thank you.I've gotten bits and pieces from various sources, but here is a nice breakdown someone did on Reddit back in April:
thank you.I've gotten bits and pieces from various sources, but here is a nice breakdown someone did on Reddit back in April:
You can send it to Nintendo since it's still within the 1 year warranty period.I can't believe my left Joycon started to drift today(about 7 months after purchase). This is frustrating, especially since I take care of my stuff as best as I can. Is there any way to fix it permanently?
There's a point where the concepts of "cheap parts" and "defective parts" converge. I think it's pretty clear that the Joycons are beyond that point.With that surprised it took this long, but what if it was just cheap parts and not a defect?
Perhaps we should give them the benefit of the doubt that QA would have found it difficult to catch this (although I feel that extended use testing should have been simple enough to arrange - design a machine to rotate 1000 sticks nonstop for 2 weeks, see how many still work).Design engineering is tough - it's not like Nintendo intentionally picked out a poor analog stick supplier, and the design defect is only noticeable after prolonged use (aka difficult to do QA).
But what about those that say contact cleaner fixed the issue? And those with launch Switches without an issue?There's a point where the concepts of "cheap parts" and "defective parts" converge. I think it's pretty clear that the Joycons are beyond that point.
They will definitely take action in late August and in September, when the new OG Switch hardware comes out, and when the Switch Lite is released. I'm sure all of the media's focus will be on the hardware when either one of them comes out.I have a feeling Nintendo will probably take action soon because once Pokemon comes out then there will be a sustained uproar that will really damage their reputation
Finally. I can't understand how Nintendo gets away with crap like this. I mean, you purchase a product for $350 and expect everything to work, because why wouldn't it? And it's not just one or two, but the majority of people got faulty joy-cons. How didn't they fix this before? I like to play their games but the company has been shit for many years now.
I wonder if nintendo will release an statement soon or stay silent until its evident there is no other way out, because if the design flaw is as described, all joycons sooner or later will start drifting, the more time goes on more joycons will present the flaw and more bad press will mount.
By locks do you mean the little buttons that release the JoyCons? Did you have to buy them as a set or can you just buy the joystick by itself - and where? I'd love to finally be able to use my Neon Yellow JoyCons properly, as much as I like having Grey/Neon Yellow (though my fucking Grey set is having issues as well)Not that i'm not totally in favour of this lawsuit, but it does also highlight why right to repair is so important. Cost me $20 to get new joysticks and locks for mine instead of being forced to buy new ones.
The need to do that is why this lawsuit is needed.
Why would anyone not be totally in favour of this lawsuit...?Not that i'm not totally in favour of this lawsuit, but it does also highlight why right to repair is so important. Cost me $20 to get new joysticks and locks for mine instead of being forced to buy new ones.
The need to do that is why this lawsuit is needed.
I'm more concerned about whether this issue will appear on the Lite - it so, you're basically screwed.This is how I feel the Switch Lite might win out in the long run if it doesn't have this issue.
Good luck though. I had an issue with my left joycon back in late 2017, but it wasn't drift - the Switch just wasn't recognizing the attached joycon D:
They're going to eventually find out that it didn't. The problem is that the Joycons sticks, internally, physically destroy the contact points that measure stick position. This is a gradual process and the first effects of it can be caused by small particles getting in the way of the metal prongs that you can see in the photos people are posting. Contact cleaner fixes this temporary effect of the issue, but the issue remains and will eventually become permanent.But what about those that say contact cleaner fixed the issue?
Any gradual process is going to effect <100% of people for a long time. I've got launch Joycons that work fine (or at least they did last time I tested them). There were people with launch Xbox 360s that worked fine for years. This is an issue where the effect rate isn't going to jump to 100%, it's going to tend towards it, for years, and during those years we are going to continuously see people saying things like "I though everyone was exaggerating the Joycon drift thing because mine worked fine for years but now they're broken I guess maybe it was all true".
My point is that at these failure rates, cheap parts are a design flaw. The Joycons are defective by design. If the design would have worked if the parts were more expensive, then the design shouldn't have included the cheap parts, and they're still defective by design.Just asking because is it defective, cheap parts, a design flaw?
The 4+ year old controller that came with my console still works perfectly fine, and the thing's even been thrown around on more than one occasion.The rubber on my ps4 thumbsticks have given me far more trouble than the joy con ever have...
Enough people that Nintendo needs to fix it ASAP.I wonder what the percentage rate of people that have this issue. there must be close to 100m joycons (if you include left and right). The chance of success could relate to the overall percentage.
I'd be shocked if nothing happens, they don't need this bad publicity as they are on a roll and don't want anything stifling their momentum.Nintendo wont admit to the problem as that would make they liable to fix them all (around 100m of them) and I think if it can't be proven in court that a larger than normal defect rate ( I can't remember the percentage rate deemed acceptable) I don't think anything will happen.
I'd be shocked if nothing happens, they don't need this bad publicity as they are on a roll and don't want anything stifling their momentum.
They won't fix them all but they'd be playing with fire if they don't for future ones.
