the terrible thumbnails scare me away from all youtube critics
Lol yeah, I don't click on thumbnails that includes a stupid face on it.
the terrible thumbnails scare me away from all youtube critics
Shush you, no one voting no has ever posted in one of our review threads.Don't most people around here get their opinions from Metacritic scores? Not the text of any reviews. Just the aggregate score.
100% loll. Look at all these people lying in the polls. There is ZERO CHANCE you keep your head totally empty and opinionless until you try a game out for yourself. It's just not true. Many people will have already formed impressions and opinions without even seeing a single asset, let alone a trailer or a review even. The fact is if wider audience opinions didn't have any influence, you wouldn't even know about what there was to watch. Unless you make use of a random button on a subscription service.
I acknowledge that's not how the question is constructed. Maybe there's an argument for "I always try to give media a fair shake, no matter what people say about it." But like, nah. It's impossible. I think it's better to just understand and assume that we are always influenced (in a broad sense) by the opinions and structures around us and not see that as a negative or scary thing per se.
Hell, I always find it funny how even in many Era threads, the 1st page often has one tenor and tone and thrust, and then later pages are like.. "what were the people on the first page thinking??". Anything can develop its own culture - and what is that if not socialized internalization of other people's opinions?
A study in CAPology?
You've never read/watched a critique for a film, book or game etc and had it affect your opinion on it in anyway?"YouTuber" isn't in my personal lexicon. I really don't think anybody on YouTube has an opinion on something that I've played that would ever supplant my own.
It may have spread more due to that video but that criticism of their games isn't anything new as I've been complaining about it since GTA4 and so have many people. I remember Jeff Green and Shawn Elliot giving GTA 4 this exact criticism back in 2008 on GFW Radio podcast. GTA4 was the game where I started to notice how much the mission design in their games was basically "Simon Says" and if you decide to try something Simon(Rockstar) didn't say you would fail a mission. Unsurprisingly people noticed it more in Red Dead 2 as its even more blatant in that game than the previous Rockstar games.I'm not saying there's a connection, but everyone's Rockstar mission design criticisms sounds like that shit Nakey Jakey video.
Yes, especially the people that like to pretend they only form opinions based on their own experience.Where is the line drawn? Is someone you know personally posting that something is not worth your time valid enough?
"Have to experience it yourself or gtfo" is an expensive and petty ideal to which no one lives up.