• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Clefargle

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,156
Limburg
Nobody because game development is hard and throwing tantrums and harassing people isn't the solution.

Criticising mismanagement isn't throwing a tantrum. Some people have very clearly articulated their problem with GF and aren't being babies. So maybe don't tar all of us with your broad brush
 

SerTapTap

Member
Oct 27, 2017
70
I don't get why this keeps being brought up; when people are upset at "gamefreak" it's just like when people blame "activision" for a game made by, for example, Treyarch. Yeah, it's oversimplifying but everyone knows what they mean and it's barely incorrect in a meaningful context. In fact, Activision tells them what to do anyway, and determining exact blame any given issue in a game between it's publisher and developer can be nearly impossible--and publishers will never help you clear that up.

It's a subsidiary company of the same company people are mad at, doing the thing people are mad at, being paid exclusively by the people they're mad at. This is pedantic at best.

Since Pokémon CG Studio was established, every single Pokémon game, including spin-offs and mobile titles, use the same 3D models provided by them. If Pokémon CG Studio doesn't have a 3D model ready for Game Freak, there's nothing GF can do.

This makes no sense for various reasons. They're literally a company whose job is to make the models, what do you mean "there's nothing GF can do". This is like saying Xbox did Y, there's nothing Microsoft can do. Also, they already have the models? Like, Pokemon Masters just game out. They're the 3DS game models. They still have them. They were designed to be reused.
 

udivision

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,038
I guess it would've been interesting if GF had thrown them under the bus or something, but I feel like this information doesn't really matter to the DeX debate.
 

Terraforce

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
18,939
It's not that the series would collapse and more so that a huge amount of things planned and unrevealed to the public would have to be shifted around.
And that just happens sometimes. Delays in general result in large amounts of planning being scrapped or altered entirely. The Inazuma Eleven games were supposed to be made on pace with the anime and merchandise in their marketing strategy, but I sure as hell am glad they delayed the project rather than releasing a lesser work.

It's so silly that some people are willing to give GF any kind of excuse seemingly.
 

MegaXZero

One Winged Slayer
Member
Jun 21, 2018
5,079
It's a subsidiary company of the same company people are mad at, doing the thing people are mad at, being paid exclusively by the people they're mad at. This is pedantic at best.
No it's not. This is a big problem with these complaints, they have no understanding of who makes these damn games. Creatures is a completely separate company from Gamefreak.
 

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
53,606
If they have an entire company dedicated to doing this shit with anywhere between 22-40 full time staff, why do the animations still look like the lackluster animations from the 3ds games?
And that just happens sometimes. Delays in general result in large amounts of planning being scrapped or altered entirely. The Inazuma Eleven games were supposed to be made on pace with the anime and merchandise in their marketing strategy, but I sure as hell am glad they delayed the project rather than releasing a lesser work.

It's so silly that some people are willing to give GF any kind of excuse seemingly.
I imagine it's because the criticisms aren't very well articulated and seem to come from a completely ignorant stance about game development. Like the post above yours. While the same people simultaneously fall for the obvious grift that is youtuber gamer outrage.
 

--R

Being sued right now, please help me find a lawyer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,931
User Banned (3 Days): Inflammatory Accusation and Misrepresenting Other Users
Criticising mismanagement isn't throwing a tantrum. Some people have very clearly articulated their problem with GF and aren't being babies. So maybe don't tar all of us with your broad brush

Maybe if that people didn't harass Masuda, that has nothing to do with it, to the point of making fake sexual harassment and rape accusations, we wouldn't be having this conversation. It's so easy to say stuff about the people making the games when the closest they've been to a game developer is going to their Twitter to insult them.

But no, let's just keep watching people that know shit about the situation. People that say they know what's going on with GF and that they want to kill their own franchise because they want to focus on mobile games. People that still think Game Freak on their own make the entire games when there are companies and companies helping them to do the game. Let's just circlejerk about how bad Game Freak is on stuff they don't even make, because it's the simple way to do it. Because being informed is way harder than going to a forum and writing the three magic words. "Game Freak bad".
 

Terraforce

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
18,939
No it's not. This is a big problem with these complaints, they have no understanding of who makes these damn games. Creatures is a completely separate company from Gamefreak.
Does that fundamentally change the argument? All that does is shift the blame from one entity to another by your logic, so that does mean this is just pedantic.

