I could see miners figuring this out with XSX and it's dev mode :).The PS5 thing was fake, though I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up happening.
I wasn't believing that this would end in 2021, but looks like it might take longer into 2022
I could see miners figuring this out with XSX and it's dev mode :).The PS5 thing was fake, though I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up happening.
I wasn't believing that this would end in 2021, but looks like it might take longer into 2022
Banning won't work. Having most jurisdictions prohibit publicly traded company from owning bitcoins would be a start (including ETFs). Also having utilities charge them consumer rates for electricity, not industry rates. The problems solve itself once the bubble deflates.
Oh, my bad.
All this price hiking happened with the 10xx series already. But not to this extend I believe. Also I cant remember how long it took before prices went back to normal then.
I am more concerned though that all of this will lead to permanently raised prices.
Manufacturers see that people pay those ridiculous prices so why not raise prices with the next series?!
I am more concerned though that all of this will lead to permanently raised prices.
Manufacturers see that people pay those ridiculous prices so why not raise prices with the next series?!
But the clickbaits!
The fact that the trottling is for ETH only always seemed a bit weird. There are many other coins which could be just as profitable for mining.
That's too wide of a reach though and would likely lead to worse performance outside of mining - not something any vendor would want to do.Like I said earlier in the thread, if you really want to get people to stop buying consumer cards for commercial use, the solution is to make the limitations time-based rather than algorithm-based.
Have cards start throttling after X hours of high-power-use per month. If the limit were set at an average of 8 hours per day, the vast majority of consumers would not be affected, but the break-even point for miners would triple or more. Even a lot of business users who need GPUs for work would still be fine with that limit.
Some consumers may have a psychological aversion to buying a limited card, but you could just promise to release a firmware that removes the limit once the current crisis is over.
Like I said earlier in the thread, if you really want to get people to stop buying consumer cards for commercial use, the solution is to make the limitations time-based rather than algorithm-based.
Have cards start throttling after X hours of high-power-use per month. If the limit were set at an average of 8 hours per day, the vast majority of consumers would not be affected, but the break-even point for miners would triple or more. Even a lot of business users who need GPUs for work would still be fine with that limit.
Some consumers may have a psychological aversion to buying a limited card, but you could just promise to release a firmware that removes the limit once the current crisis is over.
That's too wide of a reach though and would likely lead to worse performance outside of mining - not something any vendor would want to do.
I'm anti-mining but that would be going too far, if I pay over 1000€ for a GPU I want to be able to game with it 24/7 if I wish to.
This is really.... some "effort" on Nvidia's part. They couldn't be even bothered to lock the bios or anything. What an epic fail.Lol. Nvidia removing limiter on the 3060 themselves in a driver release. So much for combating miners.NVIDIA GeForce 470.05 driver confirmed to remove GeForce RTX 3060 ETH mining limiter - VideoCardz.com
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060’s unhackable mining limiter has been hacked Two German publications have now confirmed that simply by using a special driver, the Ethereum limiter appears to be nonfunctional. NVIDIA announced that their new mid-range RTX 3060 graphics card will have a built-in anti...videocardz.com