Small Wars Journal blog. Kilcullen gave much the same message, in testimony last week before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Kilcullen doesn't think all UAV attacks are bad. "While ever al Qa'ida remains active and can threaten the international community from bases within Pakistan, the need to strike terrorist targets on Pakistani territory will remain. But our policy should be to treat this as an absolute, and rarely invoked, last resort," he notes.

It was all ignored, and Obama had a great opportunity to buck the trend of using drones to further American hegemony.

But just like with Bush before him, he ignored solid advice and powered through a lot of horrific stuff, and then lied to cover it all up so that he could keep doing it while messing up the heads of those asked to do all of this murder.

www.nbcnews.com

Former Drone Pilots Denounce 'Morally Outrageous' Program

Former Air Force airmen are speaking out against America’s drone war, calling the military drone program “morally outrageous” and “one of the most devastating driving forces for terrorism and destabilization around the world.”
In interviews with NBC News, three former servicemen — who together have 15 years of military drone experience — decried the civilian cost of drone strikes and called on President Obama to "turn this around" before he leaves office.

"We were very callous about any real collateral damage," said Michael Haas, 29, who worked as both a drone operator and instructor. "Whenever that possibility came up, most of the time it was a 'guilt by association' or sometimes we didn't even consider other people that were on screen."
"We witnessed gross waste, mismanagement, abuses of power, and our country's leaders lying publicly about the effectiveness of the drone program," the four men wrote in their letter.

Their lawyer, Kathleen McClellan, called their open opposition a "historic moment."

"This is the first time this many people who served in the drone program are speaking out," she said in an interview with NBC News.

Stephen Lewis, 29, who controlled the cameras on the drones that helped guide Hellfire missiles into their targets, said he "drank [himself] to sleep" every night after getting home from work. "It was the culture there," he said. "Everybody did something to take the edge off — to reform reality so you didn't have to think about what you did."

Obama and his admin were not helpless things just following the inertia of American bloodlust. They dove right in and spearheaded it, covered up as much as they could, obfuscated as much as they could, and justified it as much as they could. At a certain point there needs to be a reckoning for all of this lying and murder that isn't abstracted away as just something America does and that's that, no further reflection.
 

krazen

Member
Oct 27, 2017
13,157
Gentrified Brooklyn
Yah, Obama like all the presidents is a war criminal and a murderer. And America will never admit the truth of its crimes before it collapses.

Yeah.

I mean, here's the thing. He's selling it as if he wasn't culpable.
But to a certain extent hurting black and brown people internationally (and locally...that was important to our forefathers) is part of what we do.


If we didn't have dead white soldier fatigue after the Iraq war Trump/Barton could have sold a Desert Storm type operation where it's just unrelenting missile and drone strikes.

He's not wrong that stopping our murder machine would have been the end of his presidency. I mean, it would have been nice of him to like, lol, try and maybe not ramp it up to the tenth degree. But there's a dark truth there
 
Last edited:

SteveMeister

Member
Oct 31, 2017
1,821
A lot of people stood it up to it as it was happening.

This was 1 month into the administration:

Call Off Drone War, Influential U.S. Adviser Says

For months, Pakistani leaders have complained, loudly, about American drone strikes on their territory. Now, an influential adviser to American policymakers is raising his voice against the unmanned attacks, too. "If we want to strengthen our friends and weaken our enemies in Pakistan, bombing...



It was all ignored, and Obama had a great opportunity to buck the trend of using drones to further American hegemony.

But just like with Bush before him, he ignored solid advice and powered through a lot of horrific stuff, and then lied to cover it all up so that he could keep doing it while messing up the heads of those asked to do all of this murder.

www.nbcnews.com

Former Drone Pilots Denounce 'Morally Outrageous' Program

Former Air Force airmen are speaking out against America’s drone war, calling the military drone program “morally outrageous” and “one of the most devastating driving forces for terrorism and destabilization around the world.”



Obama and his admin were not helpless things just following the inertia of American bloodlust. They dove right in and spearheaded it, covered up as much as they could, obfuscated as much as they could, and justified it as much as they could. At a certain point there needs to be a reckoning for all of this lying and murder that isn't abstracted away as just something America does and that's that, no further reflection.