I imagine it's because the criticisms aren't very well articulated and seem to come from a completely ignorant stance about game development. Like the post above yours. While the same people simultaneously fall for the obvious grift that is youtuber gamer outrage.
This is what makes discussion with a lot of you people so futile. Stop acting like the dumb minority that throw death threats and use incoherent arguments are the majority of people complaining. Plenty of people have made compelling criticisms, and plenty of people know full well what game development entails. People are so quick to blame "gamer outrage" when most people, especially on a site like this are far more reasonable. Makes you guys look like you're fearful of a boogieman of some kind.

And I'm saying this as someone who doesn't care either way. Never have I collected every pokemon, nor do I intend to. And I forget I still sub to Pokebank I use it to little. But some of the defenses of gamefreak are just silly. Especially when so often they come across as strawman arguments.
 
Last edited:

ArcaneStar_

Member
Sep 14, 2018
547
And that just happens sometimes. Delays in general result in large amounts of planning being scrapped or altered entirely. The Inazuma Eleven games were supposed to be made on pace with the anime and merchandise in their marketing strategy, but I sure as hell am glad they delayed the project rather than releasing a lesser work.

And now Inazuma Eleven is dead, people dont care anymore and the game will sell like shit. I dont blame TPC for not wanting to kill its series by treating it like Level 5 treats inazuma and yokai watch
 

dude

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,707
Tel Aviv
So what is GameFreak doing? What highly detailed animations have they created, if they don't touch the Pokemon models themselves.
Making the rest of the animations of the game, as the Op says?? All character animations, UI animations and you know - Everything else that is moving in any way in the game.
 

McScroggz

The Fallen
Jan 11, 2018
5,976
I'm not sure that this changes anything about the discourse, unless the point of this is just to inform - in which case good job OP!
 

Serebii

Serebii.net Webmaster
Verified
Oct 24, 2017
13,173
Sorry I wasn't clear. I meant to imply that since we know they are reusing 3DS models, and we know there is a separate studio entirely made for updating the 3D models, where is the issue in bringing them over to SWSH then.

You'd think having a separate division exclusively made for this would make their job easier, thus making GF look worse for refusing to bring over everyone.
Have a read of this post from an actual developer, not a youtuber or random from the Internet
Things are not binary and dont extrapolate what I said and make it sound like I said something different. Updating your engine so it uses modern physics, modern shaders, better animation based solutions, different kind of lighting etc REQUIRES you to check every single old asset you are importing, thats unavoidable! Maybe the polycount needs to be changed, maybe the rigs are acting funky, maybe the textures dont work well with the new lights, maybe all new materials for every creature need to be made. Its a ton of fucking work that is oftentimes solved by just remaking the damn thing.

The biggest disconnect between fans and developers is that fans are always shocked when something DOESNT work. Developers are shocked when something DOES work because 99% of the time everything breaks at the slightest hitch. There is a VERY HIGH chance that your favorite most polished game is one minor bug away from crashing all the way to hell but you just don't know it. This happens all the way from prototyping to ship

And this from another but on Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/cgh8fy/long_post_warning_an_actual_technical_analysis_of/
The missing link: Game Engines
So far we've seen no evidence suggesting this remade model statement is remotely true, but I've been withholding some information from you guys.

A model is a representation of points and faces, and can be stored in an exchangeable form, for editing purposes. Yet they can also be stored in a more convenient read only form, for game engines.

And guess what? Pokémon XY, Pokémon Sun and Moon, Pokémon Let's Go Pikachu and Let's Go Eevee, and Pokémon Sword and Shield all use different game engines.

Pokémon XY's engine was shared with Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire, even sharing model and map compatibility between the two. The model format used for this engine is BCH, similar to A Link Between World's models, too.

Pokémon Sun and Moon scrapped the previous engine, instead focusing on a new one with file streaming, for example. The maps aren't a single mesh anymore, instead certain props get loaded up individually as your player approaches them, or get replaced with imposters the further you go. As for models? Game Freak opted for their own format, the gfmodel format. Supposedly this engine move was due to loading speed, Z-move animations and performance reasons.

