• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Gpsych

Member
May 20, 2019
2,895
Welp, two cases in Colorado. No way I'm going to the zoo this weekend in Denver. Really hope this thing doesn't make it to Ft. Collins, but I imagine it definitely will at some point.
 

fellsine

Member
Apr 17, 2018
507
You can show this to those who still argue "It's just the flu":

ESY3wc1XkAEGc8d
isn't that BS to not have flu split up into the same categories as covid-19?
 

roflwaffles

Member
Oct 30, 2017
4,138
When I came back from Thailand/Taiwan on Sunday, the US customs screening was extremely lax. No heat signature test, no asking if I had been to China like Thailand and Taiwan did, I basically just walked though it like it was nothing.

US fucking up.
 

Chikor

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
14,239
When I came back from Thailand/Taiwan on Sunday, the US customs screening was extremely lax. No heat signature test, no asking if I had been to China like Thailand and Taiwan did, I basically just walked though it like it was nothing.

US fucking up.
It is crazy to me that the US still don't have infrared fever screenings at international airports.
This is something that broke ass countries manage to afford.
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,763
Not for sure what your getting at. We can absolutely compare them right now and we know for a fact that is what the death rates look like

No we can't. We swab so many people for the flu so the percent that die is much lower than when we are simply mainly swabbing people that are critically ill. It is also why the mortality rates seem much higher in the US compared to South Korea. South Korea is being much more liberal with testing than the US is so when there is a death in the US, the percent mortality is more affected.

Once testing reaches the same levels as the flu swabs, the comparisons will be better.
 

roflwaffles

Member
Oct 30, 2017
4,138
It is crazy to me that the US still don't have infrared fever screenings at international airports.
This is something that broke ass countries manage to afford.

I was in Thailand for a bachelor party and literally every club we went to had infrared screenings before you could come in. A major US airport not bothering to do it at all is shameful.
 

Bookkoo

Member
Apr 9, 2018
683
I have cardiovascular disease so I'm at the top end when it comes to risk. I have to be worried. Both my parents are elderly and not exactly in the best health. The fact covid19 is asymptomatic is the real worrying part. I would hate to spread it to the elderly folks like mine and accidentally end up being the cause of their death.

I have cardiovascular disease mate and I'm choosing not to let worry run my life. Try not to let it get the best of you :)
 

Chikor

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
14,239
I was in Thailand for a bachelor party and literally every club we went to had infrared screenings before you could come in. A major US airport not bothering to do it at all is shameful.
I'm in Seattle and there is still zero screening anywhere.
They tell people to measure their temperature and call their primary care physician if they have fever.
That's crazy.
Those things aren't expensive, not for a country as rich as the US.
 

Thewonandonly

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
4,249
Utah
Damn I'm going to wendover this Monday so I'm a little worried. I'm driving there so travel won't be to bad just a casino and hotel seem like a giant cesspool. I'll bring hand sanitizer and be extremely careful.

Also in Utah about 30 minutes away from SLC how worries should I be to work out at the gym? I'm 23 and smoke weed so I'm pretty sure I'll be fine besides the smoking part... Anyway should I be to concerned about the gym or should I continue getting RIPPED!!!!!
 

MasterChumly

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,903
No we can't. We swab so many people for the flu so the percent that die is much lower than when we are simply mainly swabbing people that are critically ill. It is also why the mortality rates seem much higher in the US compared to South Korea. South Korea is being much more liberal with testing than the US is so when there is a death in the US, the percent mortality is more affected.
Stop spreading misinformation. That come from a massive study in China analyzing their cases. The WHO confirmed that there isn't mysteriously a bunch of cases out there not found as well. Stop acting like trump.
 

RoKKeR

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,387
twitter.com

Julia Lindau on Twitter

“I just landed at JFK after reporting on #coronavirus in Milan and Lombardy —the epicenter of Italy’s outbreak— for @vicenews. I walked right through US customs. They didn’t ask me where in Italy I went or if I came into contact with sick people. They didn’t ask me anything.”

Maybe already posted, but people returning from the epicenter of the virus aren't getting screened in the US at all. Have to think that we have way more cases than the testing would let us believe. Jesus Christ.
 

Typhon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,115
Stop spreading misinformation. That come from a massive study in China analyzing their cases. The WHO confirmed that there isn't mysteriously a bunch of cases out there not found as well. Stop acting like trump.

Then explain why the virus has been circulating in the US for 6 weeks and we only started noticing now. There are mild cases, there has to be.
 

MasterChumly

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,903
So why can't those mild cases be missed?
Because the CDC refused to test people? I mean it's been the top story for the past week. There were literally multiple people that died at the life care center in Kirkland before they started testing people. If you have shit testing procedures then your going to miss people spreading it.
 

