• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

What would you like the movie to be about?

  • Canonize Cooler dammit!

    Votes: 183 43.4%
  • Adapt the Moro manga arc!

    Votes: 61 14.5%
  • A battle for the multiverse!

    Votes: 43 10.2%
  • Adapt the Granolah manga arc!

    Votes: 24 5.7%
  • Canonize Super Android 17, no really

    Votes: 27 6.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 84 19.9%

  • Total voters
    422
Oct 25, 2017
7,412
I wonder if Broly is gonna be in this . They have been surprisingly conservative with this new version of him that seems just as popular. But besides that. Glad me have Dragon Ball to talk about
 

Biosnake

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,240
I hope they didn't announce this too early and we don't get pictures or a trailer anytime soon.
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
It doesn't really make financial sense for them to plow money in to a tv series.

They make the majority of their money from merchandise sales. By releasing a new Movie it increases toy sales which is all they want (same effect as a new tv show with much less money spent)

the manga and dragon ball heroes keep them ticking over in the mean time

The movie is for ticket sales more than it is for merchandise. And Dragon Ball anime is an absolute necessity in the Super era, its a matter of when its coming. They have had the downtime and the movie announcement shows the are ready and ramping things up just as they did when they intended to continue the story of DB (I think Battle of Gods was only testing the waters).

The difference now is that the manga will have two non-adapted arcs at the very least done by the time the film releases, and it is really hard to see them just releasing it and having it take place with Goku and Vegeta developed far further than they were in the Broly film that took place right after DBS went on hiatus.

That only will happen if Toriyama isn't in charge of the series anymore and whoever takes over is a GT fan. Toriyama couldn't even bother rewatching the Bardock special before writing Minus/Broly. There's no way he will write several arcs based on GT. There's also the issue of how Toriyama's involvement is always highly advertised (like how they brought up Broly originally being a Toriyama design even). GT's villains aren't Toriyama designs.

Dragon Ball is far too big for it to be up to Toriyama to decide what happens, especially since he won't be doing it forever. Logically there is just no way they are going to ignore things like SSJ4 Goku vs. Baby Vegeta when they enter that point in the continued timeline. If anything it is much easier on them to REWRITE GT arcs and do things differently/better executed.

GT's villains being reimagined and revamped is something they won't ignore. Especially since Omega Shenron and Baby Vegeta are considerably successful villains given the GT hate and Super #17 is a decent excuse to use the popular #17 on a bigger scale.
 

Kodama4

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,933
The movie is for ticket sales more than it is for merchandise. And Dragon Ball anime is an absolute necessity in the Super era, its a matter of when its coming. They have had the downtime and the movie announcement shows the are ready and ramping things up just as they did when they intended to continue the story of DB (I think Battle of Gods was only testing the waters).

The difference now is that the manga will have two non-adapted arcs at the very least done by the time the film releases, and it is really hard to see them just releasing it and having it take place with Goku and Vegeta developed far further than they were in the Broly film that took place right after DBS went on hiatus.

I can guarantee you they make far far more on merchandise sales then they will on ticket sales from the movie.

TV series is not a necessity for this franchise, the fact its still relevant to this day without a continuous tv series is testament to that. They spent far less of production on Dragon ball Heroes and achieve the same effect.

Just because the manga is 2 arcs ahead means absolutely nothing, when Super was airing it went far ahead of the manga without a care at all.

Dragon Ball is far too big for it to be up to Toriyama to decide what happens

They can do nothing with the franchise without his blessing or direct input.
 
Last edited:

Roliq

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Sep 23, 2018
6,181
Giving me the black star dragons arc again but add a super strict time limit or something. Then have the Z-warriors get to break out into teams to fight each of the dragons. Maybe then we will finally let Goten, Trunks, and Buu do something. :/
The worst about that arc was that 4 of the dragons were jobbers and for some reason only Goku and Pan were there
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
I can guarantee you they make far far more on merchandise sales then they will on ticket sales from the movie.

TV series is not a necessity for this franchise, the fact its still relevant to this day without a continuous tv series is testament to that. They spent far less of production on Dragon ball Heroes and achieve the same effect.

Just because the manga is 2 arcs ahead means absolutely nothing, when Super was airing it went far ahead of the manga without a care at all

If they are making a movie, it is primarily for ticket sales. Why do you think they are setting it up for 2022, when theater attendance is expected to be significantly better? They could have easily dumped in on VOD or a streaming service but they are hungry to make the money the last few films have gotten. Merchandise will always play a part but the movie scenario is very different, and historically it has meant a bigger initiative is on the way.