Pokémon Let's Go Pikachu and Let's Go Eevee have a brand new engine.... well is it brand new? It's really a Frankenstein engine. It features code from the Nintendo SDK (used for BotW and Mario Kart 8), it features file formats from Lunchpack (Splatoon 2's engine) and it features Game Freak's own additions, along with Game Freak's new model format, gfbmdl, or Game Freak Binary Model. It actually doesn't share much with the previous gfmodel incarnation, believe it or not.

Could it be then that they're using a brand new engine again for Sword and Shield? It's very likely that Game Freak has went ahead and removed their Nintendo SDK and Lunchpack dependencies, and along with it, streamlined their gfbmdl format some more. Under this assumption, sure the models could've been remade.

tl;dr What remade models probably mean
Wow, we're finally here in the end. If you've read up to this point, you probably know what the difficulty in bringing all the Pokémon to the new games is.

But for those of you that skipped, worry not! I'll summarize it real quick:

Technology, Time and Money

The new aesthetic style, allowed to flourish thanks to the new technology, implies redoing textures all over again for the entire collection, meaning there's more time and money constraints added to the mix.

A new model format implies reconverting all of these models, skeletons, animations and more along with bug testing every single one of the model converters, loaders, new animations and whatnot. This might sound simple on paper, but I assure you it's not, a lot of complications might pop up unknowingly.

Here's an (hilarious) example of what happens when a new animation and model format is being debugged, from Sony and Marvel's Spider-Man https://youtu.be/KDhKyIZd3O8?t=2433 (40:33)

A new engine can screw up existing models, animation rigs etc.
 

Gold Arsene

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
30,757
Maybe if that people didn't harass Masuda, that has nothing to do with it, to the point of making fake sexual harassment and rape accusations, we wouldn't be having this conversation. It's so easy to say stuff about the people making the games when the closest they've been to a game developer is going to their Twitter to insult them.

But no, let's just keep watching people that know shit about the situation. People that say they know what's going on with GF and that they want to kill their own franchise because they want to focus on mobile games. People that still think Game Freak on their own make the entire games when there are companies and companies helping them to do the game. Let's just circlejerk about how bad Game Freak is on stuff they don't even make, because it's the simple way to do it. Because being informed is way harder than going to a forum and writing the three magic words. "Game Freak bad".
You're doing it again.

Do you think everyone who has issues with GF agree with the Masuda harassment or the libel bullshit?
 

Serebii

Serebii.net Webmaster
Verified
Oct 24, 2017
13,173
Maybe if that people didn't harass Masuda, that has nothing to do with it, to the point of making fake sexual harassment and rape accusations, we wouldn't be having this conversation. It's so easy to say stuff about the people making the games when the closest they've been to a game developer is going to their Twitter to insult them.

But no, let's just keep watching people that know shit about the situation. People that say they know what's going on with GF and that they want to kill their own franchise because they want to focus on mobile games. People that still think Game Freak on their own make the entire games when there are companies and companies helping them to do the game. Let's just circlejerk about how bad Game Freak is on stuff they don't even make, because it's the simple way to do it. Because being informed is way harder than going to a forum and writing the three magic words. "Game Freak bad".
The Youtubers that have been harping on about this are the absolute worst.

One tried to discredit a professional translation I provided using Google Translate and people bought it because he is a youtuber
 

Gold Arsene

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
30,757
And now Inazuma Eleven is dead, people dont care anymore and the game will sell like shit. I dont blame TPC for not wanting to kill its series by treating it like Level 5 treats inazuma and yokai watch
Oh my god seriously?

Do you think pokemon is in such a fragile position that a delay would kill the whole series?

Last time I checked Dragon Ball was alive till Super and the Zelda manages to take it's sweet time just perfectly.
 

Clefargle

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,156
Limburg
Maybe if that people didn't harass Masuda, that has nothing to do with it, to the point of making fake sexual harassment and rape accusations, we wouldn't be having this conversation. It's so easy to say stuff about the people making the games when the closest they've been to a game developer is going to their Twitter to insult them.

But no, let's just keep watching people that know shit about the situation. People that say they know what's going on with GF and that they want to kill their own franchise because they want to focus on mobile games. People that still think Game Freak on their own make the entire games when there are companies and companies helping them to do the game. Let's just circlejerk about how bad Game Freak is on stuff they don't even make, because it's the simple way to do it. Because being informed is way harder than going to a forum and writing the three magic words. "Game Freak bad".

