I have a 1080 Ti and I'm growing to resent it purely for the lack of DLSS hahaha. God I want that feature so bad. But I absolutely cannot justifying upgrading my GPU when next gen consoles are a few months from release.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
(NVIDIA) Cyberpunk 2077: Ray-Traced Effects Revealed, DLSS 2.0 Supported, Playable On GeForce NOW
- Thread starter kostacurtas
- Start date
I couldn't run Control with max Raytracing in stable 60FPS@1440p DLSS2 on 2070S. I highly doubt Cyberpunk will be less demanding.
Do we know the framerate of the demo? That run on a RTX2080TI and only at 1080p
He who is not allowed to be posted here said a 2080ti ran it at 70-80 fps with every setting on at 1080p.
Hope to run at 30fps 2560x1080 with Ray tracing on.
RTX2060, don't really want to spend on a new card with new consoles coming out at the same time!.
RTX2060, don't really want to spend on a new card with new consoles coming out at the same time!.
DLSS and integer scaling too. I want that clean 1080p 120hz on my 4K TV while I wait for HDMI 2.1 sets to arrive.
That's good to hear. Still doubt stable 60 fps at 1440p on a 2070S. 1080p to 1440p alone is a big performance hit and a 2080ti is what, like 30% more powerful than a 2070S?
But it will run fine on a 2070S with some fine tuning.
My 2080 Ti may have met it's match. I run 3440x1440 so I don't think I can even get 60 FPS at max settings with dlss 2.0.
I can already hear my wallet angrily screaming at me...
I can already hear my wallet angrily screaming at me...
I do not think RT reflections were available for the event - even though they are planned for launch.
Yeah that would have surely knocked it down even more. That said it was with dlss 2.0 on too
I'm waiting for reviews of Samsung Odyssey G7, on paper it seems great: curved 31.5'', 1440p, 240Hz (!), QLED ("quantum dots"), Freesync Premium Pro (G-Sync compatible), HDR 600.
This sounds just about perfect for me, the question is whether the colors, contrast and responsiveness are good in reality (hopefully, reviews will come soon).
I'm a firm believer in "more fps is better than higher resolution", so 1440p is perfect. It's completely clear that even with DLSS 2.0 even an RTX 3080Ti (or RTX 3090, whatever it's going to be called) won't deliver much higher fps than 60 at 4K in Cyberpunk 2077 (on ultra, with all raytracing features etc; I'm even doubting that 4K@60fps would be possible, actually), and for me 120fps vs 60fps is a much more noticeable difference than 4K vs 1440p.
This game support HDR? It better, and I can just imagine how it look in during night. Stunning, especially on OLED. ;).
One would think that something similar will no doubt be implemented eventually.
I want to run this at the lowest framerate possible so I can savour every frame. I hate running at high framerates because I miss so much detail as the frames whiz by.
Reflections are usually the most expensive RT effect, as it needs more rays per pixel to "reflect" an image. Shadows, SSAO and GI use a lot less rays than reflections. If one setting will tank performance, it will be reflections :/
I'm curious if the Geforce NOW version will link with a purchase from Steam or GOG. I'd be open to buying the game on either storefront, but would appreciate the option to play it either on my PC or through GFN.
I mean, of course, it's still RT :) But it's not the same to need 1 ray per 10x10 pixels than by 1x1
Can't wait to play this with 720p at 60fps but actually looking better than native 1080p!
Screenshots look gorgeous... now imagine those with less CA. Holly moly!
Screenshots look gorgeous... now imagine those with less CA. Holly moly!
My 1440p 144Hz PC monitor. VRR is godsend so I don't have to worry about uneven fps and when they drop a bit below 60 occasionally.
I have no concern of how my current GPU will run it...
More than anything I'm wondering how the next one will do.
What performances can be expected with a 3070/3080, I wonder.
More than anything I'm wondering how the next one will do.
What performances can be expected with a 3070/3080, I wonder.
Think about Geforce Now as renting an NVIDIA card from the cloud. Stadia/PS Now is more like renting a console
SkillUp claims he had RT in the demo he played (and that it's the " best implementation he's ever seen")
Supposedly all other, but reflection RT effects were up and running.
You trust him to spot the difference between SSR and RT reflections?
That's great. I assumed that it was going to support DLSS 2.0, but until now there was nothing concrete. This means that my goal of 1440p + ray tracing at 60fps+ should be easily attainable once Ampere arrives.
They were up, or they weren't up? He said he was playing at 1080p/60 with ray tracing, yet strangely enough the B-roll footage Digital Foundry got was 4K/30 with no ray tracing. Seems kind of odd to give out that footage now if ray tracing was already available.
And doesn't SSR have obvious artifacts when characters or other objects interact with them in some way?
They were up, or they weren't up? He said he was playing at 1080p/60 with ray tracing, yet strangely enough the B-roll footage Digital Foundry got was 4K/30 with no ray tracing. Seems kind of odd to give out that footage now if ray tracing was already available.
And doesn't SSR have obvious artifacts when characters or other objects interact with them in some way?
I feel we would've heard about it by now because it needs hardware support to run efficiently. If RDNA2 would have something like Tensor cores then I feel AMD or one of the console makers would've advertised it already. I doubt they're keeping it a secret.
Or maybe you're talking about methods to upscale in general then we already have something like this on consoles: checkerboard rendering or even temporal upscaling.
Supposedly all other RT'd effects, BUT reflections were up and running. Reflections were off and disabled from options. I think that some German PC gaming site mentioned this when they looked at settings? Also DLSS 2 was on.
This was for those who were doing hands-on event with on-site hardware. I don't think anyone who did remote with GF Now have commented on RT.
Yes, SSR does cause all kinds of artifacts and break into reflections. I just question if SkillUp is knowledgeable enough to spot that or to know difference?
Honestly have no idea, hence why I wrote "claims". He's also the only one (that I saw) who didn't play over streaming, so perhaps thing's are different?
It's also probably going to require at least a 2080 Ti, but more likely the upcoming cards to run at a decent frame rate above 1080p even with DLSS 2.0.
Next gen games will look even better than this once developers start building game with mesh shader, VRS,SFS and RT from the ground up. Don't worry about that.
No doubt, but none of those super huge budget games will be above 30fps either with all of the heaviest graphical effects active, and we might not even see any until three or four years in. The next-gen Cyberpunk should obviously look really good on the consoles, but I seriously doubt they will have everything optimized by launch for them to run most of these effects at a similar level without a massive frame rate hit.
Hell, the game might even be too demanding on the best Ampere card to have all of the effects on at all times and at a good detail. It might be similar to TW2's "Ubersampling" in that regard.
Jesus Christ. What's it gonna take for me to run this game on high/very high at 3440x1440p and 60fps I wonder. Was hoping that a 3070 would do the trick, even if it's on the same wavelength as a 2080S, but maybe not?...
Guess we just gotta wait for concrete details on these cards.
Guess we just gotta wait for concrete details on these cards.
New upscaling techniques could be in the works. I'm not saying we're getting DLSS, but maybe something that can achieve a similar boost.