DBS made DB WAAAAAY more relevant than it had been since the dub ended of DBZ so they can only go so long before it has a material effect on the brand popularity and it goes back completely down to pre-Battle of Gods levels. So yeah, it is absolutely necessary it comes back and DBH can only buy so much time before DBS feels antiquated, hence why we are getting another movie squeezed in before the anime return.

And yes it means a lot because the fanbase has to be aware of whats going on. They were even afraid in Broly to touch Ultra Instinct because it had only been debuted to the Japanese audience. If Goku and Vegeta have any other notable changes it is going to feel disjointed trying to explain it and act as if the events between Broly and that film were insignificant.

They can do nothing with the franchise without his blessing or direct input.

But the original GT happened and was disastrous with his blessing lol. Is he really going to take a stand against incorporating story lines and characters the fanbase likes and that Toei makes money on these past 20 something years? Like it or not, GT is part of DB history and is still used in the franchise to this day.
 

NeonZ

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 28, 2017
9,372
But the original GT happened and was disastrous with his blessing lol. Is he really going to take a stand against incorporating story lines and characters the fanbase likes and that Toei makes money on these past 20 something years? Like it or not, GT is part of DB history and is still used in the franchise to this day.
The problem isn't just Toriyama. After GT, Toei itself doesn't want to go on without him. It's why Super only happened after Toriyama himself took the initiative of being involved in production again with Battle of Gods and Revival F. If one day they dump that fear and decide to go forward with non-Toriyama arcs, there's also the possibility the staff will want to do their own stories, rather than just remake an old anime.
Just look at Heroes. Bandai has no problems sponsoring entire episodes that are just commercials, and can't even be licensed for broadcast or anything else to recoup costs, and yet Toei didn't make it an actual tv series.
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
The problem isn't just Toriyama. After GT, Toei itself doesn't want to go on without him. It's why Super only happened after Toriyama himself took the initiative of being involved in production again with Battle of Gods and Revival F. If one day they dump that fear and decide to go forward with non-Toriyama arcs, there's also the possibility the staff will want to do their own stories, rather than just remake an old anime.
Just look at Heroes. Bandai has no problems sponsoring entire episodes that are just commercials, and can't even be licensed for broadcast or anything else to recoup costs, and yet Toei didn't make it an actual tv series.

Toei doesn't want to go on without him? Then why are they preparing for his inevitable exit? lol. Dragon Ball doesn't end with Toriyama, that much is clear. Sure they have used as much input as possible from him but they want the franchise to run as long as it possibly can. And if they were so against GT then they would have stopped using the designs, characters, etc. long ago but it is as used as ever. Clearly there is an attachment to those aspects of GT that they are unwilling to drop and the timeline will eventually have to align with those events if the series continues to run for years to come.

Its not like they are going to recreate GT in its exact form. They could have all new arcs that take place before and after the reimagined Baby arc, Super #17 could be an outcome from an original new villain, the Shadow Dragons could be completely altered leading to Omega Shenron, etc. But I just don't see Toei NOT revisiting and fixing the problematic areas of GT for the sake of building on their already popular GT material.
 
OP
OP
Fj0823

Fj0823

Legendary Duelist
Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,644
Costa Rica
Toei doesn't want to go on without him? Then why are they preparing for his inevitable exit? lol. Dragon Ball doesn't end with Toriyama, that much is clear. Sure they have used as much input as possible from him but they want the franchise to run as long as it possibly can. And if they were so against GT then they would have stopped using the designs, characters, etc. long ago but it is as used as ever. Clearly there is an attachment to those aspects of GT that they are unwilling to drop and the timeline will eventually have to align with those events if the series continues to run for years to come.

Its not like they are going to recreate GT in its exact form. They could have all new arcs that take place before and after the reimagined Baby arc, Super #17 could be an outcome from an original new villain, the Shadow Dragons could be completely altered leading to Omega Shenron, etc. But I just don't see Toei NOT revisiting and fixing the problematic areas of GT for the sake of building on their already popular GT material.

GT is explicitly non canon and there has been ZERO attempts to reconcile Super with it.

The games and merchandise use non canon material like the movies or filler characters, but that doesn't necessarily reflect on the story.

