Eh. This is already bordering on the "the only good sexualization is no sexualization at all" argument and I just can't agree with that.If it can be achieve without the therefore needless facefull of boobs why going for it ?
So again doing it right until some mother fucker who just can't keep it in his pants for more than 20 fucking minutes barged in and dropped that into the game .
(and yes over here in my country at least she's been used in marketing material in game stores )
The point is simply that a whole fuckton of games out there pull this exact same trick of basing its marketing on unreasonably sexualized female characters and it's tiring to see for a lot of people. So the "But there's the Dark Souls alternative" point doesn't really matter, the issue is that enough games do this to make it a pattern.What point am I missing if the very games that this game is based on offer what you're looking for?
Agreed 100%. Having like one character designed to be sexually appealing is far from a problem IMO, especially when it's not really unreasonable in context, and she's in one scene anyway, and there's more to her than meets the eye, which justifies her design in a few ways.Eh. This is already bordering on the "the only good sexualization is no sexualization at all" argument and I just can't agree with that.
Gwynevere's design makes sense in-game and most people will only see her once. She's not making sexual noises or posing suggestively either. What's wrong with one design that shows a little cleavage in a game that gets so much right? It's eyerolling, at the very most.
Again no I'm not in favor of the zero sexualization policy . I'm against it popping up at random for no rime or reason "just because"Eh. This is already bordering on the "the only good sexualization is no sexualization at all" argument and I just can't agree with that.
Gwynevere's design makes sense in-game and most people will only see her once. She's not making sexual noises or posing suggestively either. What's wrong with one design that shows a little cleavage in a game that gets so much right? It's eyerolling, at the very most.
Fun fact: Miyazaki himself thought the design was a bit much, but since the designer was so happy with it "he just couldn't tell him no."
Please don't remind all of us that video game adaptation rights of Berserk still are in the hands of Koei ...Give me a Beserk game that plays like Dark Souls, then we'll talk.
it would help to show more of the combat. as I said before, souls-like live and die on their combat. an indepth combat video would go a long way in making the product more appealingAll this is useful feedback! Thanks so much for sharing regardless whether it's positive or negative, it's all good feedback.
Because its extremely effective for the kind of people your accusing the designer as being. The souls universe is about as unerotic as it gets and to then be confronted by some cleavage clearly resonated with people. If it was purely the devs being horny. Then don't you think there would be more designs like hers? I can't think of any others, not just in Dark Souls, but all From Soft games(that I've played).If it can be achieved without the therefore needless facefull of boobs why going for it ?
So again doing it right, until some mother fucker who just can't keep it in his pants for more than 20 fucking minutes barged in and dropped that into the game .
(and yes over here in my country at least she's been used in marketing material in game stores )
And to Gbraga bosses are a different analytical bag but gratuitous boobs is gratuitous boobs and needless , nontheless so although yes the repercussions are different on the overarching piece , doesn't change the fact that it is tiresome to be greeted once again by a needless facefull of boobs . So Queelag is also eggregious and unnecessary.
Again no I'm not in favor of the zero sexualization policy . I'm against it popping up at random for no rime or reason "just because"
And sorry but Gwynevere is one such example of popping at random for no rime or reason at all. It was needless senseless baseless and could have been done without and IS better off without.
You won't see me complaining about the sexualization of some fighting game characters while complaining about the sexualization of others, in Dark Souls both Gwyn and Queelag are just straight up gratuitous and unnecessary period.
And yet another one on the pile of trying to discredit me just because he wants some boobs in his low magic , end of the world dark fantasy . Because Conan is better than the Cycle of Eiween yall ...Were you following the lore up that point or just killing bosses?
Dude I'm gonna answer you by quoting someone in that very thread ...Because its extremely effective for the kind of people your accusing the designer as being. The souls universe is about as unerotic as it gets and to then be confronted by some cleavage clearly resonated with people. If it was purely the devs being horny. Then don't you think there would be more designs like hers? I can't think of any others, not just in Dark Souls, but all From Soft games(that I've played).
I mean what more do you fucking want than Miyazaki himself legit admitting that he accepted under peer pressure of the designer that created it ...Fun fact: Miyazaki himself thought the design was a bit much, but since the designer was so happy with it "he just couldn't tell him no."
