If the theories are to be believed
Series S is 1080-2k gaming @ 60 frames
series X is 4K @ 60 frames with the opportunity to go 1080 or 2k@ 120 frames.
There could be a $200 value gap there.
Series X won't be lower than 499 though imo
If the theories are to be believed
That's not how it works though. MS can do this for first party games by planning ahead, but for 3rd party, there's no such magic.
I was agreeing with you while answering the other guy :)
That's not how it works though. MS can do this for first party games by planning ahead, but for 3rd party, there's no such magic.
(are we really rolling with SeX on this one? I'll admit, its an upgrade from Xbone lol)...
Well we know one thing for certain.I'm gonna be that guy here because i've been out of the loop for a few weeks...but where are we at with the rumors? and how confident are we in the current rumors?....
I know we had been on a PS5 > Series X (are we really rolling with SeX on this one? I'll admit, its an upgrade from Xbone lol)...then last I remember there were some rumblings of the X having a decently more powerful GPU, but nothing crazy...Then I think I saw maybe the X is slightly more powerful, but the PS5 might have some faster memory and faster SSD performance?...but now I'm seeing we've got people saying the PS5 also has "more flops?"
Shit me...never take breaks from era...
jeez, i bet you're fun to hang out with...
Well we know one thing for certain.
And that's that nobody here knows anything for certain.
Because it's not a race to the bottom. You could make the same argument for incremental downgrades until you're back at the power of the Pro and X.If there's no discernible difference between 10TF and 11TF and maybe even 10TF and 12TF then why would both console makers even aim for 12? Wouldn't it make sense to just go for 10TF and save some money? Hey, maybe those savings could trickle down to us customers.
Because it's not a race to the bottom. You could make the same argument for incremental downgrades until you're back at the power of the Pro and X.
I'm fine with Sex. Or Xbxsx or maybe just xsxI'm gonna be that guy here because i've been out of the loop for a few weeks...but where are we at with the rumors? and how confident are we in the current rumors?....
I know we had been on a PS5 > Series X (are we really rolling with SeX on this one? I'll admit, its an upgrade from Xbone lol)...then last I remember there were some rumblings of the X having a decently more powerful GPU, but nothing crazy...Then I think I saw maybe the X is slightly more powerful, but the PS5 might have some faster memory and faster SSD performance?...but now I'm seeing we've got people saying the PS5 also has "more flops?"
Shit me...never take breaks from era...
I enjoy reading your posts.
Just a quick question, how serious would you guys take leaks that would get out? So like where the leaked photo of the back of the XSX came out, or the Windows Central leaks, is it something that you would shrug your shoulders at, or would MS be like "Who the hell did that? Find their ass" lol
And were you keeping an eye out for leaks on places like Era or Pastebin etc?
The NDAs must be pretty hardcore, cos their hasn't been many leaks.
Without any kind of specifics, are controlled leaks a real thing in the game industry?Thanks!
Ah... people would get pretty frustrated. There absolutely would be someone trying to figure out what happened, and often times there would be repercussions of some sort. Most of the stories that I can recall, the actual way the leaks happened have so many twists-and-turns it's never quite as straightforward as it seems. Some really crazy stories that i could never share. But yeah generally they were taken pretty seriously.
It's funny because if I could get details on just about anything regarding the next-gen consoles, the story behind the back of the XSX photo would be the one question I could ask. I have not seen a takehome kit in person so I don't know if that was real or not - but it looked real to me and I'd love to hear the story. I have to believe someone got busted for that one if it was real.
NDA's are easier to keep then you would think for the people who actually have access to the information. Most of the time people just aren't interested in losing their job for a few minutes of internet fame.
Coughnetkrnlcough :)Without any kind of specifics, are controlled leaks a real thing in the game industry?
The whole sandwich approach is interesting. That is what the pricepoint people believe for that to happen. XBX at 500, PS5 400, Lockhart 300. The thing is that the cost to manufacture is not as great as the price difference in XBX and Lockhart. If XBX were to be believed to be selling at under cost, then the amount of money that you are giving away to sell Lockhart at $200 less would be HUGE. Percentage wise, looking like OG PS3.
Phison controller is PCI 3.0x4 controller. It just has limits on reads of 3.5 GB/s, and writes of 2.2 GB/sThat would need 4 more PCIe lanes on the chip.
Also just PCI 3.0 and not 4.0?
PCI 3.0x4 is fast enough, but wouldn't that conflict with the Phison controller leak?
Why does everyone assume this was controlled? I remember being in that thread back then watching everything unfold.
Maximum shenanigans timeline :
- Sony have is meeting and shows amazing tech demos and game teasers for first party games. Everyone is overjoyed
- Sony press release indicates 9.2TF. Everyone cries
- MS announces Xbox event. Everyone gets excited for 12TF goodness
- MS shows a lot of games that are cross gen. People are disappointed...
- ... but the games look great on x1x so we're happy again
- MS press release shows x1x is 9.4TF. Everything kicks off
- MS interview talks about how 9.4 is twice as powerful as x1x. we reach second stage of grief
Without any kind of specifics, are controlled leaks a real thing in the game industry?
Did he get caught? That's all I want to know lolI can't speak for "the game industry" but I can tell you that in my time at EA and at Xbox in Marketing, it never happened. It honestly makes no sense from a PR perspective, because any information you have would be much more valuable to use as an exclusive story with an outlet.
