That is what happened in the old type. The new type does not look oil painty. 2.0 works very differently
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Nvidia's DLSS 2.0 Coming to Control and Mechwarrior 5
- Thread starter ILikeFeet
- Start date
dont you think the 2.0 quality mode uses some type of sharpening ? Sometimes it looks a bit off
That's good to hear. I was mostly talking in the broad sense, especially w/ regards to neural network texture mods, but those are working with really low-res images to begin with so they'll naturally look more artificial.
When is this happening? Control is getting dlc on thursday.
Edit: Happening with the patch update on the 26th :)
Edit: Happening with the patch update on the 26th :)
Realistically, can a improved version of this tech be in the Switch 2? It seems to me it could be a great tool for developers downporting from PS5/XSX
OP
OP
I still remember people on this forum shitting on ray tracing and saying its just better reflections , before new consoles got announced . Good times
It's always like that.
- Feature gets announced. Only cutting-edge PC hardware that supports it gets released.
- Gets shit on by everyone that cannot get said feature (customers from the oppossing "team" and console fanbase)
- Opposing team announces hardware for feature, their customers praise it.
- Console makers announce hardware for feature, their customers praise it.
- Users that defended said feature back when it was first revealed sigh simultanously because now people realize "feature is good and is the future".
How costly are those things? I really wouldn't mind paying more for a Switch 2 that can use this.
It is funny seeing the same posters who shat on ray tracing suddenly champion it as Microsoft's trump card over Sony.
clearly those people dont understand anything , since ps5 ssd gonna make up the difference in cpu, memory and gpu and gonna revolutionize gaming as we know it, guys
OP
OP
the costs would come from the die size and at 7nm (or 5nm), I doubt it would be costly. doesn't seem like it's a case of "tensor cores or more SM"
It goes both ways. I remember lots of people shitting on image reconstruction because they want "ma real 4k yo".
OP
OP
after the announcement of DX12U and that microsoft was working on it for the past couple years, Nvidia was just ahead of the curve, implementing these things early
We told em it'd get better. At least we survived long enough to see the technique prove its worth.
Looking at the demo for Cyberpunk with neon lights and computer screens everywhere. Definitely gonna need this to play that game with raytraced lighting. I really hope they have RTX and DLSS ready by launch like Control did.
1800p was the old arbitrary resolution detractors stated to use to match DLSS 1.0, I wonder what the new suggested resolution will be now.
It wasn't arbitrary. On early versions of DLSS that resolution was a close match for DLSS performance at 4K, and in many cases *did* offer better IQ. Not since Control though.
Lets not pretend DLSS wasn't crap at first. It was. Same with v1.0 RT implementations. But that's kind of to be expected with any new technology. Initial implementations aren't going to tell you exactly how good it can get, and its always worth waiting a while to see where the ceiling might be.
Anyone who really believed reflections at 1080p in Battlefield 5 represented the high end for this, was clearly ignoring how these changes have gone in the past.
Edit: and lets also forget it's not 'free' in the sense that if you have an RTX card, you paid for the silicon that's handling DLSS and in games that don't use DLSS, those tensor cores aren't doing anything.
Tim must feel pretty good knowing he has that sort of influence. Lmao
I wish 4A would update Metro Exodus' DLSS!
Battlefield and FFXV were crap. Metro Exodus got its DLSS updated in less than two weeks after release which made the videos comparing its pre patched version to 1800p outdated. Its markedly improved and few bothered to cover it.
Last edited:
Didn't you have a 5700XT? I seem to remember an argument where you mentioned that.
the update just made it as good as bog standard resolution upscaling. better in some ways and worse in others. it still had that very undesirable water color paint look. wolfenstein is the first use case of value.
OP
OP
They got all that info from Nvidia. Even the 1.9 and 2.0 moniker.
DLSS was supported for ultrawides, as long as your ultrawide was a standard 21:9 model.
I hope that the new patch will a) support super ultrawide resolutions and b) support DLSS for those.
That performance upgrade is no joke. I had to play Control with raytracing in 3840x1080 with image sharpening because DLSS was not supported at patched 5120x1440 and that resolution ran at about 20 fps on a 2080 Ti. With DLSS enabled I expect to enjoy full super ultrawide without problems. For the record 5120x1440 is 1M pixels less than 4K 16:9.
I had a 2070 previously. I'm not the only one saying it doesn't look too hot.
I hope the updates/coming update improved it.
You went from a 2070 to a 5700xt? Ouch. Your previous GPU was much more future proof with DX12 Ultimate support. Can't you get it back?
Btw, control used DLSS 1.9 which looks okay but not very good either. DLSS 2.0 comes this week for control and Dlss 2.0 looks so much better.
I prefer to have HDR and freesync than RTX at this time. If that changes I will sell the 5700 xt and upgrade.
More likely I'll keep the rig as is and get a PS5 or XSX.
Sadly i don't play any of those games that currently has DLSS 2.0 needs much more widespread adoption
Not for me I play on a RTX 2080 Max-Q with DLSS 1080p to 4K Max setting with RTX on and it looks great.
i wonder if the console manufacturers could make their own implementation. That could allow for a good boost in performance / headroom for RT.
LOLSo on a 2060 4k goes from unplayable to "pretty nice". Can't wait for DLSS 2.0 to come to many more games... and with rey tracing features plz