Crossover material like Heroes treats GT as an alternate universe, and downright states SS4 is weak sauce next to the Ultra Instinct.

The ideas might be adapted like how Granolah is basically Baby, but we're certainly not headed to a remake of GT
 

NeonZ

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 28, 2017
9,372
Toei doesn't want to go on without him? Then why are they preparing for his inevitable exit? lol. Dragon Ball doesn't end with Toriyama, that much is clear. Sure they have used as much input as possible from him but they want the franchise to run as long as it possibly can. And if they were so against GT then they would have stopped using the designs, characters, etc. long ago but it is as used as ever. Clearly there is an attachment to those aspects of GT that they are unwilling to drop and the timeline will eventually have to align with those events if the series continues to run for years to come.

Its not like they are going to recreate GT in its exact form. They could have all new arcs that take place before and after the reimagined Baby arc, Super #17 could be an outcome from an original new villain, the Shadow Dragons could be completely altered leading to Omega Shenron, etc. But I just don't see Toei NOT revisiting and fixing the problematic areas of GT for the sake of building on their already popular GT material.
There are various groups involved here. The GT push you see nowadays is from Bandai, not Toei. The Dragonball Room created to manage the brand is from Shueisha, not Toei. It's why I brought up the Heroes promo-anime. Bandai is outright paying Toei for episodes which can only be used as commercials, rather than just partially sponsoring a new tv series like they do with many other franchises, like PreCure or Digimon, which shows pretty clearly that Toei still isn't willing to do a new Dragonball tv series without Toriyama's name.
 
Oct 25, 2017
12,319
The problem isn't just Toriyama. After GT, Toei itself doesn't want to go on without him. It's why Super only happened after Toriyama himself took the initiative of being involved in production again with Battle of Gods and Revival F. If one day they dump that fear and decide to go forward with non-Toriyama arcs, there's also the possibility the staff will want to do their own stories, rather than just remake an old anime.
Just look at Heroes. Bandai has no problems sponsoring entire episodes that are just commercials, and can't even be licensed for broadcast or anything else to recoup costs, and yet Toei didn't make it an actual tv series.
They're clearly prepping Toyotaro for the job though.
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
GT is explicitly non canon and there has been ZERO attempts to reconcile Super with it.

The games and merchandise use non canon material like the movies or filler characters, but that doesn't necessarily reflect on the story.

Crossover material like Heroes treats GT as an alternate universe, and downright states SS4 is weak sauce next to the Ultra Instinct.

The ideas might be adapted like how Granolah is basically Baby, but we're certainly not headed to a remake of GT

But it doesn't work like that. Super is struggling to even give the appearance it cares about the End of Z but it can't be shackled by that brief moment in the series, even more so for aligning with GT. Things are changing and being altered but they are going to try their best to hit the World Tournament 28th despite how different it is going to potentially look.

Going forward things will reflect the changes in the continuity, the reverse would only be harmful and set their efforts back. If the series timeline will eventually hit those points, I see no reason trying to incorporate them in brand new form. Its more difficult for movie characters to be added this way, as it is many people hardly believe a Saiyan as powerful as Broly was just stranded on a planet lol.

But do you really think Goku and Pan aren't going to go across the galaxy looking for some set of Dragon Balls eventually? Or Baby Vegeta isn't ever going to canonically appear? Or the Dragon Ball usage isn't going to backfire with the Shadow Dragons? Even though they were poorly done, they seem too remarkable in the DB timeline to write-off as never happened.

And how exactly is Granolah the same as Baby other than by being a Tuffle?

There are various groups involved here. The GT push you see nowadays is from Bandai, not Toei. The Dragonball Room created to manage the brand is from Shueisha, not Toei. It's why I brought up the Heroes promo-anime. Bandai is outright paying Toei for episodes which can only be used as commercials, rather than just partially sponsoring a new tv series like they do with many other franchises, like PreCure or Digimon, which shows pretty clearly that Toei still isn't willing to do a new Dragonball tv series without Toriyama's name.

We are talking about businesses here. Dragon Ball is a hugely successful brand that is going to outlive it's creator and there is not going to be a day where they aren't prepared for it going without him. Its already in the making as we speak which works against the point you are trying to make.

GT can be pushed by one company versus another, but the exposure they continue to give it only continues its tight ties to the franchise. We are not talking about a spin-off here, we are talking about a DBZ sequel here that takes place AFTER everything experienced in DBS thus far. There is an expectation or understanding that these events still take place in the future.
 