Maybe it happens at other companies, I can't say. But not on anything I've ever worked with.
And the real story with ntkrnl is quite unbelievable.
Albert Penello Could MS take a huge hit, let's pretend it's really a 12TF monster that's coming. Could MS afford to take the hit and sell the console at 399 anyways? And then make up the money on Gamepass and Live subscriptions? Or is that just way too big of a loss. Because that would be huge to come out at that price if at that power.
I can't speak for "the game industry" but I can tell you that in my time at EA and at Xbox in Marketing, it never happened. It honestly makes no sense from a PR perspective, because any information you have would be much more valuable to use as an exclusive story with an outlet.
Maybe it happens at other companies, I can't say. But not on anything I've ever worked with.
And the real story with ntkrnl is quite unbelievable.
Spill the beans! :DI can't speak for "the game industry" but I can tell you that in my time at EA and at Xbox in Marketing, it never happened. It honestly makes no sense from a PR perspective, because any information you have would be much more valuable to use as an exclusive story with an outlet.
Maybe it happens at other companies, I can't say. But not on anything I've ever worked with.
And the real story with ntkrnl is quite unbelievable.
How much they are trading for really doesn't mean anything, many of these companies end up splitting the shares. Without splitting the stock Apple would be trading for over $3000/share. Some believe that their stocks are more accessible at lower values so in turn they split them to keep the price low. This just means that if someone owned One $100 share and it gets split at 2:1 then they end up with 2 $50 shares.Eh that won't stop the armchair business analysts. MSFT is trading at 180 USD but Xbox is doomed every financial report
Literally every insider and leak: it's 12TF
Oh man, what a tease.
Tell Jason
Cboat was great. Too bad he made something up for his last truthfactI can't speak for "the game industry" but I can tell you that in my time at EA and at Xbox in Marketing, it never happened. It honestly makes no sense from a PR perspective, because any information you have would be much more valuable to use as an exclusive story with an outlet.
Maybe it happens at other companies, I can't say. But not on anything I've ever worked with.
And the real story with ntkrnl is quite unbelievable.
Yup hopefully it makes the eaten crow even sweeterLiterally every insider and leak: it's 12TF
Forum guy: so it's obviously 9.x TF
Oh man, what a tease.
Agreed on that then. But then why do you think the price of one piece of hardware tells us the price of a different one, made for a different market?First equivalent is implied to means what's available on PC NOT literally the saying the Xenos GPU is a retail GPU.
Neither of those cards was available at the time of the 360 launch. And the X1900 XT initially retailed for $550, not $250.Further we already covered BOTH the RSX and the Xenos GPUs a little while back. The Xenos was between a ATI 1800 and 1900XT the latter of which retailed at $250.
I'm curious what part of the whitepaper you think you're referring to. Where exactly does it say that Navi10 can't have more than 40CU? (Though this is tangential, I'd like to know what you're interpreting that way.)Navi10 GPUs can have up to 40 CU (5700XT, 5700XT 50th Anniversary) but more commonly have 36 (5700, 5600XT, 5700M, 5600M, W5700, PS5). AMD's RDNA whitepaper in the OP proves this, you simply cannot have more than 40CU on Navi10.
You're very confused. He's literally asking for Sony to be more competitive.
As others have mentioned, CUs in Navi architecture are much larger than CUs in GCN. In addition, there's more silicon used on caches and other support hardware. On the other hand, it's unlikely either platform will use the full-size Zen2 version. The Flute leak tells us PS5 is using a version with cutdown cache, right around 50mm^2. This and other sizing math is in my threadmarked post.I'm glad you brought up Radeon 7, it's manufactured with 7nm node and has 60 compute units, which makes a good comparison with rumoured SoC of XSX.
Radeon 7 is 331mm^2 in size, XSX's SoC is around 390~405mm^2, Zen 2 8 core chiplets are around 75mm^2, the numbers checks out
Here's the main studios, trying to generally match sizes.I think some of those are debatable. Idk I wasn't really thinking about support studios. In this case I'm kind of using the studio count to look at what games we might expect.
343i Naughty Dog/ICE
The Coalition Guerrilla Games
The Initiative Sony Santa Monica
Playground Polyphony Digital
Playground 2 Bend
Rare Japan Studio
Obsidian Insomniac Games
Turn 10 Sucker Punch
Ninja Theory Sony San Diego
inXile London Studio
Mojang
DoubleFine Media Molecule
Undead Labs
Compulsion PixelOpus
Typically non-console:
World's Edge ForwardWorks
Anything lower makes the idea less viable. Everything we've heard is that Lockhart (even in its more powerful possible incarnations) will be considerably lower-powered than XSX. And I think everyone agrees PS5 might end up lower-powered than XSX too, but not by nearly as much. So if there's only a $100 gap between the two Microsoft machines, here are the possible scenarios:
Why do some games hit 120fps or more on PC hardware? (This isn't a non sequitur.)
This is a false narrative too, you are comparing proportional segments of $1200 Billion company and $90 Billion company. Of course that even if PS and Xbox made exactly same amount of money to their companies xbox percentage to overall company would be significantly lower.When was Xbox even close to being an important business segment for MS survival or even a highly profitable one compared to their other segments?