All of my criticisms of Gamefreak have been longer than three words and while I can't speak for Twitter, plenty of people on here including myself have kept our criticism civil. I denounce anyone attacking Masuda or anyone else at Nintendo/ GF /TPC/or Creatures.
 

Serebii

Serebii.net Webmaster
Verified
Oct 24, 2017
13,173
All of my criticisms of Gamefreak have been longer than three words and while I can't speak for Twitter, plenty of people on here including myself have kept our criticism civil. I denounce anyone attacking Masuda or anyone else at Nintendo/ GF /TPC/or Creatures.
Criticism is good. Criticism helps grow and I thank you for being one of the few civil about it.

Many people, maybe not the majority but certainly the vocal, have not been civil.
 

MegaXZero

One Winged Slayer
Member
Jun 21, 2018
5,079
Does that fundamentally change the argument? All that does is shift the blame from one entity to another by your logic, so that does mean this is just pedantic.
You are just moving the goalposts for him. His point was that Creatures is a subsidiary of Gamefreak, so blaming Gamefreak was fine. This thread is meant to correct a part of the vast amount of ignorance about the development of these games. It's clearly needed since he has zero understanding of what Creatures is. He even gives an example of Xbox and Microsoft.
 

Miller

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
1,243
Maybe if that people didn't harass Masuda, that has nothing to do with it, to the point of making fake sexual harassment and rape accusations, we wouldn't be having this conversation. It's so easy to say stuff about the people making the games when the closest they've been to a game developer is going to their Twitter to insult them.

But no, let's just keep watching people that know shit about the situation. People that say they know what's going on with GF and that they want to kill their own franchise because they want to focus on mobile games. People that still think Game Freak on their own make the entire games when there are companies and companies helping them to do the game. Let's just circlejerk about how bad Game Freak is on stuff they don't even make, because it's the simple way to do it. Because being informed is way harder than going to a forum and writing the three magic words. "Game Freak bad".

Here's some food for thought: Maybe don't bring up someone's false rape accusation every time their name is mentioned
 

ArcaneStar_

Member
Sep 14, 2018
547
Oh my god seriously?

Do you think pokemon is in such a fragile position that a delay would kill the whole series?

Last time I checked Dragon Ball was alive till Super and the Zelda manages to take it's sweet time just perfectly.

Nah, I agree that swsh should be delayed and 2019 should be a year off, Im just saying that Inazuma Eleven isnt the best exemple
 

Terraforce

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
18,939
And now Inazuma Eleven is dead, people dont care anymore and the game will sell like shit. I dont blame TPC for not wanting to kill its series by treating it like Level 5 treats inazuma and yokai watch
It's at least respectable for not shitting out whatever for the sake of yearly releases. Though what you say relies entirely on conjecture. Especially when the anime is still popular in Japan and growing in the west.

Plus, Pokemon would not take half of a fall as Inazuma Eleven if it released even a year from now later lmao
 

--R

Being sued right now, please help me find a lawyer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,931
You're doing it again.

Do you think everyone who has issues with GF agree with the Masuda harassment or the libel bullshit?

If y'all keep supporting the people that supports that stuff, yes. If y'all keep supporting these youtubers and personalities that spews lies because they just fit the narrative of "Game Freak bad", yes.

But I guess it's easier to think they're just lying about their own damn game because they want money. Way easier than to think "Hey, they got into problems with the game development and they just can't do it all" or "Hey, there's too much stuff to do apart from making models and maybe not putting all the Pokémon in the game is the only way to deliver a polished Pokémon game on time without overworking your employees to death like pretty much every company does". Or, you know, maybe Creatures Inc. ran into problems. Who knows? Way better than talking shit about them.

Here's some food for thought: Maybe don't bring up someone's false rape accusation every time their name is mentioned

Here's some food for thought: Maybe be mature and don't harass people over videogames.
 