OP
OP
Fj0823

Fj0823

Legendary Duelist
Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,644
Costa Rica
But it doesn't work like that. Super is struggling to even give the appearance it cares about the End of Z but it can't be shackled by that brief moment in the series, even more so for aligning with GT. Things are changing and being altered but they are going to try their best to hit the World Tournament 28th despite how different it is going to potentially look.

Going forward things will reflect the changes in the continuity, the reverse would only be harmful and set their efforts back. If the series timeline will eventually hit those points, I see no reason trying to incorporate them in brand new form. Its more difficult for movie characters to be added this way, as it is many people hardly believe a Saiyan as powerful as Broly was just stranded on a planet lol.

But do you really think Goku and Pan aren't going to go across the galaxy looking for some set of Dragon Balls eventually? Or Baby Vegeta isn't ever going to canonically appear? Or the Dragon Ball usage isn't going to backfire with the Shadow Dragons? Even though they were poorly done, they seem too remarkable in the DB timeline to write-off as never happened.

And how exactly is Granolah the same as Baby other than by being a Tuffle?

Granolah is the sole survivor of a Saiyan Massacre hellbent on getting revenge for his people. That's the main idea behind Baby, with a completely different execution.

That's about the same you can expect for other GT ideas.
 

TheZynster

Member
Oct 26, 2017
13,285
Let me guess….. trunks will Somehow get butchered even worse. The more this series goes the more future trunks gets changed.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,607
If they're going to do new versions of GT/movie ideas, I'd like them to take another crack at the "old villains escape from hell" story.
 

Doskoi Panda

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
14,942
Seriously I think the Moro arc would work far better as a DBS movie than as a new season
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
Granolah is the sole survivor of a Saiyan Massacre hellbent on getting revenge for his people. That's the main idea behind Baby, with a completely different execution.

That's about the same you can expect for other GT ideas.

But Baby is a parasite-spreading creation that is more of a Tuffle mutant experiment than a "Tuffle survivor". All that they have in common is that they want revenge against the Saiyans for the tragedy that befell the Tuffle race/planet. They are drastically different and can co-exist, unless Granolah's plan is to revive the Tuffle race through taking over Earth's population lol.
 

Bman94

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,545
I hope they don't adapt any of the manga arcs after Tournament of Power. I would want to see those expanded upon and fleshed out some more in the anime, and not a "cliff" notes version. This does really make me wonder, what's "cannon" going forward for Super? So Broly leads immediately after ToP, we would assume this movie leads after that. So would the manga arcs fit nicely into this or will there have to be some retconning to make this work in the future for the hopeful return of the anime? I really don't want them to re-do the movies into the anime either.
 

ArchedThunder

Uncle Beerus
Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,026
DBS Broly only got its first visual 3 months after its reveal, so I expect it to be around the same time frame.


With Broly they had already given December as the release month but only a year was given for this one which makes me think it's more than a year away. If it's a fall or December movie we might not see anything more until the end of this year.
I hope they don't adapt any of the manga arcs after Tournament of Power. I would want to see those expanded upon and fleshed out some more in the anime, and not a "cliff" notes version. This does really make me wonder, what's "cannon" going forward for Super? So Broly leads immediately after ToP, we would assume this movie leads after that. So would the manga arcs fit nicely into this or will there have to be some retconning to make this work in the future for the hopeful return of the anime? I really don't want them to re-do the movies into the anime either.
Well Toriyama was involved in the first manga original arc (he didn't do the outline but came up with some story stuff including a major thing) and did the outline for the current one, so I don't expect anything in this movie to conflict with the manga. I also don't expect heavy ties to the manga either, but we might get a small reference or something.
Moro is implied to take place immediately after Broly (but not directly stated so there is a bit of wiggle room I guess), so I kinda expect this movie to be i between Moro and Granolah or after Granolah. The story for the Granolah arc was worked on over a long period of time apparently , so Toriyama might have been writting this movie and working on the Granolah arc around the same time.
 
Last edited:

Geldboom

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,260
With Broly they had already given December as the release month but only a year was given for this one which makes me think it's more than a year away. If it's a fall or December movie we might not see anything more until the end of this year.

Interesting, should be fun to see how long it will take before we get news.

I just need 1 visual poster so I know how the character designs look like.
That's what I want to see the most.
 

