It will certainly be interesting to see what the 3xxx series does. I don't even have the money to care right now, and a 1080ti is still doing enough work with my backlog to last for 3 more years at the rate I finish games.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
NVIDIA RTX 20 SUPER Series
- Thread starter IgnotumCL
- Start date
Dictator Dark1x
I was reading that after the last Nvidia patch, several RTX games have improved, specially Battlefield V it seems that it runs much better with Ray Tracing now after an adittional DICE patch. Are you in favor in revisit some of those initial RTX titles and see if they have indeed improved?
I was reading that after the last Nvidia patch, several RTX games have improved, specially Battlefield V it seems that it runs much better with Ray Tracing now after an adittional DICE patch. Are you in favor in revisit some of those initial RTX titles and see if they have indeed improved?
Perhaps - but we do not necessarily always have the exact same data from the game from months or a year ago at this point.
Are there any thorough benchmarks out there for this game? I'm finding a couple hack jobs but nothing really well done.
It's a fun read but I need to see minimums (95th or 99%). Average framerates are useless imo.
Very tempted to nab a 2070 Super now in all honesty.
Just deciding between it and a 5700 XT, i'm wondering if I care enough about raytracing to pay another £60. It's just the fact that it tanks performance too much for me to enjoy it. You can't have your cake and eat it too with raytracing atm, at least at 1440p.
Just deciding between it and a 5700 XT, i'm wondering if I care enough about raytracing to pay another £60. It's just the fact that it tanks performance too much for me to enjoy it. You can't have your cake and eat it too with raytracing atm, at least at 1440p.
Still see no reason to upgrade from my Matrox Millennium card and that one was barely superior to my previous voodoo card.
After over a month of waiting, my ordered ASUS ROG Strix 2070 Super OC is still far far away. Caseking updated the product page... expected delivery date: "unknown". What the fuck, ASUS? I could also buy the A8G version but I want O8G.
Anyone with similar problems here?
Anyone with similar problems here?
Before anyone asks, he is reliable.
4608 CUDA cores is the full Turing TU102 chip that the Titan RTX also have.
And faster memory from 14 Gbps to 16 Gbps.
I just got a 2070 Super today and I'm pretty impressed with it overall. Playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order at 4K and Epic settings and getting 40-50fps which is good enough for me.
I'm coming from a Radeon VII which I'd been sorta using as a stop-gap via an eGPU but the heat and fan noise alone was enough to want to get off it even though on paper they're very evenly matched cards
I'm coming from a Radeon VII which I'd been sorta using as a stop-gap via an eGPU but the heat and fan noise alone was enough to want to get off it even though on paper they're very evenly matched cards
The price though. Are we getting a $2000 non-Titan GPU at last? It'll be at least $1500.
I'll be waiting for next gen, it's not that far.
With all the rumors about Ampere timing around computex next year, and this likely isn't out extremely soon, doesn't the timing feel weird? Based on the same rumors, Ampere is supposed to be better across the board and cheaper than 20XX series (we'll see on that one....) so where does that leave what would presumably be a $1500 GPU this time next year?
guess time will tell.
The RTX 2080Ti Super could launch at CES 2020 (January). The preview of rDNA 2 GPUs from AMD is also expected/rumored at CES 2020.
Ampere GPUs could launch at Computex 2020 (June).
gotta catch all the suckers before next-gen makes them price things better,
Half a year for selling a +5% update to a $1000+ GPU is more than enough to get all five of the sales.
They are bored out of their minds right now, and this is an update which will likely be even less impressive than 2080S - unless they'll cut the price of 2080TiS by some $300 or so.
Big navi rumors around that it will be shown at CES. This could just be nvidia trying to have its own announcement.
agreed agreed agreed.
I want so very badly for AMD to keep doing well and slowly make headway into top tier GPUs. Agree 100% on the NV being bored comment. They need someone to come eat some of their lunch in top tier so they get hungry again (I realize we've been saying that for years but it feels like AMD has really turned the corner in the last couple)
AMD overtaking nvidia in marketshare would be the best thing to happen to the gpu industry in many years. one can dream
AMD can only dream of having that much cheddar. hope Ryzen makes them enough money to splurge on GPU development
Not gonna happen. Nvidia has been 2 steps ahead for years
They have been so far out front of AMD.. they rolled out ray tracing.. were up against a manufacturing process wall. You realize they don't fab their own parts, right? But ok, sure need AMD to motivate them.
