Since I'm getting deluged with mentions (yay!) I'll take the time to rewrite what I was trying to say, since my message didn't land the way I intended.
All I was trying to highlight was that you often run with your own strategy you plan out well in advance, you don't just knee jerk react to competitors. That's on me for writing from my phone in public transit though, so I'll completely take the L on that since even on rereading my post has some flaws that I could have better corrected for.
this must be your first time going into a new gen.
It's not, not even close.
The more 'Flawed' product lol. Both of these machines are sounding great. This kinda thinking belongs to console warriors
I didn't mean flawed as in there's something wrong with the product, I mean flawed because every product has weaknesses and you always want to soften those weaknesses and play up your strengths. It was not making a judgement that the Xbox is weaker (I don't know if it is, nor do I care) but rather one of general strategy.
sure. Just 4 reasons Possible? nah
No, I mentioned that there is way more than 4, those were just the 4 I went with because I was trying to highlight some of the reasons, generally the most common ones (in my view) why you'd want to go first. It's not a rule and there are millions of exceptions, I will never deny that :)
What Sony did the with PS4 is also highly accurate to this situation, but even then they didn't do any "reacting" to the competition at the reveal, they reacted at E3 by rehighlighting points of strength. The most you can say they reacted was the whole used games video they did, but that was more a rake Microsoft stepped into, one I can't imagine either side doing this time.
So back to what the point of my original point of my post was supposed to be: Microsoft likely has their strategy laid out and has for awhile, and to me the reasons why they went at the Game Awards was the C I outlined: it made sense to go then to get people who don't pay attention to their brand to start paying attention. And if that was the intention, it worked fantastic.
There are many other reasons, yes, but I feel that the best boon for them was that, followed by getting to lay claim to some of the key marketing buzzwords that'll be used this gen.
None of my points aside from A were to be interpreted as negatives by the way, and even A wasn't really a giant negative. Like I said, every product has "flaws", it's not a bad thing, and companies always want to highlight strengths and play down weaknesses.
I honestly don't care which one ends up with more computational power, that doesn't factor into my purchase decision in the end.