that looks soo good. assuming both consoles have rt, this is the kinda stuff I cant wait for it too become the norm.
Remember, games only access 4.5 GB of that 8 GB on PS4. Part of the reason Xbox One X had all that extra RAM was to allow Picture-in-Picture with TV....not so much for gaming.
I had read when PS4 was supposed to have 4 GB of GDDR5 only 0.5 GB would have been reserved for the OS. So, for games it would have been 3.5 GB instead of 4.5 GB. There would have been no ability to suspend games and quickly swap between e.g. Netflix and gaming.
Remember PS3 OS only reserved 48 MB of its 512 MB (in two 256 MB pools) and Xbox 360 OS only reserved 32 MB. So, 512 MB was plenty for a functional PS4 OS.
It was always a spin. There's no way they could say that they couldnt do what their competitor does.It's strange. Not so long ago Sony themselves asked "who wants to play old games?" And their legion on the old place agreed.
Now it seems like a big deal. Not knocking the feature, just curious as to the stance change.
Who wants to play old games ranks right up there with rumble is so last generation. It was spin, and now that they have BC for PS4 its important.It was always a spin. There's no way they could say that they couldnt do what their competitor does.
In fact, I was very impressed that Shu decided to fess up that the reason why changing your name on the PSN was very difficult, because their database system was shit.
Even now after they managed to do it came with its own bizzare caveats.
It's strange. Not so long ago Sony themselves asked "who wants to play old games?" And their legion on the old place agreed.
Now it seems like a big deal. Not knocking the feature, just curious as to the stance change.
For things to run the same on both imo would mean MS is building the best local experience it can do that people who would subscribe to their cloud service would get an equally next gen experience on their phone/tablet, would make the service more enticing.I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, and I bolded the part that was relevent. I was honestly surprised by this which is why I'm asking given the quote:
"I believe the spec target is more to align xCloud and console as a unified offering where games will run the same on both."
Someone else wrote after me that they read it the same way. Phil Spencer has said xCloud is about options and that games will always run better on local hardware. Your sentence "seems" to me to say MS is aligning their specs so things run the SAME on xCloud and Scarlett. If they run the same, then we are aligning to a lesser experience.
Nah, cross platform for the beginning of the gen is different. This will be such a good thing for both systems.Who wants to play old games ranks right up there with rumble is so last generation. It was spin, and now that they have BC for PS4 its important.
That's exactly the context it was offered, the actual spin came from people misrepresenting it for their own needs.That interview is still misinterpreted. The Sony representative (Ryan?) specifically talked about Gran Turismo series. It's pretty much the same as saying, who'd want to play PS1/2 versions of FIFA now, instead of the newer and improved sequels.
Who wants to play old games ranks right up there with rumble is so last generation. It was spin, and now that they have BC for PS4 its important.
Colt is unreliable.
ninja Gaiden black and ninja Gaiden 2 4k@60 thoIMO BC in itself isn't that important throughout the gen, but at the start, through the transition, well yeah it's massively important as it makes it easier to make the all important decisions. If xb1 had proper BC with 360 from day one, it'd have been a massive boost at an important time.
That's exactly the context it was offered, the actual spin came from people misrepresenting it for their own needs.
Like this.
It's important now because they have a massive active userbase, huge subscriber numbers, and they want to make the transition into another generation as easy as possible for every one of those people to stay with them. It's that simple.
Colt is very, very biased.
The thing is, virtually every single thing a representative of a company will say in an official capacity is "spin" in one way or another. It's literally their job to present their products in the best light possible. Even if it seems like they are being honest about failings, that is usually a calculated choice to make consumers feel like they are open and trustworthy.Who wants to play old games ranks right up there with rumble is so last generation. It was spin, and now that they have BC for PS4 its important.
IMO BC in itself isn't that important throughout the gen, but at the start, through the transition, well yeah it's massively important as it makes it easier to make the all important decisions. If xb1 had proper BC with 360 from day one, it'd have been a massive boost at an important time.
It's strange. Not so long ago Sony themselves asked "who wants to play old games?" And their legion on the old place agreed.
Now it seems like a big deal. Not knocking the feature, just curious as to the stance change.
The thing is, virtually every single thing a representative of a company will say in an official capacity is "spin" in one way or another. It's literally their job to present their products in the best light possible. Even if it seems like they are being honest about failings, that is usually a calculated choice to make consumers feel like they are open and trustworthy.
