Remotely piloted warfare is evil. But as much as I despise Obama's use of drone strikes, it was pentagon doctrine before his presidency and will continue to be unless someone stands up to it. And since that would mean sending American troops into harm's way (because, after all, reaching out to hearts and minds couldn't POSSIBLY work /s), good luck finding politicians who'd want to risk another Jimmy Carter hostage rescue disaster?
At least Obama used boots of the ground for Bin Laden.
"If we want to strengthen our friends and weaken our enemies in Pakistan, bombing Pakistani villages with unmanned drones is totally counterproductive," Dr. David Kilcullen tells Danger Room. Kilcullen, a former Australian colonel, is considered one of the leading thinkers on counterinsurgency, providing advice to both U.S. Central Command chief Gen. David Petraeus and former Secretary of State Condolleeza Rice.
Unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, have struck targets in Pakistan at least 40 times in the last year. The most recent attack came just days after President Obama was sworn in. Twenty-two people were reportedly killed in the strike.
U.S. officials say the drones have taken out dozens of militants who were undermining American efforts in the region. Perhaps so, Kilcullen acknowledges. But using drones to attack those militants "increase the number and radicalism of Pakistanis who support extremism, and thus undermine the key strategic program of building a willing and capable partner in Pakistan," he writes in Monday's Small Wars Journal blog. Kilcullen gave much the same message, in testimony last week before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Kilcullen doesn't think all UAV attacks are bad. "While ever al Qa'ida remains active and can threaten the international community from bases within Pakistan, the need to strike terrorist targets on Pakistani territory will remain. But our policy should be to treat this as an absolute, and rarely invoked, last resort," he notes.
In interviews with NBC News, three former servicemen — who together have 15 years of military drone experience — decried the civilian cost of drone strikes and called on President Obama to "turn this around" before he leaves office.
"We were very callous about any real collateral damage," said Michael Haas, 29, who worked as both a drone operator and instructor. "Whenever that possibility came up, most of the time it was a 'guilt by association' or sometimes we didn't even consider other people that were on screen."
"We witnessed gross waste, mismanagement, abuses of power, and our country's leaders lying publicly about the effectiveness of the drone program," the four men wrote in their letter.
Their lawyer, Kathleen McClellan, called their open opposition a "historic moment."
"This is the first time this many people who served in the drone program are speaking out," she said in an interview with NBC News.
Stephen Lewis, 29, who controlled the cameras on the drones that helped guide Hellfire missiles into their targets, said he "drank [himself] to sleep" every night after getting home from work. "It was the culture there," he said. "Everybody did something to take the edge off — to reform reality so you didn't have to think about what you did."
To murder innocent people or to not murder innocent people.Me neither. Could never make the kinds of life and death decisions they do.
I'd preffer the "burden" of being the most powerful human being on Earth over being the target of one his drones, personally.
Yah, Obama like all the presidents is a war criminal and a murderer. And America will never admit the truth of its crimes before it collapses.
A lot of people stood it up to it as it was happening.
This was 1 month into the administration:
Call Off Drone War, Influential U.S. Adviser Says
For months, Pakistani leaders have complained, loudly, about American drone strikes on their territory. Now, an influential adviser to American policymakers is raising his voice against the unmanned attacks, too. "If we want to strengthen our friends and weaken our enemies in Pakistan, bombing...www.wired.com
It was all ignored, and Obama had a great opportunity to buck the trend of using drones to further American hegemony.
But just like with Bush before him, he ignored solid advice and powered through a lot of horrific stuff, and then lied to cover it all up so that he could keep doing it while messing up the heads of those asked to do all of this murder.
Former Drone Pilots Denounce 'Morally Outrageous' Program
Former Air Force airmen are speaking out against America’s drone war, calling the military drone program “morally outrageous” and “one of the most devastating driving forces for terrorism and destabilization around the world.”www.nbcnews.com
Obama and his admin were not helpless things just following the inertia of American bloodlust. They dove right in and spearheaded it, covered up as much as they could, obfuscated as much as they could, and justified it as much as they could. At a certain point there needs to be a reckoning for all of this lying and murder that isn't abstracted away as just something America does and that's that, no further reflection.
Why was Obama?Why was Rahm so obsessed with killing people in the middle east?
there's a reason why black lives matter started under his tenure as presidentHis whole "they were dangerous young men, wish I could've given them education and opportunity but instead I had to kill them" line is exactly what cops say to justify their killing of black men in cities all over this country.
"In places like Yemen and Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq, the lives of millions of young men...had been warped and stunted by desperation, ignorance, dreams of religious glory, the violence of their surroundings, or the schemes of older men. They were dangerous, these young men, often deliberately and casually cruel. Still, in the aggregate, at least, I wanted somehow to save them — send them to school, give them a trade, drain them of the hate that had been filling their heads," Obama wrote.