If I wasn't clear enough, I meant that a president would have to be the one to stand up to it.
 

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,142
I don't know if the US will ever solve the Imperial Presidency.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
His whole "they were dangerous young men, wish I could've given them education and opportunity but instead I had to kill them" line is exactly what cops say to justify their killing of black men in cities all over this country.
 

Pekola

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,507
This man is such a deplorable, cynical creature.

Those lives are not meant to be an afterthought in his third vapid book venture, so he can line his pockets. They were children with a whole future ahead of them.

Not only did he do this. He's also ushered in austerity for millions, by letting vultures bleed the people of Puerto Rico dry.

If hell exists, he's gonna be extra crispy.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
Why was Rahm so obsessed with killing people in the middle east?
Why was Obama?

Him trying to punt the ball to Rahm Emanuel in this book, because he KNOWS Rahm is persona-non-grata in progressive and even some liberal circles now, is the most cynical and cowardly shit. Don't fall for it.

Like I'm sure Rahm was drooling at the idea of killing brown children with drones but he wasn't the one ordering the strikes or crafting the policy. That's on Obama.
 

Typhoon20

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,568
It always boggles my mind when they pretend Obama as different. I guess people were enchanted by his charisma.

The way he talks about this is...chilling. It's scary honestly.
 

moustascheman

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,662
Canada
"In places like Yemen and Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq, the lives of millions of young men...had been warped and stunted by desperation, ignorance, dreams of religious glory, the violence of their surroundings, or the schemes of older men. They were dangerous, these young men, often deliberately and casually cruel. Still, in the aggregate, at least, I wanted somehow to save them — send them to school, give them a trade, drain them of the hate that had been filling their heads," Obama wrote.

This is pretty fucking disgusting victim blaming. Obama is a monster.
 

BabyMurloc

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,890
Charisma and American presidents in combination always seems to result in widespread death and suffering.

edit: then again when was the last time America didn't regularly bomb another nation?
 

Jombie

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,392
In the end, Obama is another tone deaf elitist who can't read a room to save his life. The semantics at play over "combatants" is terrifying and depressing. If you were in the path of view of any of these drones, you were a fucking enemy combatant and something to be destroyed. It just reinforces how little we see people from the middle east as people - good people, sick people, elderly, children - all killed in an effort to pander to the right.
 
Oct 28, 2017
2,965
Yeah this was a bad take from Obama. Just a throwaway line or two on hundreds if not thousands of civilians dead.. Also, fucking Rahm Emmanuel :

Then maybe Obama should have fired the guy who's obsessed with a kill list and acted like the liberal president people voted for, instead of trying to appease Republicans.

Preemptively compromising every stance so conservatives won't call you weak/wasteful/an swj snowflake is probably one of the biggest problems of the leftwing establishment everywhere
 
Oct 27, 2017
39,148
Obama might have been one of the better presidents for the US civilians but that doesn't mean everyone else had the same feeling.

He is a war criminal pure and simple. No amount of defense can change that.
 

Soda

Member
Oct 26, 2017
8,873
Dunedin, New Zealand
All things considered, I'd argue Obama's only above average actions as a President were actions taken to get the Affordable Care Act enacted. Beyond that, he was fairly average or downright bad (e.g., drone strikes).
 

Soda

Member
Oct 26, 2017
8,873
Dunedin, New Zealand
Why was Obama?

Him trying to punt the ball to Rahm Emanuel in this book, because he KNOWS Rahm is persona-non-grata in progressive and even some liberal circles now, is the most cynical and cowardly shit. Don't fall for it.

Like I'm sure Rahm was drooling at the idea of killing brown children with drones but he wasn't the one ordering the strikes or crafting the policy. That's on Obama.

Yep. "The buck stops here" would have applied to Obama if he had called to stop this. He let it slide at the very least if not encouraged it at the worst. Either way, the outcome is the same.
 

entremet

You wouldn't toast a NES cartridge
Member
Oct 26, 2017
60,142
Chomsky has a famous saying about US Presidents and war criminals. I think almost every President has been one, including the vaunted Lincoln.

The Constitution grants the Presidency Commander and Chief and Foreign Policy powers which always seem to be exercised in violent ways.
 

