Content creators who have made negativity a part of their brand are really the crux of this issue. I get that there are those where tweets, videos, or whatever get made in the service of negativity and the creator isn't normally a negative person, that's sort of its own thing, but for the people who have made ... millions of dollars off of being professionally angry, I think it's a problem. It's not *their* problem. They can't fix it; they're selling something people want. The fact that people want it I think is closer to the core of the issue.
There are a lot of people that want to see businesses and the people in them suffer for a variety of reasons. In a way, tweets, videos, messaging from 'influencers' or otherwise powerful people, feels like a voice for other people who have been mad at a game or company, and never had a way to express that in a meaningful context. It's prettying up a gross feeling in 'consumer rights', or the voice of the people.
Still, would it be nice for people who are quite literally in the business of anger to take a moment and remind the world that they are just a character? That while they're spouting off angrily at how awful something is, most of the time they're actually just thinking about lunch? Yeah, I wouldn't mind that.