Red Fire

Member
Oct 26, 2017
5,468
I dunno why, but I hated the style they did Broly in. Some parts were ok, but then you had stuff like this that just looked terrible https://youtu.be/1JDzekB863Q?t=222
And I still can't shake it: Broly felt like a budget production, especially for a theatrical anime release.
"Terrible" lol. I don't know what kind of lame troll this is but the Broly movie, especially the part in that link, is the pinnacle of anime in terms of visuals, artstyle and animation. Can't get better than that.
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
Interesting, should be fun to see how long it will take before we get news.

I just need 1 visual poster so I know how the character designs look like.
That's what I want to see the most.

I believe it is entirely dependent on how fast the theaters recover. The vague "2022" release sounds like its being cautious not to have to move the release date around several times like so many theatrical releases have been doing since last year
 

John Doe

Avenger
Jan 24, 2018
3,443
What are the chances that Toriyama rehashes another villain/villain concept?

Let's see:
Battle of Gods: Original
RoF: Frieza
U6 Tournament: New
Goku Black: Evil Goku and Trunks coming from the future again
ToP new:
Broly: Do I need to say?
Moro: King Piccolo clone
Granolah: Looks new so far
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
What are the chances that Toriyama rehashes another villain/villain concept?

Let's see:
Battle of Gods: Original
RoF: Frieza
U6 Tournament: New
Goku Black: Evil Goku and Trunks coming from the future again
ToP new:
Broly: Do I need to say?
Moro: King Piccolo clone
Granolah: Looks new so far

If it were up to the fans it would be Cooler so don't complain about their "rehashes" lol.
 

Sanka

Banned
Feb 17, 2019
5,778
There are various groups involved here. The GT push you see nowadays is from Bandai, not Toei. The Dragonball Room created to manage the brand is from Shueisha, not Toei. It's why I brought up the Heroes promo-anime. Bandai is outright paying Toei for episodes which can only be used as commercials, rather than just partially sponsoring a new tv series like they do with many other franchises, like PreCure or Digimon, which shows pretty clearly that Toei still isn't willing to do a new Dragonball tv series without Toriyama's name.
I don't even know if they could. As far as I know mangaka co-own their manga. But most of the licensing work is done through the publisher. Maybe it was different back then. But if a mangaka doesn't want his series to get an anime for example then it will not happen.
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
I'm confused. I thought they explicitly stated that GT was an alternate timeline?

GT as we have seen it would be very hard to align continuing from Super (whenever that ends), but it is so much further into the future of the series that it isn't relevant at this point anyways. They can choose to make whatever they want canon from it when they have to come across it. The same way Broly wasn't canon until they felt like making it that way for fan service.

Expect the same for SSJ4 and anything else popular from GT, its just how these popular franchises function lol
 

Sibersk Esto

Changed the hierarchy of thread titles
Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,491
But do you really think Goku and Pan aren't going to go across the galaxy looking for some set of Dragon Balls eventually? Or Baby Vegeta isn't ever going to canonically appear? Or the Dragon Ball usage isn't going to backfire with the Shadow Dragons? Even though they were poorly done, they seem too remarkable in the DB timeline to write-off as never happened.

Uh yeah, there's no obligation to do any of those plot points
 

Lord Vatek

Banned
Jan 18, 2018
21,507
While I do think that redoing GT would be neat, I don't even think Super is going to make it to the End of Z.
 

NeonZ

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 28, 2017
9,372
I don't even know if they could. As far as I know mangaka co-own their manga. But most of the licensing work is done through the publisher. Maybe it was different back then. But if a mangaka doesn't want his series to get an anime for example then it will not happen.
I don't think there's any indication Toriyama is outright opposing an anime without his involvement, it's just Toei doesn't want to do it.
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
Uh yeah, there's no obligation to do any of those plot points

As bad as GT is, we have been exposed to those events as part of the continuity to the point where they feel "remarkable" in the timeline. I even hate when Goku gets turned into a kid, but I see it as another plot point they are going to hit again for at least the length of a saga. It doesn't have to be 1:1, there is no way it can be anyway, but GT has had such a presence that I think they'll hit all the major notes at least briefly or in some way in that period of the franchise (like when the characters are older). That and much more, GT was rushed because it was a sinking ship.