Annubis

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,660
Inherently evil country and the office of President is also inherently evil.
When you're at the head of a blood thirsty country fueled by hate, violence, and fear, even a saint will have to kill due to the will of the mass.

As long as the US has a culture of violence, every president will be a murderer.
 

gozu

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,341
America
He's not telling the whole truth about this. The kind of disgusting moral calls most have to make to become president, and the political calculations you have to make to remain one , effectively trading lives for re-election votes, are not something most of the public would publicly admit they approve of. I have no doubt he did this. Based on the comments on Rahm's "obsession".

ways lives get traded for votes include things like drone strikes and war but also ignoring COVID or ignoring lung or brain poisoning pollution, etc. There are tons of ways to indirectly murder people.

We can all agree that Obama was no saint but how does he compare to the average US president in your opinion? Someone like Clinton, Carter or Bush the first.
 

Pekola

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,507
Obama might have been one of the better presidents for the US civilians but that doesn't mean everyone else had the same feeling.

He is a war criminal pure and simple. No amount of defense can change that.

Even that is debatable due his actions towards the citizens of Puerto Rico, the beginning of Black Lives Matter, and his actions in Flint.

It's one thing to argue that being president means you inherit the imperialism, and that's unavoidable.

But how do you justify the mockery of drinking a sip of Flint water to discount the lived experience of thousands of kids drinking contaminated water?
 

XaviConcept

Art Director for Videogames
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
4,909
Pick your dream choice tor President and they will all have to face similar situations and choices, with zero chance they step away from the job with their hands clean.

I hate that he did what he did and I hate that it happened, I cant excuse the behavior but I dont think much can be done about it regarding the most powerful army in the world.
 

Scuffed

Member
Oct 28, 2017
10,896
"The former president said Emanuel had "spent enough time in Washington to know that his new, liberal president couldn't afford to look soft on terrorism"

This is the mindset that keeps the status quo, it also fed his aggressive deportations. It's cowardly bullshit because just like any name the GoP wants to call you, trying to counter it is a complete waste of time and so much worse if to counter the label you are killing innocents. If they were calling Biden a socialist when he is practically a Conservative, then you pretty much have to expect a label regardless of your actions so it's best to just do the right fucking thing.
 

Jombie

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,392
I don't believe for a second these drone strikes were split second decisions that he had a hard time making. It was a vain effort to make him look tough to the other kids on the playground.
 

dabig2

Member
Oct 29, 2017
5,116
It's the same type of bigoted shit white people say about black men. It's gross.

It's also some "White Man Burden" American imperialism bullshit of a framing
800px-%22The_White_Man%27s_Burden%22_Judge_1899.png


Obama parallel in these days would be dumping the kids on the rocks painting a giant target sign on their heads for the drones to bomb later.


In the end, Obama is another tone deaf elitist who can't read a room to save his life. The semantics at play over "combatants" is terrifying and depressing. If you were in the path of view of any of these drones, you were a fucking enemy combatant and something to be destroyed. It just reinforces how little we see people from the middle east as people - good people, sick people, elderly, children - all killed in an effort to pander to the right.

It's such a feeble excuse too, cause it doesn't explain their actions taken after being confronted with gross human rights violations and the coverups involved.

There's so many stories, but 1 in particular that is horrible is this account:
nabila-rehamn-holds-picture-she-drew-of-drone-attack1-3.jpeg

atiq8a.wordpress.com

Being Not So Malala

“I was in the field with my grandmother, sister and brother, passionately gathering okra. It was a nice sunny day with little breeze. There was some air of joy with Eid just a day away. It was all …
(note that Malala referenced in the journal is Malala Yousafzai, the young Pakistani activist who rose to international fame following the Taliban's attempts on her life).
It was a long and hard-trodden journey to Washington DC where US Congress was to hear a testimony from civilian casualties of their drone policies for the first time. Despite hard toil and obstacles, they were finally there to present their case. Unlike Malala, Nabeela along her father,
Rafiq ur Rehman and brother Zubair were given a cold reception with extinguished furore.
But that was irrelevant, she wasn't a celebratory to be idolized, she was there to ask questions, some real unpleasant, hard to bite, chew and digest.
The indifference of attitudes was clearly visible when only five out of four hundred & thirty congressmen turned up to listen to her plight. Unsurprisingly, Barack Obama preferred meeting CEO of weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin than a girl presenting a humanitarian crisis
. No warm welcomes!
Nabeela instead of spending time in trivialities, came to her point straight on. "
I had heard they were coming after people who had done wrong to America. We haven't done anything wrong. Why did they kill my grandmother? Do they have any answer? Nobody has told us why did they kill her", narrated the translator with eyes full of tears.