People are going to push this flawed narrative when Nvidia moves to 7nm. The performance increase will be thanks to AMD "making them sweat".
Last edited:
This guy is an idiot. This comment from the video says it all:
Going back to GCN feature set for the majority of the market would be the worst thing to happen to GPU industry since it has started. Also not sure what would be so great about AMD selling more GPUs than NV - but I don't care either way really.
LOL. I still remember how NV was "100% fucked" back when AMD got both PS4 and XBO.
sure, maybe "make them hungry again" is shitty phrasing but I don't think basic economics are debatable and if AMD was competitive in that segment, prices go down and quality goes up, with it only being upside for consumers.
In general I think this is true (prices no doubt at all).
Personally I'm amazed that Nvidia has pushed the high end as much as they have on the recent process nodes.
not RTX, but 1650 Super reviews are out (as well as one RX 5500 review)
Tech Power Up has a bunch of card reviews, they shouldn't be all that different in performance
Tech Power Up has a bunch of card reviews, they shouldn't be all that different in performance
Yeah it's absolutely fine from what I've played so far, and at 1440p to boot.
Me likey
So I RMA'd my 2060 Super FE and am waiting for the replacement. I've never had a GPU act so strange and I am wondering if my 450B Tomahawk motherboard could've been responsible.
The card started revving its fans up to full blast totally randomly. Most frequently on startup or on waking up from sleep but also during normal idling, or web browsing. Occasionally during gaming but not so often. Both fans would go to top speed and it would sound like a leafblower. This could last anywhere from 30 seconds to 20 minutes or more.
I tried every fix you can name. I removed and reinstalled the drivers several times. I tried different drivers. I took the card out and installed it again. I changed my monitor to 120 fps. I changed the power settings. Nothing helped. The fans would rev randomly. Sometimes short, sometimes long. There was no pattern.
The strangest thing about this is that when the fans were at full blast the hardware monitor would report that only 1 fan was spinning at 1500k. This was not true, I confirmed it visually multiple times. The fans would also not respond to manual fan curves.
Could the mobo bios have had an effect on this? It's running a 2018 version from before the 3 series Ryzens came out. CPU is a 5 2600x.
(might repost on the PC thread, as this one might be dead.)
The card started revving its fans up to full blast totally randomly. Most frequently on startup or on waking up from sleep but also during normal idling, or web browsing. Occasionally during gaming but not so often. Both fans would go to top speed and it would sound like a leafblower. This could last anywhere from 30 seconds to 20 minutes or more.
I tried every fix you can name. I removed and reinstalled the drivers several times. I tried different drivers. I took the card out and installed it again. I changed my monitor to 120 fps. I changed the power settings. Nothing helped. The fans would rev randomly. Sometimes short, sometimes long. There was no pattern.
The strangest thing about this is that when the fans were at full blast the hardware monitor would report that only 1 fan was spinning at 1500k. This was not true, I confirmed it visually multiple times. The fans would also not respond to manual fan curves.
Could the mobo bios have had an effect on this? It's running a 2018 version from before the 3 series Ryzens came out. CPU is a 5 2600x.
(might repost on the PC thread, as this one might be dead.)
Unlikely. Probably a faulty fan controller or something akin to this.
How good is the 2060 super? I just bought one for my rig and I feel like I'm playing most games on 4k ultra (Jedi Fallen Order/ COD MW/ RDR 2 somewhat)
How future proof is my card? What are my chances of playing cyberpunk at 4k 60fps?
How future proof is my card? What are my chances of playing cyberpunk at 4k 60fps?
I can't tell if this is real. Do you have settings turned down to nothing? This is a question that I'd ask about my 2080 Ti.
RDR 2 is a lot of settings on high/ultra.
Hold up let me try take some screens.
I seem to be running at 60 maybe with a few drops at 4k rez, but I'm not exactly sure how to get the frame rate counter up and running
Honestly havent noticed a difference in frames dropping or it feeling slow, but I am a mainly console player so maybe this might be placebo that im playing it at 60 lmao ... Let me drop down the settings and see if there's a difference in the feel of the game.
Are you using a frame counter or just guessing that its 60?
I'm guessing its 60 because it does feel super smooth while im on my horse or just in general tbh. How do I get the counter running on the game? sorry i'm completely new to pcs and pc gaming lol.
You are only guessing it, which makes sense. I have made a point in another thread that RDR 2 feels very smooth even at lower (35-40) framerates.