-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
[NSFW] So Bunny Ayumi is a pedophile/pedophile adjacent.
- Thread starter Hexcalibur
- Start date
You did make a sweeping statement about Jessica promoting Shadman, and even I had to look that up.
She cosplayed as his rendition of Kylo Ren
People think you saying her crediting his work for a cosplay she did is her condoning his views
OP
OP
I know y'all not arguing the merit of Link's age right now lmfaoooo
Shiiiit, I wish it was a joke but she regularly pushes this weird shit.
Shiiiit, I wish it was a joke but she regularly pushes this weird shit.
I mean, Bunny thinking is shit, and she should hold be accountable. But she doesn't have a audience or platform here (and it wouldn't surprise me if this is the first thread dedicated to her in the forum), which bring me thought the OP may have some other motives. I apologize to Hexcalibur about that.
I like the idea about reframing the thread about the problem and the culture associated to Bunny, but no to Bunny herself.
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
So do other Nazis and Nazi apologists like ArmouredSkeptic, Chris Ray Gun, sh0eonhead, Count Dankula, psychicpebbles, OneyNG, and then others like iDubbbz, Guru Larry, and Egoraptor. I had no idea so many collaborated and followed this neo Nazi pedophile. I don't know if Shadman has been arrested yet, he fled Switzerland from police investigating his pedophilia.
I've posted this image before and got a warning for it but fuck, It's still 100% accurate.
Nah, fuck that.
User banned (permanent): defending pedophilia
Oof. Well this is a minefield of a topic, and I know nothing about the people involved, but here's my two cents.
On one hand, yeah sexualizing depicted minors is creepy taken at face value. But I think there's some truth to the fact that these aren't real people. You can draw a person and say they're 12 or 20, the intention really doesn't matter, it all comes down to depiction and interpretation. It's fine if that makes you uncomfortable, that's everyone's call to make, but does that make you a pedo or pedo-adjacent? That seems pretty harsh imo, and kind of oblivious to the reality of the situation. Let's not forget that they're fictitious depictions of imaginary people. Bottom line for me is if it's not leading you to sexualize real children, or see children in a sexual light, it shouldn't be seen as a problem. And of course with everything that's within reasonable limits.
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
On one hand, yeah sexualizing depicted minors is creepy taken at face value. But I think there's some truth to the fact that these aren't real people. You can draw a person and say they're 12 or 20, the intention really doesn't matter, it all comes down to depiction and interpretation. It's fine if that makes you uncomfortable, that's everyone's call to make, but does that make you a pedo or pedo-adjacent? That seems pretty harsh imo, and kind of oblivious to the reality of the situation. Let's not forget that they're fictitious depictions of imaginary people. Bottom line for me is if it's not leading you to sexualize real children, or see children in a sexual light, it shouldn't be seen as a problem. And of course with everything that's within reasonable limits.
And on another note, am I crazy for feeling heartwarmed by the notion of women sexualizing shotas? Men have been getting off to lolis for decades, time for some sexual equality in this fandom!
Aren't you thinking about TP Link?
Althought that would be more like 10 017 yo or something :p
Why's it in gaming? Not contesting her fairly repellent proclivities but what's it got to do with gaming? She's not a gamedev and seems to be famous for being an anime cosplayer. Her only link to gaming seems to be she enjoys it as a hobby and was harassed by a gamedev. Are you planning to make a string of posts about how the various victims of game devs harassment are also shitty people?
For me it's like pointing out someone is inferior and invalidates them just because of their avatar
ummm yes? If your response to pedophile adjacent behavior that impacts you is to applaud pedophile adjacent behavior that others exhibit, I would define that as a problem. I think the right answer is to be appalled it's accepted anywhere.
I think there is a lot of confusion going on here.
I pointed out that she too promoted him/is friends with him as a negative. It is a bad thing.
No one before you replied to me because they had a problem with me making that sweeping statement.
Linking directly to his Twitter and promoting it is condoning his views. One single click of his profile shows you how vile he is.
Shadman was a prolific content creator in those early days of newground/youtube animation. You'd be surprised about how many people have worked with him
Dude, i can go back to my late teen years (im 35) and i clearly remember girls from my manga circle fawning for shotas.
Lolis are more prominent, but both are at least that old
OP
OP
She's also a gaming streamer. Why would I make that thread when there's already one regarding her situation and the staff said to make a separate thread regarding this. Did you even read the thread lol?
Edit: and I've also already said if the staff feels this belongs in etc they can put it there. Maybe read next time before asking questions already answered numerous times throughout the thread.
What the fuck?
This thread bringing all the just cartoons to the yard.
User Banned (3 Months): Dismissing the sexualized depictions of minors
Peoples extreme attraction to cartoons is definitely creepy as shit but calling someone a pedophile is really a bit much. If she's been caught passing around child porn then thats another thing entirely.
Yeah WTF are people posting defending sexualisation of minors here?
We're both right :p
Of course you would say that you no-avatar you
Ugh disgusting.
- Mike Z is an idiot
- Being so categorical when it comes to cartoons is silly. Saying there's no CP in cartoons is stupid. At least be aware and recognize there's a line somewhere in there, even if not everyone agrees where it is.
- I don't follow the yellow face part. I don't think she looks asian at all in her pics. She clearly is inspired by the aesthetics but beyond some weaboo make up I don't see the issue? Would love to see what I'm missing.
- Mike Z is an idiot
- Being so categorical when it comes to cartoons is silly. Saying there's no CP in cartoons is stupid. At least be aware and recognize there's a line somewhere in there, even if not everyone agrees where it is.
- I don't follow the yellow face part. I don't think she looks asian at all in her pics. She clearly is inspired by the aesthetics but beyond some weaboo make up I don't see the issue? Would love to see what I'm missing.
OP
OP
No? I get the yellowface when it comes to her photos and makeup, but pointing to the nick too is just ridiculous
No it's not. Not ridiculous at all. Sexualizing children is sexualizing children. What's the difference if it's drawn?
1. It does. Pedophile isn't a person who sexually abuses a child. A pedophile is a mentally ill person who is sexually atracted to kids.
A pedophile may never become an abuser, but being attracted to sexual depiction of kids absolutely makes you a pedo.
2. I can't say if you're crazy or just extremely disgusting.
OP
OP
What the fuck did i just read.
Cancel 2020. This is too much.
