To be honest I found it slightly disturbing.
Sony probably heard us the other day, discussing organizing a PS5 reveal ourselves and decided to quickly throw together a pre-emptive event of their own.WCCFTECH: Sony files PS5 Trademark Application in Europe
Not sure how it works with trademarks in general and europe specifically, WCCFTECH speculate that a reveal is imminent. Any hot takes on this?
I have been reading Era for years. I followed it and I know what was going on well before I registered. It not often new consoles come out, and the speculation is fun. The reveals are fun, and the meltdowns are even funnier.
Thought I might join in.
I have been reading Era for years. I followed it and I know what was going on well before I registered. It not often new consoles come out, and the speculation is fun. The reveals are fun, and the meltdowns are even funnier.
Thought I might join in.
Sony probably heard us the other day, discussing organizing a PS5 reveal ourselves and decided to quickly throw together a pre-emptive event of their own.
We'll be given a HQ version of the gameplay GIF from Godfall, mark my words.Just to give us a recap of the CES and the first GodFall reveal, announced in a State of play, no less.
that's probably from Epic's recent post about UE4's hair improvements
Red tech gaming has a new video where he mentions he has talked with his source in a big AAA 3rd party studio and the guy has told him ps5 and xsx are so close in power that it should be considered identical. Again falls in line with what jschreier has told us
It is not that much, it is the job of video editor. And I was talking about XB SX games...It's a lot to ask developers to do slices of gameplay, I think it's one of the reasons, besides the obvious one that Sony doesn't have a ton of PS4 games in development anymore, that Sony hasn't been going to as many shows as they did earlier in the gen.
Hair simulation is probably running on the GPU. CPU physics is more gameplay-related, things like destructible environments. Physics that are more "for show", things like sparks flying everywhere in the Godfall gameplay video, are running on the GPU. Hair is more of the latter type.That looks incredible. Hopefully a real upgrade in CPU power will look this kind of thing.
I'm not most creative either but there's such an abundance of talent at Ninja Theory I expect them to be Microsoft Studio's premier developer in the coming generation. They have the potential to position themselves right up against Sony's WWS, not in just creatively but also technologically. With such a small team they absolutely delivered with Hellbalde a couple of years ago.
Console racing sims are a special case. The bottom line is we expect Forza Motorsport and Gran Turismo to provide benchmarks of a platforms capabilities so there's a lot of pressure to deliver, not just for us but also the press. It's a baseline comparison that's made every generation. Luckily they usually so deliver in different ways but it means Forza Motorsport should be there day one with exclusive XBOX Series X features.
Agreed with Forza Horizon 5. The same core in a different shell would work. Forza Horizon 4 look incredible so a fully specc'd Forza Horizon 5 on XBOX One X would be jaw-dropping.
It is not that much, it is the job of video editor. And I was talking about XB SX games...
Than i totally misunderstood you and own you a apology. I am sorry for that.Actually, you brought up Klee, not me. I was just generally discussing insiders and why so many have gone quiet.
The line you quoted was referring to the fact that we are likely weeks away from knowing the exact specs of both consoles. So anyone showing up now and commenting is risking being confirmed wrong very soon after.
Playable demos ? It's been a long time we didn't saw playable demos on stage.Video editor? When you go to a show you have playable demos. It isn't just straight video recordings.
Eeyore is talking about creating a demo for shows. It takes time, planning and optimization to create a demo. He is talking about the game demo itself(the one that gets recorded) and you are talking about the recorded session of that game demo.Playable demos ? It's been a long time we didn't saw playable demos on stage.
What are you talking about !
I am talking about Gameplay trailer. You don't need a "demo" to do it.Eeyore is talking about creating a demo for shows. It takes time, planning and optimization to create a demo. He is talking about the game demo itself(the one that gets recorded) and you are talking about the recorded session of that game demo.
edit: Perhaps i'm totally wrong
Back to work.
Playable demos ? It's been a long time we didn't saw playable demos on stage.
What are you talking about !
But this is not what I am talking about so why do you change the subject ?I'm not talking about on stage. Perhaps you've never been to a show but there is playable demos that are made for industry people and the press to play. It isn't just a recorded trailer. It's a lot of effort for developers to make these which is what I was talking about.
I'm not talking about on stage. Perhaps you've never been to a show but there is playable demos that are made for industry people and the press to play. It isn't just a recorded trailer. It's a lot of effort for developers to make these which is what I was talking about.
3. The "new plan" is to launch at the end of 2020 on a RDNA2 SoC with similar performance to that of XSX.
Trademark applications need to have a publicly marketed product tied to them within 4 weeks of filing, otherwise the trademark expires and has to be re-applied for (second application for the same product costs a fee, so companies try to avoid that)
So its pretty sure to happen within the next 4 weeks
This is something that I've been thinking for a while. I'm not sure why people are so sure that Sony/MS need to give 3 weeks for press to get organised.
Apple give like 2 weeks and every media organisation will make sure they are there. If the press want to be able to cover an event, they they will absolutely find a way to be at it. They won't pass up an opportunity to miss out that part of the news cycle.
Is the part about having to show something even true?Is this the case regarding the patent just discovered?
Is this the case regarding the patent just discovered?
Is this the case regarding the patent just discovered?
Ps5 was patented in 2006 . Why did they patent again yesterday ?
Patent, Trademark, are not the same thing.Ps5 was patented in 2006 . Why did they patent again yesterday ?
No sure we have so little info to make a correct call I feel . But weird indeed
Eu team is overtaking 😂😜 . Let's see
Drifting u still confident in feb meeting ?
Man, I wish, fuck 3AM conferences.
Yep.
And I can't help think of Outcast :)
According to Klee, the move to 2020 was in 2017 because of BC problems. I'm not sure why they would test an old chip from 2017 in 2019. IMO, if PS5 has a different chip than Oberon, the change has happened in early 2019 and it probably caused mass hysteria in Sony's HQ and was freaking expensive.The most likely scenario for everything we've heard on PS5 till now is this:
1. Sony was originally planning to launch PS5 at the end of 2019, based on RDNA1, 36CU, Zen2, etc. This makes sense if you consider the timeline between PS4 and Pro.
2. This plan was "updated" once they've found out that MS will launch a year later on RDNA2 (+RT, +VRS, +perf/watt) and a much faster SoC. Likely happened some time in 2018.
3. The "new plan" is to launch at the end of 2020 on a RDNA2 SoC with similar performance to that of XSX.
Thus this Github leak is about the "old" PS5 h/w, not the new one. Such scenario also fits into the rumors of Navi being "late" and running "hot" - which made sense only if Sony was planning to use RDNA1 Navi in the end of 2019.
The discrepancy from insiders. The truth of the matter is that there isn't. There are just posters on here that are interpreting information however they want and are arriving at their own conclusions.Really interesting...because Red seems to be reliable or at least doesn't say outlandish stuff for clicks.
I'm at the point where I have no predictions. I think we have 2 plausible scenarios why there's so much discrepancy from insiders. 1) Sony scrapping plan A and 2) confusion between GCN and Navi Tflops. So there could be a difference or there could be none at all and I'd say that neither group of insiders were lying or intentionally reporting false info. It doesn't appear very straightforward.
That said, I still say even low end both machines are capable of a much larger jump when factoring all aspects of gaming than we had last gen. I'm done predicting. Just waiting for some actual news.
Which single insider has said that SeX is more/significantly more powerful than the PS5? Like who has actually come out and said, SeX is more powerful?