Yah, Obama like all the presidents is a war criminal and a murderer. And America will never admit the truth of its crimes before it collapses.
I don't know if the US will ever solve the Imperial Presidency.
It's the same type of bigoted shit white people say about black men. It's gross.This is pretty fucking disgusting victim blaming. Obama is a monster.
This is pretty fucking disgusting victim blaming. Obama is a monster.
Yeah this was a bad take from Obama. Just a throwaway line or two on hundreds if not thousands of civilians dead.. Also, fucking Rahm Emmanuel :
War of Terror for millions of people.
Why was Obama?
Him trying to punt the ball to Rahm Emanuel in this book, because he KNOWS Rahm is persona-non-grata in progressive and even some liberal circles now, is the most cynical and cowardly shit. Don't fall for it.
Like I'm sure Rahm was drooling at the idea of killing brown children with drones but he wasn't the one ordering the strikes or crafting the policy. That's on Obama.
These strikes were primarily civilian casualties, with the occasional "combatant" thrown in.
the US doesn't even recognize The Hague I think.This is probably it, other countries' leaders would have been called war criminals and be on trial as such. But the US is too mighty and too influential that any American would go to The Hague.
No one should have so much power to make such a decision in the first place.Me neither. Could never make the kinds of life and death decisions they do.
When you're at the head of a blood thirsty country fueled by hate, violence, and fear, even a saint will have to kill due to the will of the mass.Inherently evil country and the office of President is also inherently evil.
Obama might have been one of the better presidents for the US civilians but that doesn't mean everyone else had the same feeling.
He is a war criminal pure and simple. No amount of defense can change that.
Him blaming it on Rahm is nonsense. He's the president. He can just say no we aren't drone striking people and its done. This is nothing more than a deflection from Obama.Why was Rahm so obsessed with killing people in the middle east?
"The former president said Emanuel had "spent enough time in Washington to know that his new, liberal president couldn't afford to look soft on terrorism"
It's the same type of bigoted shit white people say about black men. It's gross.
In the end, Obama is another tone deaf elitist who can't read a room to save his life. The semantics at play over "combatants" is terrifying and depressing. If you were in the path of view of any of these drones, you were a fucking enemy combatant and something to be destroyed. It just reinforces how little we see people from the middle east as people - good people, sick people, elderly, children - all killed in an effort to pander to the right.
It was a long and hard-trodden journey to Washington DC where US Congress was to hear a testimony from civilian casualties of their drone policies for the first time. Despite hard toil and obstacles, they were finally there to present their case. Unlike Malala, Nabeela along her father,
Rafiq ur Rehman and brother Zubair were given a cold reception with extinguished furore.
But that was irrelevant, she wasn't a celebratory to be idolized, she was there to ask questions, some real unpleasant, hard to bite, chew and digest.
The indifference of attitudes was clearly visible when only five out of four hundred & thirty congressmen turned up to listen to her plight. Unsurprisingly, Barack Obama preferred meeting CEO of weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin than a girl presenting a humanitarian crisis. No warm welcomes!
Nabeela instead of spending time in trivialities, came to her point straight on. "
I had heard they were coming after people who had done wrong to America. We haven't done anything wrong. Why did they kill my grandmother? Do they have any answer? Nobody has told us why did they kill her", narrated the translator with eyes full of tears.
Media had reported that US drone hit a car but there did not exist a road in reality. They came up with the story that a house was hit but it was an open field. According to them, militants were killed but in fact, the one bearing the brunt was Momina Bibi.
But it was not just the case of Momina Bibi or her family, it was the case of hundreds of innocent civilians including children being murdered and accounting the perpetrators for the war crimes. It was the case of US admitting to failed endeavours in pursuit of her robust war industry and the blunders being committed all over the world throughout the history.
Good companion piece:
Obama's Memoir Glosses Over His Horrific Drone War
The former president's 768-page memoir hardly mentions the drone program, which killed hundreds of civilians, and when it does it's pretty gross.www.vice.com
Psychopath shit.
3 days after his inauguration, and he was already vaporizing innocents and covering it up/denying it happened. So the whole "woe is them and me, nevertheless" routine is bordering nonsense talk.
We all need to push back more against this killing and lying being done in our name. None of this bullshit is fixing the material conditions of the people here and definitely not out there, and it's long past time Americans recognized that.
Trying to walk around proving you have a big dick and a big gun to fascist Repubs who are going to spurn you anyways is NOT what should drive foreign policy. But Obama is just literally admitting it here, and it's the most pathetic and feeble sidestepping I've heard from a killer in awhile.
"In places like the USA, the lives of millions of young men...had been warped and stunted by desperation, ignorance, dreams of religious glory, the violence of their surroundings, or the schemes of older men. They were dangerous, these young men, often deliberately and casually cruel. Still, in the aggregate, at least, I wanted somehow to save them — send them to school, give them a trade, drain them of the hate that had been filling their heads"