Terraforce

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
18,939
You are just moving the goalposts for him. His point was that Creatures is a subsidiary of Gamefreak, so blaming Gamefreak was fine. This thread is meant to correct a part of the vast amount of ignorance about the development of these games. It's clearly needed since he has zero understanding of what Creatures is. He even gives an example of Xbox and Microsoft.
In terms of informing people, sure. But the argument does not fundamentally change whatsoever.
Here's some food for thought: Maybe be mature and don't harass people over videogames.
Do you have proof of literally ANYONE in this thread making that argument harassing people over this? I don't know how you don't see the fault in your position right now.
 

Miller

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
1,243
Here's some food for thought: Maybe be mature and don't harass people over videogames.

Well, shit. There goes my weekend.

It's at least respectable for not shitting out whatever for the sake of yearly releases. Though what you say relies entirely on conjecture. Especially when the anime is still popular in Japan and growing in the west.

Plus, Pokemon would not take half of a fall as Inazuma Eleven if it released even a year from now later lmao

The anime is not still popular in Japan. And "growing in the west" is a really gracious way of saying it went from having 0 viewers to 5. And I say this as one of the biggest fans of the franchise
 

HardRojo

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,242
Peru
Nobody because game development is hard and throwing tantrums and harassing people isn't the solution.
This kind of post is why I'm not gonna bother with mainline Pokémon in this forum anymore. It's clear that many of those defending GF are using the shameful and regrettable personal attacks and drama to generalize the entirety of complaints in order to disregard them. It's really exhausting because we can't complain anymore, so I'll leave it at that, you all win.
 

Clefargle

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,156
Limburg
Criticism is good. Criticism helps grow and I thank you for being one of the few civil about it.

Many people, maybe not the majority but certainly the vocal, have not been civil.

Thanks for being well spoken and sourcing all of your info as well. Even though we disagree, you've always done such a service for the community that I respect whatever you have to add
 

Terraforce

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
18,939
It kinda does, given the basis of the argument is completely wrong.
So it goes from blaming one entity to another. Now what? lol

I'm not saying they're right for blaming anyone to begin with because that I disagree with, but no the argument is still inherently the same.

The anime is not still popular in Japan. And "growing in the west" is a really gracious way of saying it went from having 0 viewers to 5. And I say this as one of the biggest fans of the franchise
Any argument against that is entirely based on conjecture. We don't know how Inazuma Eleven Ares will perform, and we don't know how SWSH would have performed if it were delayed. My point is simply that it is not unheard of, and that Pokemon is clearly a stronger brand than Inazuma Eleven to stand on its feet. Especially when Pokemon games have been delayed before. What you're arguing right now isn't the point I was trying to make.
 

--R

Being sued right now, please help me find a lawyer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,931
This kind of post is why I'm not gonna bother with mainline Pokémon in this forum anymore. It's clear that many of those defending GF are using the shameful and regrettable personal attacks and drama to generalize the entirety of complaints in order to disregard them. It's really exhausting because we can't complain anymore, so I'll leave it at that, you all win.

Mate, every Pokémon thread since E3 has been only talking about the models stuff independently of the original topic. Discussing the game itself has been impossible because there's people always saying the same stuff. You can't even talk about the region, or how the cities would be, or the order of the gyms without someone reminding you that you're a dumb fuck because you're buying the game. And you're saying "you can't complain anymore?". Lmao.
 

ShinyKyurem

Member
Jul 11, 2019
132
Maybe if that people didn't harass Masuda, that has nothing to do with it, to the point of making fake sexual harassment and rape accusations, we wouldn't be having this conversation. It's so easy to say stuff about the people making the games when the closest they've been to a game developer is going to their Twitter to insult them.

But no, let's just keep watching people that know shit about the situation. People that say they know what's going on with GF and that they want to kill their own franchise because they want to focus on mobile games. People that still think Game Freak on their own make the entire games when there are companies and companies helping them to do the game. Let's just circlejerk about how bad Game Freak is on stuff they don't even make, because it's the simple way to do it. Because being informed is way harder than going to a forum and writing the three magic words. "Game Freak bad".
That's generalization. Do you really think that most of us who complain about this decision are ok with that kind of behaviour? Harassing developers and making such terrible accusations is unacceptable but it doesn't represent the vast majority of this side at all, nor invalidates valid criticism.
 