Inquisitive_Ghost

Cranky Ghost Pokemon
Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,126
It's highly contagious. There is no vaccine and no immunity. It has a mortality rate above 2%. The Spanish Flu had a mortality rate of 2% and it devastated humanity, just for perspective. COVID-19 is potentially a massive, massive, massive problem.
No, the Spanish Flu did not have a kill rate of only 2%. The second wave that made it famous had a kill rate of 10-20%. There is conflicting data on this because of a paper that appears to have presented the math in a confusing way at best, if not entirely messing it up. There was a good Twitter thread linked earlier in either this thread or the previous one on it, but if you take the upper bound of estimated deaths of 50 million from the Spanish Flu and divide by the alleged kill rate of 2%, you get more than the entire world population at the time. And the virus didn't even infect 100% of the people in the world in 1918. So it can't have been as low as only 2%. (Using the lower bound of 20 million doesn't get numbers that make sense either).
 

Deleted member 48991

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 24, 2018
753
Then explain why the virus has been circulating in the US for 6 weeks and we only started noticing now. There are mild cases, there has to be.
Until recently they haven't been testing people who don't have a travel history to China (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/02/27/health/us-cases-coronavirus-community-transmission/index.html). At this point though there are already multiple generations of community transmission (https://bedford.io/blog/ncov-cryptic-transmission/).
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,763
Stop spreading misinformation. That come from a massive study in China analyzing their cases. The WHO confirmed that there isn't mysteriously a bunch of cases out there not found as well. Stop acting like trump.

wow at the hostility. What the fuck does Trump have to do with what I said. I didn't see that those numbers were based on the Chinese data. If so the numbers are probably closer to the real numbers for China but you are also comparing mortality rates in another country that was completely overwhelmed by the outbreak. The mortality rate is likely going to continue shifting as the virus continues to spread. In the US, the virus is very likely out there we just aren't testing everyone that exhibits viral symptoms.

there are many factors that affect mortality rates and it's not so easy to do a direct comparison. I still posit that we won't know the true mortality rate until the 'season' is over with. Just take a look at mortality rates of the flu by country and see how they vary.

I am not saying that people shouldn't worry, but the panic is a little out of control.
 

Zyrokai

Member
Nov 1, 2017
4,253
Columbus, Ohio
No, the Spanish Flu did not have a kill rate of only 2%. The second wave that made it famous had a kill rate of 10-20%. There is conflicting data on this because of a paper that appears to have presented the math in a confusing way at best, if not entirely messing it up. There was a good Twitter thread linked earlier in either this thread or the previous one on it, but if you take the upper bound of estimated deaths of 50 million from the Spanish Flu and divide by the alleged kill rate of 2%, you get more than the entire world population at the time. And the virus didn't even infect 100% of the people in the world in 1918. So it can't have been as low as only 2%. (Using the lower bound of 20 million doesn't get numbers that make sense either).


So like....... How exactly did the Spanish flu go away? And can Covid-19 19 also go away in the same way?
 

Accident

Member
Oct 28, 2017
43
5 confirmed cases here in Houston so far, and they are all connected to a trip to Egypt.

What makes a possible underreported outbreak in Egypt more concerning is that temperatures in Cairo and most tourist destinations in Egypt have been close to 80F. Warmer than most places with confirmed outbreaks.
 
Oct 27, 2017
7,694
People should really stop fucking traveling for business and pleasure for a while if it is absolutely not necessary.

This bullshit is really starting to get into selfish territory now.
 

MasterChumly

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,903
wow at the hostility. What the fuck does Trump have to do with what I said. I didn't see that those numbers were based on the Chinese data. If so the numbers are probably closer to the real numbers for China but you are also comparing mortality rates in another country that was completely overwhelmed by the outbreak. The mortality rate is likely going to continue shifting as the virus continues to spread. In the US, the virus is very likely out there we just aren't testing everyone that exhibits viral symptoms.

there are many factors that affect mortality rates and it's not so easy to do a direct comparison. I still posit that we won't know the true mortality rate until the 'season' is over with. Just take a look at mortality rates of the flu by country and see how they vary.

I am not saying that people shouldn't worry, but the panic is a little out of control.
I said you were acting like trump because you are. Literally making up information to downplay the situation and downplay the CFR. While it will vary from country to country and adjust over time we know for an undisputed fact that it is significantly worse than the flu. Downplaying the situation is just as bad as people panicking and literally leads to mass panic because they have been misinformed previously
 

Arebours

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,656
No, the Spanish Flu did not have a kill rate of only 2%. The second wave that made it famous had a kill rate of 10-20%. There is conflicting data on this because of a paper that appears to have presented the math in a confusing way at best, if not entirely messing it up. There was a good Twitter thread linked earlier in either this thread or the previous one on it, but if you take the upper bound of estimated deaths of 50 million from the Spanish Flu and divide by the alleged kill rate of 2%, you get more than the entire world population at the time. And the virus didn't even infect 100% of the people in the world in 1918. So it can't have been as low as only 2%. (Using the lower bound of 20 million doesn't get numbers that make sense either).
I listened to a virology lecture the other day where the professor said Spanish flu had a death rate of 2%. I think that number was derived from people who received treatment so while the actual death rate might have been 10% when comparing to the modern world maybe 2% is more accurate.

