Best of luck. Even if it turns out to be something else, getting that sick is awful.I am into day 7 of symptoms. I cannot emphasise how awful it is if you contract this it is far worse than any cold or fever I've experienced.
Started with a very strong headache for 2 days and I was able to sleep for over 12 hours. Then evolved into a fever which comes in waves. Some days I wake up drenched in sweat. Then the blocked nose starts and extremely sharp body pains.
I'm worried it hasn't reached the potential pneumonia stage. I have been told I qualify for a test due to underlying health issues but I am otherwise a reasonably fit 37 year old. I can't imagine what it must be like for old people to contract it.
I quote you, but this is for the whole thread. The situation is scary, but you need to stop with the fear and panic. Potential permanent lung damage is a complication which MAYBE could arise. Like if you break your leg you could MAYBE need walking aids in some form for the rest of your life.
Like the other poster said, young, healthy people have like a 0,1% chance of dying. Many diseases have a chance of complications and you dying from them.
This is not to downplay anything, but people here seem to think they get this Virus and die. It is VERY unlikely that you die. This situation is super serious because everybody >50 is in serious danger and that is a HUGE amount of people. Also countries with bad Health systems are at risk to completly collapse.
The model was flawed according to peer review because it doesn't consider aggressive method which is...Isn't that 12-18 month time frame floating around from the Imperial College model? Because that's what these articles keep citing.
But then there was an article earlier in this thread saying the model was flawed.
This link: https://necsi.edu/review-of-ferguson-et-al-impact-of-non-pharmaceutical-interventions
The report was posted earlier chances are you will regret looking at it.What are the chances there was a mortality section in that report?
I'm still confused about wether or not you can get it again after having gotten and recovered from it. Shouldn't we know the answer to this by now? Cause if you can keep getting reinfected that's kinda a game changer.
My brewery is basically open for takeout cans and hand sanitizer that we make on the distillery side. We are SUPER conscious about distancing and how many people are in (though it's mostly community organizations getting sanitizer.) Wild times.
Get the test to confirm. I've had weird symptoms but no one will allow me to get a test because I'm not having extreme health state. It's good for you to confirm that you've had it, in your case.I am into day 7 of symptoms. I cannot emphasise how awful it is if you contract this it is far worse than any cold or fever I've experienced.
Started with a very strong headache for 2 days and I was able to sleep for over 12 hours. Then evolved into a fever which comes in waves. Some days I wake up drenched in sweat. Then the blocked nose starts and extremely sharp body pains.
I'm worried it hasn't reached the potential pneumonia stage. I have been told I qualify for a test due to underlying health issues but I am otherwise a reasonably fit 37 year old. I can't imagine what it must be like for old people to contract it.
What are the chances there was a mortality section in that report?
The CDC says guidelines must clearly state that workers in medical facilities where aerosolized environments are likely should wear facemasks when dealing with patients.
Don Lemon says 6118 cases now. This puts us ahead of Italy's curve now, no?
You can't compare the United States and Italy. They're not 1-to-1 in terms of size or population. You need to compare by region/state.
The US is far behind on testing as well making comparisons with any country very difficult.
isnt the problem we dont know b/c of lack of testing? all that being said our younger population will help a bit.I really just don't want the idea that the US's trajectory being worse than Italy being spread around because it's not necessarily true.
isnt the problem we dont know b/c of lack of testing? all that being said our younger population will help a bit.
hell even mitt romaney was pushing for it a few days ago. you dont need a econ degree at this point we are diving head first in to a depression.
in short the WHO kits were never realy a option for the US, WHO protizises poor nations that cant make their own.
the artcle confirms china, hong kong, and south korea all developed their own kits.I don't know about that. Sounds like a bad excuse to try to make it seem like we don't have enough test.
Do we know which countries WHO sent it to? I feel like they definitely sent some to China which is definitely not impoverished. South Korea probably got a few kits too but I wouldn't say they're impoverished either
https://mobile.twitter.com/jeremycyoung/status/1239975682643357696 this guy sums it upWhat are the chances there was a mortality section in that report?
I think the review is wrong to conclude the original report did not consider these. The original report states this:The model was flawed according to peer review because it doesn't consider aggressive method which is...
1. Aggressive contact tracing and quarantine to remove potential infectious source before symptoms appear
2. Aggressive door to door monitoring and testing to find out hidden patient
The measures used to achieve suppression might also evolve over time. As case numbers fall, it becomes more feasible to adopt intensive testing, contact tracing and quarantine measures akin to the strategies being employed in South Korea today
the artcle confirms china, hong kong, and south korea all developed their own kits.
I'll be curious to hear which is the bigger seller. Tempted to drive into the city and hit up some of our breweries for crowlers to keep them going, but I know that's not a great idea. I wish they could have it delivered but I'm pretty sure that's against the law.
Social distancing doesn't mean total isolation.I gotta be honest with you, as a single man living in an apartment, I don't think I can make it "18 months" without seeing my friends or family in person.
Then the US fucked up bad, real bad. The fact we had so many defective tests is astounding. Sucks that we cant buy some of the WHO tests but in glad there are states independently testing it since the CDC isn't willing to actthe artcle confirms china, hong kong, and south korea all developed their own kits.
We won't end up totally isolated. I live alone as well and do understand your concern.I gotta be honest with you, as a single man living in an apartment, I don't think I can make it "18 months" without seeing my friends or family in person.
Probably deserves its own thread. This is terrifying
(that number goes to 2m)
The US needs to go into lockdown for 2-3 weeks, use this time to work overtime to catch up and find all cases, quarantine these people and their families, and continue for at least two months with social distancing.
Pretty sure even in Wuhan they kept grocery stores open.good luck, people need to get food, maintain infrastructure ect. china could pull it off in wuhan with the help of deliver companies to dilivers food ect to everyone in isolation. amazon is big, but not that big.
the part that he highlights, which is worrisome and possible to me, is how successful suppression will or could lead to people letting their guard down, to the people who claimed this is all a hoax feeling vindicated, causing everything to be undone again in the fall.
good luck, people need to get food, maintain infrastructure ect. china could pull it off in wuhan with the help of deliver companies to dilivers food ect to everyone in isolation. amazon is big, but not that big.
They did. They set up monitoring stations and took temperature readings before letting people in. The problem in the US at least is our fierce independence mentality is not that great when it comes to public health crises. Doubt this would even be possible in a lot of places, but epicenters might be the most important place to do this after an initial 14 day period.
Are you assuming it won't spread during the summer months? Seems like it's spreading just fine in Australia where it's late summer.I feel like we will resort to lockdown waves, which isn't really reflected in that article. Theres no way we will be in a full lockdown come June. I think there will be a gradual lifting in the summer only for us to do it all over again in the fall, hopefully by winter treatment is widely available (also not discussed in that article).
Yeah, this is what I'm hoping. Thankfully we're all staying in touch through various technology, but nothing compares to the real thing.We won't end up totally isolated. I live alone as well and do understand your concern.
It can't come down to total isolation. The cost to mental health would end up being enormous.
For sure. I'm just scared to even visit my parents since they're in their 60s.
(that number goes to 2m)
The US needs to go into lockdown for 2-3 weeks, use this time to work overtime to catch up and find all cases, quarantine these people and their families, and continue for at least two months with social distancing.
This seems to be the study that the US government is now looking to. Like I've said before, "flatten the curve" is a terrible idea and suppression and containment within the US seems to work out better and faster than I even hoped.
Are you assuming it won't spread during the summer months? Seems like it's spreading just fine in Australia where it's late summer.
So he is basically saying this is the end of America?