wow that's a silly post. you said xenoblade on switch is a port, when it's not. not sure what ff7r part 1 has to do with that.I mean in the same year as this excuse me for not jumping up and down at that comparison.
that makes no sense. which is it?The poster quoted me for calling Xenoblade a "port." It is. Remastered, sure, but a port nonetheless.
And right after this time in 08 is when the wii lineup started going down the drain.
yeah except for animal crossing, trials of mana, spongebob, pokemon DLC, no more heroes 3, bravely default 2, outer worlds, xenoblade remaster, smash DLC, and many of the already existing games.Switch owners really will have nothing to play post March....what a time to be alive.
Ona more serious note,
this reminds me of the threads with people worrying about the fall 3DS lineup a couple weeks before e3.
Its like people never learn.
Yikes.. I mean.. I don't even know where to start, so I won't bother.I mean in the same year as this excuse me for not jumping up and down at that comparison.
Yeah, this is a totally fair comparison.I mean in the same year as this excuse me for not jumping up and down at that comparison.
My guess is that COVID-19 disrupted their timelines a bit and maybe they're holding off on announcements until the development/manufacturing/supply chain logistics landscape is more clear.
At least it isn't 2018 all over again.
For prior Wii U owners, that was a dire year...
Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze again, Hyrule Warriors again, Captain Toad: Treasure Tracker again, Mario Tennis Aces, which didn't feel all that much different to Mario Tennis: Ultra Smash ... š¾
Then Pokemon: Let's Go Eevee + Pikachu came along and they weren't as good as they should have been, and Super Smash Bros. Ultimate is a better and more complete version of Super Smash Bros. on the Wii U.
Whatever we shall (eventually!) get from Nintendo this year will be indefinitely better than 2018.
Im not worried - my Switch backlog is massive as it is and 2020 will be another big year.yeah except for animal crossing, trials of mana, spongebob, pokemon DLC, no more heroes 3, bravely default 2, outer worlds, xenoblade remaster, smash DLC, and many of the already existing games.
how could that sarcasm possibly slip past youyeah except for animal crossing, trials of mana, spongebob, pokemon DLC, no more heroes 3, bravely default 2, outer worlds, xenoblade remaster, smash DLC, and many of the already existing games.
Where's the lack of chill in this post? It's someone asking a genuine question as to whether this situation has happened before, which is a completely valid discussion to have.Between this, the constant PS5 threads and that guy who thought FF15 would be the last mainline FF title, my god do people need some fucking chill.
I actually think we had this situation before in april 2016, although it's possible there were some 3DS dates known at the time. They had one game with a release date (Star Fox Zero, which was delayed from holiday 2015), and at the end of april of 2016 nintendo had no games with a confirmed releasedate (for wii U)
Their full list at the financial briefing was
* Star fox zero (released that april)
* Tokyo Mirage Sessions (which release in japan the year before)
* Mario & Sonic at the olympic games
* Paper Mario : color splash
* Legend of zelda (temp)
* Project Giant Robot (temp)
We all known Zelda became 2017 and Project Giant Robot never happened.
wow that's a silly post. you said xenoblade on switch is a port, when it's not. not sure what ff7r part 1 has to do with that.
Oh come on, they knew exactly what they were doing.Where's the lack of chill in this post? It's someone asking a genuine question as to whether this situation has happened before, which is a completely valid discussion to have.
No-one here is seriously on the Nintendoomed train or anything like that...
from a software perspective that isn't really what a port isXenoblade Chronicles is very much a Switch port. It is remastered, but it is a port. Do you think the two things are mutually exclusive?
Xenoblade Chronicles is very much a Switch port. It is remastered, but it is a port. Do you think the two things are mutually exclusive?
To be fair, it's stressful times for people now for different reasons and games are a main way of escape for a lot here.Between this, the constant PS5 threads and that guy who thought FF15 would be the last mainline FF title, my god do people need some fucking chill.
Between this, the constant PS5 threads and that guy who thought FF15 would be the last mainline FF title, my god do people need some fucking chill.
Maybe more impatience than chill? I don't know, it just comes across as concerned when I believe there's no real need to be.The OP is perfectly reasonable and level-headed. How do they need to chill?
You gota love this place. Nintendo lineup is a no show,people asking in good faith. the competition is showing a strong line up and upcoming consoles.
nintendo apologists " oh here we go again nintendoomed, reset the clock "or other asinine shit, because you know nintendo does nothing wrong!!!.
I mean, you're acting like there are some objective, universally-agreed-upon definitions between where ports and and remasters and remakes begin and end
some people would say that a remaster is not a port. just sayin'
I'll repeat, where's the lack of chill?
Wooow you mean the Switch is weaker than a PS pro?? Damn...I mean in the same year as this excuse me for not jumping up and down at that comparison.
I'm pretty sure a port gets an existing codebase to work on a new platform with changes to low-level code. If the Xenoblade remake is exactly the same with new assets, then it's a port. If it's been rewritten from the ground up, it's not.
It's impossible to tell what's sarcasm when people genuinely believe that
In the US, we're barely at a fraction of what other countries are experiencing with COVID-19 and already companies are limiting work functions across the board. College systems are even considering closures. I can't imagine how processes might be stalled in other more affected regions.Isn't like half of Japan shut down or telecommuting for work/school right now? Are y'all serious with this?
I'm pretty sure a port gets an existing codebase to work on a new platform with changes to low-level code. If the Xenoblade remake is exactly the same with new assets, then it's a port. If it's been rewritten from the ground up, it's not.
(I get the sinking feeling that I just joined your side of the argument)
Then why not say that to the guy who quoted me for calling the game a port? By your logic, if it's not agreed upon, then I have just as much right to call it that as someone else has to not call it that. By the way I don't agree with your logic, it is a port. You guys for some reason are taking offense to a port being called a port. Why is that?
I'm pretty sure a port gets an existing codebase to work on a new platform with changes to low-level code. If the Xenoblade remake is exactly the same with new assets, then it's a port. If it's been rewritten from the ground up, it's not.
(I get the sinking feeling that I just joined your side of the argument)
what was the point of the ff7 remake comparison tho? that's a ps1 game from 23 years ago, coming to a more powerful platform. of course the difference in visuals is going to be way bigger. what does that have to do a 10 year old wii game coming to switch?Welcome to the dark side, where its apparently evil to call ports ports. I had no idea this was offensive until this thread, I say we just do away with the word. Maybe call them "updates."
They kind of do have an immediate thing coming up with the investor meeting. If they have no lineup, their stock will plumet.
Probably because it's not a port.Whoa there, pardner. I don't know where you get off with the name calling, it's a shame you have to resort to calling people dumbass. Is there something going on in your life that has brought you to this?
I have no idea what you're trying to say here.
Then why not say that to the guy who quoted me for calling the game a port? By your logic, if it's not agreed upon, then I have just as much right to call it that as someone else has to not call it that. By the way I don't agree with your logic, it is a port. You guys for some reason are taking offense to a port being called a port. Why is that?