Gold Arsene

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
30,757
If y'all keep supporting the people that supports that stuff, yes. If y'all keep supporting these youtubers and personalities that spews lies because they just fit the narrative of "Game Freak bad", yes.

But I guess it's easier to think they're just lying about their own damn game because they want money. Way easier than to think "Hey, they got into problems with the game development and they just can't do it all" or "Hey, there's too much stuff to do apart from making models and maybe not putting all the Pokémon in the game is the only way to deliver a polished Pokémon game on time without overworking your employees to death like pretty much every company does". Or, you know, maybe Creatures Inc. ran into problems. Who knows? Way better than talking shit about them.



Here's some food for thought: Maybe be mature and don't harass people over videogames.
I have watched exactly one video about this mess and it was Jwitzz who really wasn't that outraged.

I have no idea whee you're getting this "supporting youtubers" nonsense. I'm perfectly capable of being upset with Game Freak on my own thank you very much.

Companies lie. This isn't new. Maybe something went wrong and that's why the models look exactly like the 3DS ones despite being supposedly made from scratch. But if they don't TELL us those reason we only have their word vs what we see.

The only one trying to simplify anything here is you trying o claim anyone who has something bad to say about GF must be some outrage chasing youtuber and clearly agree with all the people doing shitty things despite the fact I've never seen one person in any of these threads condone the harrasment.
 

EvilChameleon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,793
Ohio
I don't think it would be the end of the world if the anime/cards/merch for the games came out a few months before the games. It's not like the anime is over in a month or even a year.
 

The Living Tribunal

Prophet of Truth
Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,206
If y'all keep supporting the people that supports that stuff, yes. If y'all keep supporting these youtubers and personalities that spews lies because they just fit the narrative of "Game Freak bad", yes.

But I guess it's easier to think they're just lying about their own damn game because they want money. Way easier than to think "Hey, they got into problems with the game development and they just can't do it all" or "Hey, there's too much stuff to do apart from making models and maybe not putting all the Pokémon in the game is the only way to deliver a polished Pokémon game on time without overworking your employees to death like pretty much every company does". Or, you know, maybe Creatures Inc. ran into problems. Who knows? Way better than talking shit about them.



Here's some food for thought: Maybe be mature and don't harass people over videogames.

You are not making any sense at all. I don't give a rat's ass about some incel making videos on Youtube, I have a right to voice my opinions on the direction one of my favorite series is taking and i have always done so in a civilized and constructive manner. Stop generalizing.
 
Last edited:

Pokemaniac

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,944
This really doesn't substantially change anything about the situation. If anything, the fact that they're already outsourcing the models makes them look worse for not stepping things up to finish all of them.
Main Pokémon games can't be delayed as it's a multimedia franchise and everything depends on them.
Of course they can be delayed. It's happened before in the past. If they were actually interesting in solving the issues, they had plenty of time to decide that the game wasn't going to be done for 2019 and push it back.

They can't delay the game now, because everything has already been set in motion for a 2019 release, but that's only because they already locked themselves in to the decision to ship an unfinished game months ago.
 

Serebii

Serebii.net Webmaster
Verified
Oct 24, 2017
13,173
So it goes from blaming one entity to another. Now what? lol

I'm not saying they're right for blaming anyone to begin with because that I disagree with, but no the argument is still inherently the same.
Blaming game development woes seems to be the logical course.

Imagine this scenario.

You have a game series, you've got 1016 Pokémon form models to bring over, each with over a dozen animations and you bring them over and over.

You're spearheading a new game and it's on a new engine, but disaster. When you port over the models, some parts work...say the wireframes, but the animation rigs break. You need to rebuild or rerig the animations for every single model, and test that every single animation works and if it doesn't, you'll have to rerecord it and rerig it. Think of the monumental amount of work. It's not something that you can do in 5 minutes, check off, do the next one.

It does come down to manpower, but that's a finite resource and can't necessarily magic into existence, as much as we may do the "hire more people" retort


I believe a situation like this may be what is responsible and why they had to "rebuild the models". I hope we can find some evidence of this soon after launch or they reveal the woes that led to this decision in depth in an interview. I'd have loved an Iwata's Asks for this
This really doesn't substantially change anything about the situation. If anything, the fact that they're already outsourcing the models makes them look worse for not stepping things up to finish all of them.
That doesn't make sense. That's not how it works.
 