The biggest one is the whole battle of SSJ4 Goku vs. Baby Vegeta, its like begging to be told in a much more developed and memorable arc in the "GT era" of the DB timeline. And the fans love the designs so thats enough to make them "official" in the canon
 

Sibersk Esto

Changed the hierarchy of thread titles
Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,491
As bad as GT is, we have been exposed to those events as part of the continuity to the point where they feel "remarkable" in the timeline. I even hate when Goku gets turned into a kid, but I see it as another plot point they are going to hit again for at least the length of a saga. It doesn't have to be 1:1, there is no way it can be anyway, but GT has had such a presence that I think they'll hit all the major notes at least briefly or in some way in that period of the franchise (like when the characters are older). That and much more, GT was rushed because it was a sinking ship.

The biggest one is the whole battle of SSJ4 Goku vs. Baby Vegeta, its like begging to be told in a much more developed and memorable arc in the "GT era" of the DB timeline. And the fans love the designs so thats enough to make them "official" in the canon

Modern Dragon Ball turning into a fix-fic for every marginally memorable but poorly executed idea in the franchise would be a real shame when Dragon Ball can literally do whatever it wants

GT was already about mashing together as many show and movie ideas together as they could so they could go "remember when?"
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
Modern Dragon Ball turning into a fix-fic for every marginally memorable but poorly executed idea in the franchise would be a real shame when Dragon Ball can literally do whatever it wants

GT was already about mashing together as many show and movie ideas together as they could so they could go "remember when?"

What is stopping it? The series has literally all the time in the world, Goten and Trunks have been ~7 years old for like the last 8 arcs. Its in a unique position where it can re-approach the few bullet points that make up the very short GT and implement them in proper way while doing everything else it wants to do.
 

Mewzard

Member
Feb 4, 2018
3,443
What is stopping it? The series has literally all the time in the world, Goten and Trunks have been ~7 years old for like the last 8 arcs. Its in a unique position where it can re-approach the few bullet points that make up the very short GT and implement them in proper way while doing everything else it wants to do.

Except they haven't been. They were 7 and 8 respectively when the Buu Saga was happening, the year 774. Pan was born in 779 and Bra was born in 780. So Trunks is somewhere between 13-14 and Goten is somewhere between 12-13.

A reminder that this was how Goku looked at around 15-16:

MV5BMjQxZDY3YzMtZDNjZC00ODhhLWJhZDUtMWY0ZGVkZmE4NWVjXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTM4NDgwNjI@._V1_.jpg


Saiyans age weird. They basically just sprout up into adults one day, then stay young looking for a super long time.
 

SilverX

Member
Jan 21, 2018
13,000
Except they haven't been. They were 7 and 8 respectively when the Buu Saga was happening, the year 774. Pan was born in 779 and Bra was born in 780. So Trunks is somewhere between 13-14 and Goten is somewhere between 12-13.

A reminder that this was how Goku looked at around 15-16:

MV5BMjQxZDY3YzMtZDNjZC00ODhhLWJhZDUtMWY0ZGVkZmE4NWVjXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTM4NDgwNjI@._V1_.jpg


Saiyans age weird. They basically just sprout up into adults one day, then stay young looking for a super long time.

Gohan actually grew throughout his childhood. Goten and Trunks are meant to be seen as the age they were when they were introduced, they don't want actual attention being brought to the fact that quite a years have gone by already
 

Birdie

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
26,289
Moro Arc has way too much stuff I want to see expanded to get cut down even more so though.

So I'm not sure what to do...besides something totally off the wall.
 

louisacommie

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,569
New Jersey
Except they haven't been. They were 7 and 8 respectively when the Buu Saga was happening, the year 774. Pan was born in 779 and Bra was born in 780. So Trunks is somewhere between 13-14 and Goten is somewhere between 12-13.

A reminder that this was how Goku looked at around 15-16:

MV5BMjQxZDY3YzMtZDNjZC00ODhhLWJhZDUtMWY0ZGVkZmE4NWVjXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTM4NDgwNjI@._V1_.jpg


Saiyans age weird. They basically just sprout up into adults one day, then stay young looking for a super long time.
Why do trunks and history of trunks

Which was refeenced in super

Age diffeent
 

Saiyaman

Member
Dec 19, 2017
1,856
Dragon Ball Super: Gohan

My boy is finally about to shine in ways everyone else can't imagine.

Honestly, I have no idea what's going in the manga, nor do I have any clue what the movie could be about. However, Broly was dope, so I'm excited to see a trailer for this. And then inevitably be mad that it's another Goku and Vegeta outing.