I'd suggest looking at this the other way around. If there's a scenario where Nintendo are liable to fix 100m Joycons, then they've designed a faulty product and sold 100m of them and that's a goodwill time bomb. Trying to avoid that reality until forced into admitting it by legal actions isn't going to go well for them.Nintendo wont admit to the problem as that would make they liable to fix them all (around 100m of them) and I think if it can't be proven in court that a larger than normal defect rate ( I can't remember the percentage rate deemed acceptable) I don't think anything will happen.
I think the time to fix this was probably two years ago with a revision to the Joycons. From whatever time Nintendo knew that this was a problem they should have been making alterations, and if they decided to use new sticks on the Lite, they should already be using new sticks on new Joycons. It'd be weird for them to be aware of the issue but only fix it for the Lite. That being said, their entire (lack of) response so far has been weird, so I'm not ruling out them doing exactly what you say, even if it doesn't seem like a good course of action.I think we will know when we tear down a lite. If there is a time to fix it the lite would be it.
Ty. I have not read that part about breaking down the contact.They're going to eventually find out that it didn't. The problem is that the Joycons sticks, internally, physically destroy the contact points that measure stick position. This is a gradual process and the first effects of it can be caused by small particles getting in the way of the metal prongs that you can see in the photos people are posting. Contact cleaner fixes this temporary effect of the issue, but the issue remains and will eventually become permanent.
Any gradual process is going to effect <100% of people for a long time. I've got launch Joycons that work fine (or at least they did last time I tested them). There were people with launch Xbox 360s that worked fine for years. This is an issue where the effect rate isn't going to jump to 100%, it's going to tend towards it, for years, and during those years we are going to continuously see people saying things like "I though everyone was exaggerating the Joycon drift thing because mine worked fine for years but now they're broken I guess maybe it was all true".
My point is that at these failure rates, cheap parts are a design flaw. The Joycons are defective by design. If the design would have worked if the parts were more expensive, then the design shouldn't have included the cheap parts, and they're still defective by design.
The difference is Sony and Microsoft acknowledged their faulty products. Nintendo has had time to respond and has done nothing. Also, a billion dollar company doesnt need a defense force.I have 3 pairs of joy-con and none of them had issue since launch day.
and Nintendo isn't getting away with faulty design, it is just that it would take a period of time for the drifting to occur.
in addition
MS didn't get way with RROD but Sony surely get away with disc ejection issue and HD failure.
the thing is that these consoles do suffer from various issue and that's common.
The difference is Sony and Microsoft acknowledged their faulty products. Nintendo has had time to respond and has done nothing. Also, a billion dollar company doesnt need a defense force.
What? I mean Microsoft did for 360 RROD (and paid handsomely for it) but we never saw something similar from Sony for PS3 YLOD, PS2 DRE, PSP disc ejecting, overheating (unless you turned them sideways/upside down) PS1s and so on. Those all either got ignored, repeatedly denied or saw class action suits to finally bring a settlement and acknowledgement of some sort.The difference is Sony and Microsoft acknowledged their faulty products. Nintendo has had time to respond and has done nothing. Also, a billion dollar company doesnt need a defense force.
Same.I'm more concerned about whether this issue will appear on the Lite - it so, you're basically screwed.
Um, this is pretty simple. If the joy-cons are outside of warranty, they will not be repaired free of charge. Plaintiff didn't want to send them in 13 months after purchase precisely because they didn't want to pay the full repair fee.Good to see People here are delusional as always.
These Lawsuits always just feel like attempts at shakedowns instead of actually trying to help anybody.
By the time this gets resolved and most likely settled(as they often do) switch 2 will be out, with no actual effect being felt by people till then, the payout will most likely be a few dollars per member of the class at least(generalising a bit, since i dont remember the exact number, but less than 15% of members of a class in such lawsuits tend to even get any money) while the prosecuters get the lions share instead of the people allegedly being damaged.
Reading the actual complaint is also strange for several reasons.
They say the defendant(aka Nintendo) routinely refuse to fix the issue without charge ,but provide no actual examples of this happening, and even state the plaintif did send them in, and Nintendo did repair them free of charge.
And somehow, the complaint alleges the defendant knew about the defect even in QA testing, but did nothing about it(no proof again), but they also never disclosed said defect to consumers(which contradicts the first point, since if the defendant didnt disclose they know about it, how could you know they knew about i in QA testing).
The issues raised at court, including breach of implied warranty and another warranty act specific to the plaintifs state, dont really apply in my opinion, since the plaintif did did get his joycon fixed within the warranty period, so no warranty was breached.
In fact, the plaintif didnt even try to send in his other pair of joycons 13 months after purchase, so there was never even an opportinity for the defendant to refuse any implied warranty(which does not exist anyway, since the warranty for the defendants products are clearly stated to be 12 or 3 months), nor for any breach of warranty(aka, 100% of the times he sent his joycons in he did get them repaired, free of charge).
nintendo responds
In short, they won't do anything out of the norm, just contact support for help.
nintendo responds
In short, they won't do anything out of the norm, just contact support for help.