-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Next-gen PS5 and next Xbox speculation launch thread |OT5| - It's in RDNA
- Thread starter Mecha Meister
- Start date
- Status
Yeah, that's what I was thinking. Think it would be for the best too.
Even if say, Anaconda's teraflops is less than PS5 I dont really think it means much. They could resolve the performance issue somewhere else, like the CPU.
No worries man. Just that if you see a leak just ask people in this thread. There are a lot here who know what they are talking about (not me obviously)
You weren't here. There were plenty of people around. There was no need to ask. No one refuted it. Thanks. Idk why you're acting like I just pulled these specs out of my ass. They've been discussed here for hours.
I will not return to this thread. I'll just wait for the specs tomorrow. ;)
Guess they were sleeping.
I'm going with 11.1tf, especially with Navi.
4+ teraflops for Lockhart sounds underwhelming, but it's a 299 machine that is targeting 1080p TV, has a MUCH better CPU (Jaguar wasn't even an upgrade on Xbox360's PowerVR CPU) and of course, Navi's CU improvements.
Wonder how to market would respond to a lower end scarlet at $100+ less than PS5 and a high end one something crazy like $200+ more. They could build a beast for the enthusiast crowd just for the sake of having the most powerful and then focus on the lower end unit for sales.
Whatever they do will be interesting to see how they approach a dual console launch and how that plays out in the market.
Whatever they do will be interesting to see how they approach a dual console launch and how that plays out in the market.
If it will have 12 core
Btw Seeing the other thread Tom Warren commenting those specs with just :
"Those are dev unit specs, which Microsoft always boosts CPU clock speed and storage requirements inside. Even the Scorpio dev kit had double the RAM of the retail unit."
Gave me a shackle haahh
I'm sure they will use some other keywords ...to recognize the differences or superiority from cerny interview
Btw Seeing the other thread Tom Warren commenting those specs with just :
"Those are dev unit specs, which Microsoft always boosts CPU clock speed and storage requirements inside. Even the Scorpio dev kit had double the RAM of the retail unit."
Gave me a shackle haahh
Last edited:
GGGOOODDD morni....wwwwaaaaaa?!?!?
What the hell have I just read? 1 or 2 individuals going with their heart rather than their head it seems...
What the hell have I just read? 1 or 2 individuals going with their heart rather than their head it seems...
Not at all. You know what's funny? You weren't here for the craze so now you're seeing stuff out of context. Wow who would have thought that the world goes on when you sleep.
Anyone going with avatar bets? I'll take one with my guess with Anaconda at below 11.5 tfps.
Need a better avatar than this crap MGS one anyway.
Need a better avatar than this crap MGS one anyway.
I didn't say it was below or above only commenting on the gap.
Yeah that's fine. I'm thinking it will be somewhere near both Stadia and Anaconda anyway
At this point I dont think the performance delta (pure GPU TF) will define the "most powerful next-gen console" when there could be other things in play. We've seen that the Xbox One had ESRAM but with a weird setup so it never lived up to it's hype from Microsoft. We have also seen the Xbox One X being significantly more powerful than the PS4 Pro yet there are no titles that have showcased that delta. Sony realizes this which is why I think this time around, they're willing to give a deficit while focussing more on other features and (even more) on their first party titles.
If Sony is smart they rebrand PS4 pro to ps5 light maybe even give it a bump. Launch for 299.
Sony first party titles will look better due to no Lockhart base to optimise for, im still choosing to believe this.
I absolutely agree with this. I would bank on it personally. I think a lot of people don't seem to get that if you release two next gen consoles with one of them being really low spec then companies will develop for that and just increase the resolution, framerate and a few small graphical effects for the higher end system much like they obviously are doing with the Pro and X whereas Sony will only be developing for next gen systems only.
I wont be surprised if that mandate is changed after a year though.
The first year make sense, having first party games being made for the Xbox One on the third year seems a little too much.
The first year make sense, having first party games being made for the Xbox One on the third year seems a little too much.
on the bright side the Scarlet users will enjoy high frame rates on all this titles
wait i am confused, do you know anything about the PS5's target specification?
They won't reference 1X - multiplier too low. They can say 8x Xbox performance sounds much better.
i looked over his previous posts, he mentioned that he has information about next generation games, and now he is saying that PS5's performance (not sure if by raw teraflop count or in real time performance) is closer to stadia than it is to the xbox anaconda? if its in real time performance, then it sounds like the power gap between the 2 is greater than i thought... (of course assuming he actually knows stuff like that)
Okay , sometimes it is be hard to keep up with this during this seasons lol.
High fidelity VR. Oops
I wonder what happened there - it was only a year out from launch so they should have had a solid idea what they'd do. I assume they were aiming for WMR compatibility which should have been achievable
You will never know, because those games will never come to lockhart.
A lot of people think Sony exclusives look better because of art style and ability, I'm sure sony's first party devs will continue to be strong in these areas, however on a technical level don't expect to be using graphic technologies superior to Xbox's first party.
So Xbox 1X has 10% GPU extra in the devkit. If that holds for the rumoured 14.3tf / 80CU devkit then we'd be looking at a 72cu 12.6tf consumer version?
For PS4/5 that doesn't help unless we have an indication what PS4/pro devkits we're and whether they had any GPU headroom to compare
If PS5 was slated to launch this year, but was delayed to 2020, then it makes sense for Anaconda to be powerful.
PS5 specs were probably locked-in for a while now.
Yes but probably not a lot, the base architecture would have been in place.
Switch 2 will be the strongest next gen console, don't ask me for verification.
That could be right. Brad Sams did say that MS targeting or going to tell consumers that scarlet will be 4x more powerful than Xbox one s. And anaconda will be 2x more powerful than Xbox one x.
Maybe we will really find out today.
If PS5 was delayed that would have been decide a fair while ago unless it early 2020.
I think 13tflop is unrealistic for both PS5 + scarlett, because of the 1.25x ppc improvement of Navi.
That + things like the improved SSD are going to make direct TF comparisons between both machines (and to PS4/xb1) not super meaningful. Of course we'll still have huge salty threads over .1TF
Arcturus exists, it's an AMD chip
That makes 13 Tflops. It's 10% of 13, not 10% of 14.3
TLOU
arcturus is not an architecture, its the name of a specific chip, that has already been confirmed.
Going to be interesting to see if they do .
Since you can work out the TF number rather easy with that .
Unless they say something like 4x plus and 2x plus which give them wiggle room.
- Status