There's also that Zhuge "what if PS5 reveal in Fortnite" tweet which points to February 5th (if you interpret Fortnite as 2 weeks). But he clarified it was a joke later. Unless....
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Next-gen PS5 and next Xbox speculation |OT10| - We aim to transition those from OT9 at a pace never seen before. [SEE THREADMARKS FOR CHANCE AT GLORY]
- Thread starter Mecha Meister
- Start date
- Status
Honestly the heavy trademark traffic tells me something is imminent.
Yah, that seems likely.
If it is on the 5, thar whould put the ps meeting on the 26, before that they have the fundraiser stream.
I think so too. And then the picture Shinobi posted looked like it was hinting towards something in February or March.
Okay, as I say, I'm not technical, but, Microsoft have made the chip bigger. We've seen it, it's huge.
I don't think it's a PS Meeting. I think that Greg Miller's prediction is coming true. SoP in February and then full conference blowout in May. And I think that February 5th is the reveal, not the announcement of the reveal. At this point I'll take either.
Fingers crossed for a 26th reveal event as that would be an amazing birthday present for me 😁
the Pro was limited by its cheap cooling system and $399 price tag. Xbox One X was a $499 console with better cooling and not only had 8 more CUs than the 580 but almost matched the clocks and the performance of the 580.
with at least one of two consoles targeting the $499 price tag, it makes no sense to compare it to the x700 gpus. they will add more CUs to whatever AMD puts out for their 5800xt card, and clock it slightly lower. the massive 405mm2 apu and the giant case pretty much confirms a 60+CU card with medium-high clocks. my guess is that the xsex gpu has 70 CUs, 6 disabled at 1.475 ghz to hit 12 tflops. the clocks are low enough so that they can always increase them at the end in case Sony ends up beating their target.
With ray tracing in GPUs, SSDs which are 50x faster and CPUs which are almost 7x faster, it's going to be one of the biggest leaps in generations. the 7x increase in raw tflops is pretty decent considering how we went from 35x to 8x when going from ps2 to ps3 to ps4. if it wasnt for ray tracing hardware, the jump might have been 8x.
I'd personally read pleading the Febth as a hint at something at some point in February, not necessarily the 5th.
Could it be this week? /s
Although, is it just me or is the PS twitter really baiting everyone lately?
Although, is it just me or is the PS twitter really baiting everyone lately?
People saying it's just a new apex legend's character in the comments.
Last edited:
Everyone is reading into it all. Their poor social media manager is just trying to do their job.
But the time frame is important. Ps360 was an almost decade long generation. After so long to have an 8x processing jump was underwhelming.
On another extreme imagine if you had a 8x jump after a single year. That would be insanely awesome.
The good news is that even if we consider the lower end of current expectations for ps5 and series x they will be both way better positioned to the high end market than ps4 and specially xbone were.
If you watch it 13 times it changes... which means PS5 is 13 TF.
Oh i thought it was the dude has 10 fingers, and the blade has 3 lines carved in. So 10+3.
thats my problem with it, either it is a $600+ Console With crazy high power draw or something else is going on. A $600+ console that far outstrips the PS5 in power, draws less than 300 watts, doesn't match any AMD gpu we've seen or announced, and isn't consistent which what we've seen heard rumor wise.
My issue with this is the power draw would be off the charts. A 70 cu card 1.5Ghz would be crazy power wise when their 40cu card is pulling like 235w.
Add in the cooling and everything else and you would need a generator to run this thing or at least on a separate breaker than your microwave.
One on a Wednesday huh. So there's some precedence there. I'm going with SoP PS5 reveal this Wednesday.
4 SOP x 4 = 16
PS5 SOP on Weds.
Subtract Tuesday and Monday (3)
16 - 3 = 13.
Boom.
I still think Senua's face is not CG if we are getting a beefy gpu and cpu.
In-Engine.
It's almost like they'd need a new type of enclosure not yet seen in home consoles.
AMD changed their naming structure for their GPU though. What allows you so far to say "it's their x700 gpus" when in term of power consumption, pricing and die size, it's on par with their x800 gpus ? Also the fact that as I told you before, 5700 XT was supposed to be RX 690 according to E3 slides.
There's also the fact that, RX 570, RX 580 and RX 590 are chips fairly close, despite what their naming convention might lead people to think.
Again, can't speak to the technical side, that's over my head, however, from what I've read on here, it seems like the larger size shouldn't add that much cost.
Also, I don't believe it outstrips the PS5. Every reliable insider we've heard from says that the PS5 and XSX are very close in power. I think we're looking at two ~12TF monsters.
They're honestly having a field day teasing people. I'd do the same, lol.
Features like what? I'm unaware of anything unique to One X.
Not correct. PS4, Pro, One S, and One X all have GPUs that aren't offered as AMD products. And Mr. Panello should only be used as a guide to high level process. By his own admission, he doesn't know the technical details.
This alone should be enough to invalidate your logic. Here's a case where GPU itself is 85%+ of the entire MSRP. A $499 XSX could have a 50CU chip by analogy, greater than 11TF even without clock advantage over 5700XT.
(Of course, that's a spurious conclusion, because MSRP is no guide to cost.)
Your scenario directly contradicts GitHub info. It directly contradicts "insider" claims that 12TF is an RDNA number. It directly contradicts reportage that 12TF is the current performance target. It directly contradicts recent reportage that 12 TF is being hit. It directly contradicts actual measurements of AMD products.
Basically, it takes account of almost no info we have, apart from a portion of the GitHub leak. (And pastebins, but come on.)
The PS4 Pro silicon isn't laid out or made fundamentally different than any other GPU. Cerny's remarks about a "butterfly" are an analogy for laypeople, not a description of a novel process. There's not a special way of doubling CUs that's particularly cheap but wasteful.
The GitHub PS5 has 36 active CUs, implying 40 on chip with some disabled for yield. You can enable them all without doing a redesign. It costs more, but at the 2.0 GHz leaked clock, it's 10.2 TF.
No that is wrong again. You need to take the same base for both.
If you talk about weaker instead of stronger it's 15% vs 29%
Original Xbox One is 29% weaker than Ps4
Ps4 is 40% stronger than Original Xbox One
So, 5700 -> 5600 and now probably 5500 level performance being mentioned here.
Heh, at the least, there is no way to be disappointed with expectations that low.
Heh, at the least, there is no way to be disappointed with expectations that low.
12TF rumor was quite old in fact and even just as the chip was revealed it started getting word again. tomwarren and windows central and others. Klee also acknowledged that.
So you really think its a coincidence that tweet went out by 11:41am?
And that the loop lasted exactly 5 seconds???
More or less yeah, but X1X has higher memory bandwidth (326 GB/s) than RX 580 (256 GB/s), even if some of it is shared by the X1X's CPU. So in memory-bound situations, X1X might have a slight advantage over a PC with RX 580.
Last edited:
- Status