I think the vagueness is intentional for all these insiders without actual names attached to themselves.
XBX's CPU isn't just a normal Jaguar, it's very customised, it's likely SX's custom Ryzen 2 (with say less L3 cache) is about 4x faster, people saying it should be 5-6x faster are not exactly wrong & that could provide evidence that Phil is also downplaying the SX's GPU, but there is details that change the math & it's not as simple as comparing PS4's Jaguar to PC's Ryzen 2.
Can't believe we have to wait until February at least for the birds and the bees talk.
Yes, he has been doing every interview so far detailing the tech behind the console since April.
He doesnt work in sony, but he is hired as the lead system architects for the ps4 and now the PS5 (and the vita i think)
I made another PS5 concept. This one seems better I think. Still has the V shape.
Option 1, 2, 3 or 4?
It always is.
Actually, insiders says they're both above 10, both were targeting above stadia, and that PS5 is stronger.
I've read the article but i don't see anything about it being a possible FPS. It's only talking about first person perspective. Perhaps you are using FPS to say first person perspective instead of first person shooter?
Based on information you know or just what you think may happen?
I don't think I understand.
Phil Spencer said:
Honestly it would be much better if we had separate threads for each console. Things were much better when we had.
After reading around a bit I'm actually with Digital Foundry and Alex on this: Microsoft hasn't given out an exact TF number, they've only said that it's "2X of Xbox One X" which you may interpret either as 6x2=12 TF or as "twice as fast in gaming".
They decided to sail to the undying lands with #Team2019.
I made a edit and that doesn't confirm anything and was also not what i meant. Goal, think, feelings and aiming are not statements.
Yeah okay, this is what i meant. Thank you!
I know, my post was specifically in regards to ND.
I think I always made it clear that I don't have any questionable "inside" stories to share but rather focus on what the team is going for. And exactly that received confirmation 3 days ago. Not more. Not less. What one makes out of that is not up to me. If someone doesn't see the value in that and wants instead focus on binary information only - that's fine as well, just move on then.
They have said 2x GPU power of a 1X. GPU computational power is of course measured in FLOPs. Phil is well aware of this, same as everyone here. Discussing relative performance instead of comp power is not what they are doing.
So what TF number are the pessimists throwing around now?
Essentially anything that can be tied back to a 5700XT because that is all that we have seen come to market.
It seems the safe/pessimistic prediction is now 10TF and the actual target is ~12TF.
Why is considering anything but the highest number in the rumor circulation pessimism now?
Some dude on instagram with 745k followers took my PS5 mockup renders and posted them with his name watermarked on it, no mention of my screenname..
Proof that it's mine just because I feel like i have to prove myself now.
Sorry just annoyed.
