It's quite amazing how many people have never used Google.
It's quite amazing how many people have never used Google.
Sony and Nintendo are both down near double digits yet posted record sales and profits? I just don't get WallStreet investors.
Step 1: Denial
If you forecast too low and end up going over it, it looks just as bad because it makes your forecasting appear unreliable. Additionally, if you forecast low, it seems your expectation is low, and investors won't want to buy.I have to wonder what their strategy was when they set their forecast at 20 million. Even if they thought they would hit 20 million, what would have been the downside of being a little more conservative?
It's quite amazing how rude you are.
If you forecast too low and end up going over it, it looks just as bad because it makes your forecasting appear unreliable. Additionally, if you forecast low, it seems your expectation is low, and investors won't want to buy.
But then investors move on to other stocks promising higher return, and if you have a history of projecting conservative numbers that beat, it gets baked in anyway.
You're totally right. Whatever you do, you doing it wrong anyways ;)But then investors move on to other stocks promising higher return, and if you have a history of projecting conservative numbers that beat, it gets baked in anyway.
I don't know. I'm not a finance guy. I'm really just parroting what a colleague in MTX told me when I asked him why he doesn't just low-ball his forecasts.I get that, but would 17 or 18 million have been considered low? Or if they had shipped 20 million despite forecasting 17, would that really have been a worse look than the opposite? Besides, nothing prevented them from forecasting 17 million at first then upping their forecast later on if they saw more signs that they were gonna reach 20. It just seems like they set a target they knew was very high instead of just setting a high but realistic target. Maybe they were really that confident in Labo expanding the Switch's reach and severely underestimated every other game, because they're smashing their software forecast despite Labo landing with a thud.
Normal market reaction.
Stock holders don't always have a great deal of knowledge about a sector. They see a black and white target and that target hasnt been met. They dont always see the colour around that where Switch sales are actually still amazing regardless of that goal.
Wow, they crushed their revenue for the year, and it still went down. Talk about ridiculous
The (anti-)fan fiction from our favourite Bloomberg reporter has come up with a doozy of a headline this time: Nintendo Switch Starts to Sputter Less Than Two Years From Debut
Clickbait Title:Didn't Click;
It was so bad that...
NINTENDOOOMED
Why are some saying Sony shares are down? I'm seeing them as slightly up 0.59%, whilst Nintendo's are down 9.19%.
What does a company have to do to make their investors happy? consistently breaking records isn't enough?
Doesn't this just mean its a great time to invest in some nintendo stocks?
Even knowing nothing about the stock market, isn't there absolutely little to no chance you wouldn't make your money back in strides?
animal crossing, pokemon gen 8, detective pikachu film, universal theme park opening in 2020...
Sony and Nintendo are both down near double digits yet posted record sales and profits? I just don't get WallStreet investors.
Stock prices are heavily speculative. There's something called a Forward P/E ratio that basically says how much a stock is priced above it's actual earning capabilities. Companies like Tesla, Amazon, etc all trade a very high Forward P/E because investors believe they will continue to grow. Something like GE trades at a lower P/E because they aren't in a growth stage.
Nintendo is a bit of an odd-ball, they have been around a long time so they aren't really in a growth stage but they have such good IP that they could experience explosive growth at any moment like what happened with the Wii and the Switch. So Nintendo's P/E is around 30 which is way less than Amazon at 100 but more than someone like Nvidia at 20. So the stock price will move based not on how well they do in past quarters but how well they project they will do in the future.
Traders are simply backing off of their bet that Nintendo is in a growth stage as the explosiveness of the Switch is slowing down. The P/E is still large enough to account for amusement parks, mobile, etc. That's the only reason they are actually priced higher than their Wii U days. If they swing and miss on mobile or capitalizing on their IP through non-video game means the price will continue to drop in the foreseeable future.
I sold out of Nintendo about 6 months ago.
The Stock Market is just a tool of investment. Sadly there are tons of shitty people and speculators gaming the stock market's ruleset. It's not good or evil. It isn't your friend or enemy it is just a utility. The people who abuse the system and prey on the vulnerable and a government who allows it are the actual villains and that is why we need more oversight. It is always kind of vexing when people comment on a system they sound like they've never even waded into just because one of their favorite company's took a dip.