Media had reported that US drone hit a car but there did not exist a road in reality. They came up with the story that a house was hit but it was an open field. According to them, militants were killed but in fact, the one bearing the brunt was Momina Bibi.
But it was not just the case of Momina Bibi or her family, it was the case of hundreds of innocent civilians including children being murdered and accounting the perpetrators for the war crimes. It was the case of US admitting to failed endeavours in pursuit of her robust war industry and the blunders being committed all over the world throughout the history.

Like if Obama wants to make excuses and sidestep responsibilities in a mass murder campaign, then ok. But the coverup and treatment of the victims after the fact, and complete disregard for their lives and well-being after ruining them, is what really puts this all over the top.
 

Karateka

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,940
Good companion piece:

www.vice.com

Obama's Memoir Glosses Over His Horrific Drone War

The former president's 768-page memoir hardly mentions the drone program, which killed hundreds of civilians, and when it does it's pretty gross.


Psychopath shit.



3 days after his inauguration, and he was already vaporizing innocents and covering it up/denying it happened. So the whole "woe is them and me, nevertheless" routine is bordering nonsense talk.








We all need to push back more against this killing and lying being done in our name. None of this bullshit is fixing the material conditions of the people here and definitely not out there, and it's long past time Americans recognized that.

Trying to walk around proving you have a big dick and a big gun to fascist Repubs who are going to spurn you anyways is NOT what should drive foreign policy. But Obama is just literally admitting it here, and it's the most pathetic and feeble sidestepping I've heard from a killer in awhile.

This is pointless grammar discussion but isn't it "strong suit" and not "strong suite"
That's a pretty common error in the book then?
 

DeltaRed

Member
Apr 27, 2018
5,746
The President is also the Commander in Chief, and the US is the biggest War Machine of the past 70-80 years and is a nation obsessed with it's military so I'm not sure there will ever be a "good" President.
 

Uhtred

Alt Account
Banned
May 4, 2020
1,340
Despicable.

You would think a black man, an educated black man, aware of the injustice people of color have faced, continue to face at the hands of white imperialists would realize the horrible injustice of this program.

But I guess being wealthy overrides all that. I bet we all look like ants to the wealthy from up there.

I mean what's a few hundred brown children when I have to think about my image!
 
It is the usual immoral and monstrous business of American empire. But with Obama, it stands out particularly because of his image representing the hope of a fundamental change in the American character and trajectory.

And in hindsight, his attempt to look "tough" and his insecurity over image as a liberal president (which itself says a lot about what he really thinks of the American character) seems so pointless. The dark side of America was already bubbling up to shove fascism into power in response to white rage at a black man being president. Republicans had already committed to burning the country down to stop liberals from accomplishing anything.
 

Semfry

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,956
"In places like the USA, the lives of millions of young men...had been warped and stunted by desperation, ignorance, dreams of religious glory, the violence of their surroundings, or the schemes of older men. They were dangerous, these young men, often deliberately and casually cruel. Still, in the aggregate, at least, I wanted somehow to save them — send them to school, give them a trade, drain them of the hate that had been filling their heads"

Hmm...
 

Deleted member 2145

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
29,223
this memoir has just been elaborating on what we all already knew

despicable doesn't even begin to cover it
 

Keasar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,724
Umeå, Sweden
It's almost like the office of the US. Presidency is fucking corrupt at it's very core no matter who sits in there and serve only as another arm of the beast that is capitalism to ravage the world for self interests...
 

Trup1aya

Literally a train safety expert
Member
Oct 25, 2017
21,363
You cant be a US president and also be a good person. Its a political impossibility. Emmanuel is a giant sack of shit, but in this case he's horrifically right- you dont get to plug away at your liberal agenda for 8 years if you arent dropping bombs on brown people. That's the reality of the world be live in. How the fuck do we change it?