That's not intended as an insult to any company representatives. They are just doing their jobs, and ultimately we're all talking about toys here. But anything a company rep says should be treated with a critical eye.
Listened to 4 minutes of this bs.
I didn't see any choice but to duck out for a few days. That was not healthy. Glad to see Matt and Zhuge setting the record straight on a lot of things.
Oh of course. Just like anything, there are people and companies that are better and worse at "spinning."100% agree, but I'm sure you can agree that some spin feels worse than others and that there are cases where saying nothing at all is better than bad spin. MS saying "we have a console for people who cant be online, its called the 360" or Sony saying they are "looking out for the children" when not allowing cross play. It's all salesmanship, but it doesnt always have to feel dirty..... at least in my opinion.
edit for clarity
Yh, I think this all started due to someone saying something about either of these companies making engineering mistakes and used the OG XB1 and PS4pro as examples. And the person was saying something to the effect of hoping it doesn't happen again with the next gen consoles. I was just trying to point out that what most may refer to as engineering "mistakes" (XB1 using DDR3 or PS4pro not being higher than 4TF and loud) were not mistakes at all. And were actually a reflection of these companies doing the best with what they had ad to meet their targets so in effect people shouldn't worry about next-gen consoles to that effect.
Almost.
The part that is getting missed is the XBO was envisioned as a multimedia focused box with Kinect, and to execute on that vision it was decided up front that it needed 8 GB of RAM. The only way to have 8 GB of RAM at a reasonable price, it was thought, was to use DDR. So the rest of the system was designed around 8 GB of DDR3 RAM, and the ESRAM and fewer compute units was the result.
Sony on the other hand focused their attention on what they thought would be better for playing games, which is why they went with GDDR from the start. The lucky and unexpected drop in GDDR pricing let them then double the RAM they were going to include, but it was far too late for MS to make that kind of basic change to the system design.
So, yeah. The reason XBO was weaker than the PS4 does really come down to multimedia and Kinect.
You've been around here a LOT the past few days. Just waiting for someone to drop the right question?Oh of course. Just like anything, there are people and companies that are better and worse at "spinning."
It's just always good to keep in mind that these reps aren't your friends, and don't have your interests at heart.
When Phil said that he was referring to the current xCloud offering in testing, which is based on Xbox One S hardware. So of course a game is going to play locally better on an Xbox One X. Phil also said, very clearly, that "Project Scarlett and all of its power and all of its performance is the foundation of our future in console and the formation of our future in cloud." So, aligning the hardware in both the datacenter and what's under your TV means xCloud is about to get far more powerful. It now depends how long it takes Microsoft to move from Xbox One S hardware to Scarlett hardware in its datacenters, and that will probably depend on how fast Google moves with Stadia etc.I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, and I bolded the part that was relevent. I was honestly surprised by this which is why I'm asking given the quote:
"I believe the spec target is more to align xCloud and console as a unified offering where games will run the same on both."
Someone else wrote after me that they read it the same way. Phil Spencer has said xCloud is about options and that games will always run better on local hardware. Your sentence "seems" to me to say MS is aligning their specs so things run the SAME on xCloud and Scarlett. If they run the same, then we are aligning to a lesser experience.
"To secure the benchmark in console gaming, Microsoft has to take a 2 point approach, by getting the maximum power in an APU, semi-custom chipset, while targetting a marketable price of around $500. While Sony may be targetting first price, and then performance at around $400."
"... But with the expertise hive-collection of Microsoft's engineers, the Xbox Project Scarlett can go the extra mile and that's where the words 'most immerssive' come into play."
"Maybe on paper, the graphics engine looks more powerful in the PS5; but the Xbox Scarlett is faster, and better suited to handle better physics, AI, and visual upgrades that make a massive upgrade over pixelcounts."
"But it isn't likely that the PS5 has bigger or better specs, unless Sony plans to sell their next console at $500 as well."
Oh of course. Just like anything, there are people and companies that are better and worse at "spinning."
It's just always good to keep in mind that these reps aren't your friends, and don't have your interests at heart.
Was around during E3, and now on a staycation.You've been around here a LOT the past few days. Just waiting for someone to drop the right question?
Was around during E3, and now on a staycation.
I'll be slipping away soon enough.
Back to being the terror that flops in the night, I presume.Was around during E3, and now on a staycation.
I'll be slipping away soon enough.