I don't care about gwynevere being in the game because it was just a stop for me, but you're objectively wrong about there not being any context leading up to and after her appearance that could explain her appearance, especially when you learn that what you're seeing isn't even real.And yet another one on the pile of trying to discredit me just because he wants some boobs in his low magic , end of the world dark fantasy . Because Conan is better than the Cycle of Eiween yall ...
Please do tell me just how that big facefull of cleavage was absolutely necessary and couldn't be in any way shape or form be skipped altogether ?
Dude I'm gonna answer you by quoting someone in that very thread ...
I mean what more do you fucking want than Miyazaki himself legit admitting that he accepted under peer pressure of the designer that created it ...
So again at the risk of repeating myself "Doing it right until some mother fucker who just can't keep it in his pants for more than 20 minutes barged in and threw that shit in"
And if anything said fetish ain't exactly a very inventive one but a very tropey and rapey one , complete with the Zettai ryōiki non sense...The thing that pushes it over the top from "kind of off-putting but whatever" to "I am looking at the developer's fetish" is that not only are all of the characters aggressively sexualized, but in seemingly the exact same way. A little variety would go a long way.
Same goes than with Quiet in MGS V , it's just a pretty pitifull copout that is an insult to the rest of the lore and of the canon at large .I don't care about gwynevere being in the game because it was just a stop for me, but you're objectively wrong about there not being any context leading up to and after her appearance that could explain her appearance, especially when you learn that what you're seeing isn't even real.
Once again Gwynevere didn't needed to look like she's straight up escaped a pre muslim era middle eastern fairy tale . Her face the sofa and everything in the environnement was enough of a striking moment of beauty in this looong pale foggy low magic dark fantasy road to hit a nerve. The facefull of naked cleavage was completly uncalled for ...It sounds like you're thinking that people just want tits and ass in Dark Souls and then throwing around the one blatant example of sexuality.
Gwynevere can't be compared with Quiet when they take up drastically different amounts of screen time and appear in the game under different circumstances. If she was Dark Souls Maiden equivalent then I'd agree it was gratuitous.Same goes than with Quiet in MGS V , it's just a pretty pitifull copout that is an insult to the rest of the lore and of the canon at large .
Again gratuitous and could have been done the same way , with roughly the same model just with much more modest clothing , and setup .
Wow, okay. I never said the cleavage was necessary, I said I didn't care because she's in one room in a game that is practically the furthest you can get from fan service. I personally didn't find it titillating because of how fucked up everything around the area is, but I can't speak for everyone.Once again Gwynevere didn't needed to look like she's straight up escaped a pre muslim era middle eastern fairy tale . Her face the sofa and everything in the environnement was enough of a striking moment of beauty in this looong pale foggy low magic dark fantasy road to hit a nerve. The facefull of naked cleavage was completly uncalled for ...
So once again if you want to insist that this facefull of boobs was absolutely necessary please do but at least try to come up with a somewhat sensical argument , rather than being a dismissive prick .
Sorry but that's so pathetic. Hahahaha.Now how about you drop that act or you do really want me to hit the report button ?
And yet you painted me as the prude who didn't play the game and just googled "dark souls tits" and started a rant just because he had some beef to solve with the game ...
I'm not saying it's inaccurate, I'm just saying I'm really, REALLY tired of every single game aping Dark Souls.
You seem to be putting words in my mouth since I never called you a prude. If you think that then that's telling. I was always talking about how Gwynevere didn't just pop up at random. If the context fits or is appropriate is debatable, but she has context in the game.And yet you painted me as the prude who didn't play the game and just googled "dark souls tits" and started a rant just because he had some beef to solve with the game ...
That one nasty part aside
So you do recognize that the facefull of naked cleavage was completly uncalled for. Therefore the blatant call back to the Sinovere Baladaquin fairy tale from pre islam Lebanon (and all of the erotic bagage that comes with calling back to it ) was unnecessary and the designers could have easily evoke the same sense of striking beauty in a bleak overall world without plain gratuituous titilation so what's so wrong about my statement again ?????
Again no I'm not in favor of the zero sexualization policy . I'm against it popping up at random for no rime or reason "just because"
And sorry but Gwynevere is one such example of popping at random for no rime or reason at all. It was needless senseless baseless and could have been done without and IS better off without.