Tbf that's how it should be. No one wants to buy something that will nosedive in value the next day.
The problem is that Nintendo's is very volatile since a good chunk of their shareholders want them to focus almost exclusively on mobile, so no matter how well their console business is doing it's never enough for that particular group. Their stock value is too dependent on imaginary potential rather than what they excel at.
I mean, the way things are today, there is nothing from stopping anyone that wants to enter to the market to do so at zero cost and with the ability to buy fractional shares in some of these free apps, the notion that it's only for people with a lot of money is laughable.
6% of $1,000,000 is obviously way more than 6% of $100, but 6%(especially if there is any sort of compounding) of $100 is a hell of a lot more than 0% of $100.
So did Microsoft
Stock prices are heavily speculative. There's something called a Forward P/E ratio that basically says how much a stock is priced above it's actual earning capabilities. Companies like Tesla, Amazon, etc all trade a very high Forward P/E because investors believe they will continue to grow. Something like GE trades at a lower P/E because they aren't in a growth stage.
Nintendo is a bit of an odd-ball, they have been around a long time so they aren't really in a growth stage but they have such good IP that they could experience explosive growth at any moment like what happened with the Wii and the Switch. So Nintendo's P/E is around 30 which is way less than Amazon at 100 but more than someone like Nvidia at 20. So the stock price will move based not on how well they do in past quarters but how well they project they will do in the future.
The stock drop is about the lowered guidance, not the earnings. If you lower your guidance you are basically telling investors that you expect to grow less/make less in the following quarter.
Traders are simply backing off of their bet that Nintendo is in a growth stage as the explosiveness of the Switch is slowing down. The P/E is still large enough to account for amusement parks, mobile, etc. That's the only reason they are actually priced higher than their Wii U days. If they swing and miss on mobile or capitalizing on their IP through non-video game means the price will continue to drop in the foreseeable future.
I sold out of Nintendo about 6 months ago.
You have people that make edgy post that sound cool with no intelligence behind them...and then you have these posts. Millions of people buy and sell stocks every day, each with their own reasonings for doing so.
Certain shareholders had certain value in the hardware sales and new mobile software, and decided to remove the money from Nintendo to spend it on other stocks. That is all...no one is dumb or evil lol.
Keep in mind Sony's stock went down too but no one is making a thread about that.
I think the reaction in this case was more towards the briefing that took place the next day. Whilst Nintendo did revise its hardware forecast down, investors right now are more concerned where the next 20m will come from and whether Nintendo will be able to execute the strategy it outlined yesterday.
That being said, the price will probably bounce back up again once there is a clearer picture of next fiscal year.
Thanks for the info, ive always thought there has to be some kind of mechanism that they use to try to safely predict future growth/loss.
Seeing as you sold, you dont think the theme park would make that big of a splash?
Thank you for the detailed post. How relevant are Nintendo dividends for long-term investors?
I mean sure, but with Animal Crossing and Gen 8 Pokémon already announced I don't see how they are left wondering where the next 20m will come from lolI think the reaction in this case was more towards the briefing that took place the next day. Whilst Nintendo did revise its hardware forecast down, investors right now are more concerned where the next 20m will come from and whether Nintendo will be able to execute the strategy it outlined yesterday.
That being said, the price will probably bounce back up again once there is a clearer picture of next fiscal year.
A lot of Nintendo's shareholders have been demanding a mobile focus for close to a decade now. Before they announced mobile plans in 2015, they used to get requests to go mobile at every single investors meeting.You have people that make edgy post that sound cool with no intelligence behind them...and then you have these posts. Millions of people buy and sell stocks every day, each with their own reasonings for doing so.
Certain shareholders had certain value in the hardware sales and new mobile software, and decided to remove the money from Nintendo to spend it on other stocks. That is all...no one is dumb or evil lol.
I don't know. I'm not a finance guy. I'm really just parroting what a colleague in MTX told me when I asked him why he doesn't just low-ball his forecasts.