HardRojo

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,242
Peru
Mate, every Pokémon thread since E3 has been only talking about the models stuff independently of the original topic. Discussing the game itself has been impossible because there's people always saying the same stuff. You can't even talk about the region, or how the cities would be, or the order of the gyms without someone reminding you that you're a dumb fuck because you're buying the game. And you're saying "you can't complain anymore?". Lmao.
Is that true, though? Maybe someone is overreacting by using generalizations in every post, and that someone ain't me. Anyway, as I said, I'm done with mainline pokémon discussion in this forum, some people are just too much, so you go enjoy wasting your time generalizing everything to try and disregard proper criticism, I've got plenty of games to enjoy and am actually away on vacations right now, no need to sour my vacations discussing this topic for the who knows what time now.
 

Terraforce

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
18,939
This kind of post is why I'm not gonna bother with mainline Pokémon in this forum anymore. It's clear that many of those defending GF are using the shameful and regrettable personal attacks and drama to generalize the entirety of complaints in order to disregard them. It's really exhausting because we can't complain anymore, so I'll leave it at that, you all win.
Basically. And when they get called out for it they just ignore it. Ironic that they're defending against criticisms while proving to be immune to logical critiques themselves. It's silly and just results in an endless loop of blaming the boogieman when plenty of people have made informed arguments.
 

Mory Dunz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
36,480
It's at least respectable for not shitting out whatever for the sake of yearly releases.
oh if they could, they would.

in fact they did. Layton, Yokai, Inazuma literally used to have 2 main games a year to get out all the sales they could at the peaks
One in July. One in December. Each year. not to mention spinoffs. Inazama one year released 3 games in a row in Nov. As in, 3 consecutive weeks. Yes.
lol, no wonder they're all dying/dead.
(I was randomly looking through level-5 the other day)
 

Sterok

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,087
I still don't get why the arguments are about the models and animations. If they just needed updating that would just be an issue for a few games till eventually everyone is good to go. They've made it pretty clear that it's a creative decision that they currently plan to hold to for future games.
 

MegaXZero

One Winged Slayer
Member
Jun 21, 2018
5,079
So it goes from blaming one entity to another. Now what? lol

I'm not saying they're right for blaming anyone to begin with because that I disagree with, but no the argument is still inherently the same.
You should probably reread his damn argument, since it's clear you have zero idea what it is. Actually screw it, let's not derail a thread that already has shaky rails.
 

Infcabbage

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,578
Portland, Oregon
I still don't get why the arguments are about the models and animations. If they just needed updating that would just be an issue for a few games till eventually everyone is good to go. They've made it pretty clear that it's a creative decision that they currently plan to hold to for future games.
Right, this is the part that really burns me. If they planned on patching in the rest of the pokemon in at a later date (like they did with Sun/Moon) I would be happy. But they just flat out don't want to do it, and aren't going to.
But where would these people come from?
It's not like they can't afford to hire more staff.
 

Gold Arsene

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
30,757
Right, this is the part that really burns me. If they planned on patching in the rest of the pokemon in at a later date (like they did with Sun/Moon) I would be happy. But they just flat out don't want to do it, and aren't going to.
This is the biggest reason I have trouble believing the "they must have had issues with the models" reasoning.

If that was the case why would they more or less say "we're never making a game with all pokemon again?"

If it was a modeling issue why couldn't they just patch them in latter or in a future release?
 

AllChan7

Tries to be a positive role model
Member
Apr 30, 2019
3,670
So if I'm understanding this correctly, GF approves animations and 3D models but work on human NPCs and other animations in house. They also provide the 2D concepts for the Pokemon as well for Creatures Inc

I know they aren't just sitting on their asses doing nothing so I'm curious as to what their actual workload looks like. Rather than assume this makes them look worse. Ultimately cutting some Pokemon was eventually gonna happen. If people thought it wouldn't eventually occur, then Idk what to tell ya.
 

Serebii

Serebii.net Webmaster
Verified
Oct 24, 2017
13,173
It's not like they can't afford to hire more staff.
It's more me saying that to get the staff required, there would need to be a crapload of high level animators inexplicably without jobs so they could start immediately. You can't just suddenly have such a large influx. That's not how life or the industry works