-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Next-gen PS5 and next Xbox speculation launch thread |OT8| - The Dark Tower (See Staff Post)
- Thread starter Mecha Meister
- Start date
- Status
The impression is: CU number is 40 , with 4 disabled for yields, so 36 active CU.Final clock in the retail PS5 will probably be in 1.8-2.0 GHz range.
Nobody can "confirm" that except Sony when they release the specs.
Well I wish they made a video on Klee, Jason and other rumors pertaining to the PlayStation 5 as well. You know, for months on end thats all we had to go by. Also could DF maybe make a video about RDNA 1 and RDNA 2, and how that affects the Series X regarding RT. We do believe MS has HW RT, maybe it affects the PS5 as well of course, but I would love Richards input on how MS is getting Hardware RT from RDNA 1, when no 2019 RDNA 1 card has it.
Dark1x
Dictator
And others from DF, Please ask Richard to make a video on this.
Next-gen PS5 and next Xbox speculation launch thread |OT9| - Be ready for the CES 2020 disappointment
Can't imagine it'd be the X. More expensive vs the Pro, in a less popular line of consoles.
Well it's not that outrageous considering people believe in a secret Lockhart chip no one has found as well as MS secret "Argalus" no one has any idea about.
Because they still need to test BC .
Most of these test have to do with that .
If final hardware is not out how do you expect them to test BC.
We even know there still working on it.
Also when it comes to code names it depends on what you talking about .
We don't have the PS5 code name and the dev kit name is not any of those .
Those are suppose to be code name for the PS5 gpu or apu .
No I'm talking about the posts in the thread, not the video itself. It's like a time capsule of our thread from three days ago.
testing with certain specs as in Clock speeds, memory speeds, memory bandwidth, and memory type. Their goal is probably testing a couple different things, and seeing what they get for final results in teraflops from what tests would show in their capabilities.
Remember final production does not start until mid this year in terms of mass producing chips. So they more than likely are close to the final iteration. And it's possible when they made this deal they had more than one chip they were testing with. More than likely this was a type of yield/clock/cu test.
They may have a 40 cu chip with lower clocks giving them a 9-9.2tf final number which I believe is close to Sony's target. And falls in line with what Jason/Klee have been saying.
Having your final tf number at 12tf is irrelevant. As this is all GPU for the most part. I think right now they are weighing in on tests for power usage, heat with whatever heatsink patent they have.
did you see how we treated Tom Warren, Kleegamefan and even Matt who is an actual mod on this board?
unless we become tolerant of the views and opinions of other posters, this place is simply not suited for people who put themselves out there with leaks and other industry info.
Could be why Sony are going for the not very expensive route, if true.
it it really much smaller than this:
the lack of the need for space for a discrete gpu saves a lot of space. The biggest component in the SX will be the PSU.
you can run a 2080 ti and a 9900k in a case as small or smaller than above.
Um, no we will be at OT9 before end of week, maybe before New Year's Day.
Oh yeah its interesting to me that they are behind and the thread will inevitably reach the same conclusions that this one has.
Making a video and making sure it is right, takes time of course.
Anyone here think that some of the testing from June/July was specific for yield? Is it possible they have spinned since then, and have better yield for 40cu without needing to disable 6 cu's?
I mean in June we may already have OBR D0. But OBR B0 testing was leaked first.
Oh I wasn't complaining about the DF video. The DF video is good and informative. I just meant that the other thread is seeing this info for the first time it seems, so they are having a similar discussion that we already had.
...and you expect this 13TF PS5 to be cheaper than the Series X or the same price? The series X is being sold as a premium product with an assumed premium price. So Sony would have to match the price of a premium console or sell at a huge loss from day one.
I'm expecting $499 for both.
Sony will have a slightly faster GPU. MS a slightly faster CPU. Sony will have a faster SSD. Pretty much a wash overall.
I remember sony saying something to the effect that it would be more than the PS4.
And Cerny saying that it would still be a good value for all the hardware it has.
Even at $600 the PS5 and XSX would be sold out at Christmas. Mark my words.
People even pay >$1000 for TVs nowadays. Who spent so much money for a TV in the 1990s?
it it really much smaller than this:
the lack of the need for space for a discrete gpu saves a lot of space. The biggest component in the SX will be the PSU.
you can run a 2080 ti and a 9900k in a case as small or smaller than above.
It is about the same height/width but half the depth. So less than half the volume of the EVGA case. A typical spec 2080Ti+ OC 9900k system is ~300W too.
i think both are $499 consoles, but with the possible power delta of ~3 TF, sony may have to eat it to market at $399, something MS won't be able to do (and won't really need to because of lockhart). aint no way xsx is 599, especially if lockhart is at least a year away.
Exactly. In no way would I suggest an insider/media type join this site.
I don't think that leak has the final ps5 specs but the reaction(and condescending arrogance) is embarrassing
If this leak is not about final cu count then I think it would mean exactly what Rich said - that AMD made an apu and just tossed it in the bin.
How about using it to test BC until final hardware is ready .
We know they were still working on it up to this year and in the data you can see BC test .
Does AMD ever do that though? Especially as this one seems connected to Sony via code name
- Status