Then explain why the virus has been circulating in the US for 6 weeks and we only started noticing now. There are mild cases, there has to be.
if it doubles once every 6 days and we start with one person then after six weeks we have roughly 128 cases. that seems reasonable considering probably less than 1/3 are detected.
 
Last edited:

Artifex

Member
Dec 6, 2017
10
All international travel must be stopped now. People will not do it voluntarily. Each state will have to do it for themselves. This seems drastic, but there are too many unknown risks. We don't know how many cases are out there in countries (including the US) which are not doing enough testing. International travel is just creating new opportunities to confuse and overwhelm the healthcare system in places which community spread is already happening.
 

Calamari41

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,099
Man the amount of irrational fear I'm seeing about this is nuts. I remember sars being just as bad but it never went to this level. Even Ebola which I would argue is even worse never Caused this much panic. My question given all that we know now about the mortality rate is why still all the panic?

The main fear stems from the fact that people don't get symptoms for 2-4 weeks after they have the virus. It's significantly easier to spread that way. The other diseases you mentioned are only spread when you're already really sick, so you're a lot more likely to be far from other people. With this, you could spread it incredibly easily for a solid month and not know you're doing it.

Someone normal you shook hands with in early February could have given it to you, and in turn you could have been giving it to at-risk people this whole time.
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,763
I said you were acting like trump because you are. Literally making up information to downplay the situation and downplay the CFR. While it will vary from country to country and adjust over time we know for an undisputed fact that it is significantly worse than the flu. Downplaying the situation is just as bad as people panicking and literally leads to mass panic because they have been misinformed previously

I'm not acting like Trump at all. You are being unnecessarily hostile here. I am also not downplaying the situation, I'm trying to explain why the rates right now can't be directly compared.

Look at the COVID mortality rates in South Korea someone just posted for instance.

there is still a lot we don't know about the virus.
 

Geeko

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,193
San Jose, CA
My wife works for a Day Care system with multiple locations here in San Jose. One of the other locations here had a teacher that tested positive for the Covid-19. Fortunately that teacher has not been in since February 28th and health county officials has deemed it as a non contagious event. As a precautionary measure, they've immediately shut down that location for cleaning and won't be open till next week.

This just rings a little close to home for comfort. We've both received phone calls and texts from pretty much every local family member asking us if we're ok. We just keep reassuring them that it was one of the other Action Day locations. Whew.
 

Jarmel

The Jackrabbit Always Wins
Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,338
New York
All international travel must be stopped now. People will not do it voluntarily. Each state will have to do it for themselves. This seems drastic, but there are too many unknown risks. We don't know how many cases are out there in countries (including the US) which are not doing enough testing. International travel is just creating new opportunities to confuse and overwhelm the healthcare system in places which community spread is already happening.
Shutting down all international travel would cause a global depression overnight.
 

Inquisitive_Ghost

Cranky Ghost Pokemon
Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,126
I listened to a virology lecture the other day where the professor said Spanish flu had a death rate of 2%. I think that number was derived from people who received treatment so while the actual death rate might have been 10% when comparing to the modern world maybe 2% is more accurate.
Here we go, I found it:
twitter.com

Ferris Jabr on Twitter

“Many people are claiming that the new coronavirus is as deadly as the 1918 Spanish flu, citing a case fatality rate (CFR) of ~2.5% The truth is that this comparison is, at best, highly unreliable, and may be completely wrong. Here's why:”

This seems a likely explanation to me.
 

Arebours

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,656
Here we go, I found it:
twitter.com

Ferris Jabr on Twitter

“Many people are claiming that the new coronavirus is as deadly as the 1918 Spanish flu, citing a case fatality rate (CFR) of ~2.5% The truth is that this comparison is, at best, highly unreliable, and may be completely wrong. Here's why:”

This seems a likely explanation to me.
Yeah, it's a messy thing comparing the death rates of different diseases separated by a century.
 

Halbrand

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,616
Yeah, but it also sounds like they're really on top of things.
I think it has been shown that decisive action in the early stages can be very effective in containing this, and I hope they pull through.
Yeah, all his contacts were quarantined.

We can't give up on contact tracing, and lots of respect to the people who do it.
 

Ether_Snake

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
11,306
I'm not sure a fatality rate can be considered any more accurate for the common cold. In both cases mild cases would be unlikely to be reported. The fatality rate is always relative to cases were symptoms are strong enough for the infection to be identified. So the current fatality rate for covid is probably as accurate as the common flu's own rate, if not even more accurate in countries like South Korea where identification of infection from covid is probably currently higher than the common cold.

The more debilitating the impact of the disease the more likely it is to be identified and hence the more accurate the stats will be.
 

Owl

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,139
California
All international travel must be stopped now. People will not do it voluntarily. Each state will have to do it for themselves. This seems drastic, but there are too many unknown risks. We don't know how many cases are out there in countries (including the US) which are not doing enough testing. International travel is just creating new opportunities to confuse and overwhelm the healthcare system in places which community spread is already happening.
The massive economic downturn that would cause would end up killing way more people than the virus will.
 

Chan

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,334
Just landed and been looking at flights. I'm gonna book another flight at these prices.