I feel like in these discussions there are often misunderstandings because different people actually MEAN different things because they often do not specify in enough detail what they are trying to convey.
I think it is import to clarify that when we are talking about the situation right NOW in this instant, then yes, of course the flu is more dangerous than this because the flu is still a LOT more prevalent around the world (more people infected).
What a lot of people actually MEAN though when they say this is more dangerous than the flu is the potential this has in comparison to the flu!
We already know the more or less "maximum extent" of the flu since it pretty much HAS already spread worldwide (albeit with different strains, mutations, and varying degrees of spread each year etc. but you get the basic idea)
Now, if Covid-19 is allowed so achieve that SAME prevalence in the world than the flu, then it will absolutely be more dangerous to the world as a whole since it causes a higher percentage of fatalities.
This is all assuming that health care systems CAN handle the influx of patients all of a sudden, in case they cannot, the sky is the limit in terms of damage this thing can cause, which is mainly why it is extremely important to contain and delay this from happening as good as we possibly can. This is also now where the main challenge lies and why everyone must work together to achieve this common goal.
This is all very true, but in the discussion I was talking about no-one actually argued the flu is worse than COVID. Just that comparing the death rate at the moment is not really reliable