She has context the facefull of naked cleavage doesn't have a context rime or reason to be here. Dude are you really that dense ? Or are you missing the fucking point on purpose ?I was always talking about how Gwynevere didn't just pop up at random. If the context fits or is appropriate is debatable, but she has context in the game.
Dude let me throw your own words back at youYou seem to be putting words in my mouth since I never called you a prude.
If that isn't calling me a prude I dunno what is mate ...It sounds like you're thinking that people just want tits and ass in Dark Souls and then throwing around the one blatant example of sexuality.
My entire point is that she's an illusion used to misguide the player. Whatever you see is up to the caster. If you don't like that then that's your choice, but it's the truth.She has context the facefull of naked cleavage doesn't have a context rime or reason to be here. Dude are you really that dense ? Or are you missing the fucking point on purpose ?
And I am the one who's supposedly didn't read anything while playing ...
Yeah so you purposedly miss the point ... gotcha ...My entire point is that she's an illusion used to misguide the player. Whatever you see is up to the caster. If you don't like that then that's your choice, but it's the truth.
Okay, so you apparently have an axe to grind with Dark Souls and think they're fan service bait. Noted.
Exactly the vibe you've been giving off since your very first message where you quoted me so you didn't exactly change much of your tune really ...Okay, so you apparently have an axe to grind with Dark Souls and think they're fan service bait. Noted.
Well I am pretty confident that those will probably change and be fleshed out at some point.Sorry but this is blatant copy and not "inspired-by" title , just look at the UI and knight design .
I think she's supposed to be evocative of reclining venus paintings from the renaissance which were typically nudes. I get that you don't like the nudity but I don't think you've managed to make your case that it's unjustified any more than anyone else has managed to make the case that it's "absolutely necessary." I don't know on what basis you find her so objectionable, but I can certainly see why if you did, you'd be quite disposed to not liking a game like this. I can't speak at all to its quality, and frankly am not particularly interested in this game, but it definitely feels like titillation isn't an incidental inclusion in this game, but a huge part of its basis for appeal. You want something else, and while I hope you also find that game, complaining that this game isn't a different game entirely feels like you're the one with the axe to grind.And I kept repeating you that the character herself wasn't what I took issue with but with the gratuituous and let me repeat once again and for the last time facefull of naked boobs that's what's gratuituous and uncalled for .
Like seriously, the most bizarre criteria for exclusion of a whole host of games that otherwise would satisfy your needs. Why is this a key selling point, except that it puts this game in a somehow negative light for not being something else?
You probably already know about Nioh but if you don't you should check it out, it's the perfect example of taking inspiration (in this case the souls formula) and making it your own. The only thing is that Nioh focuses a lot more on combat and not so much exploration since the game is level based.Every time I want to play something like Dark Soule, I can't find anything and end up playing Darin Souls again.
If anything we don't have enough aping of Dark Souls.
Where did I say that I didn't like the Souls Games ? Please show me where ?I think she's supposed to be evocative of reclining venus paintings from the renaissance which were typically nudes. I get that you don't like the nudity but I don't think you've managed to make your case that it's unjustified any more than anyone else has managed to make the case that it's "absolutely necessary." I don't know on what basis you find her so objectionable, but I can certainly see why if you did, you'd be quite disposed to not liking a game like this. I can't speak at all to its quality, and frankly am not particularly interested in this game, but it definitely feels like titillation isn't an incidental inclusion in this game, but a huge part of its basis for appeal. You want something else, and while I hope you also find that game, complaining that this game isn't a different game entirely feels like you're the one with the axe to grind.
Where did that poster actually state you didn't like the souls games in that post?Where did I say that I didn't like the Souls Games ? Please show me where ?
All this is useful feedback! Thanks so much for sharing regardless whether it's positive or negative, it's all good feedback.
Here he said it hereWhere did that poster actually state you didn't like the souls games in that post?
but I can certainly see why if you did, you'd be quite disposed to not liking a game like this.
As I read that he was referring to the game this thread was originally supposed to be focused on, not the souls games.
That's not how it reads to me , to me it's the exact opposite.Edit: Reread, context seems to pretty clearly state they're talking about you not liking Neverinth, not disliking souls.
Your need for an explicit reason for a fertility goddess having a cleavage window suggests otherwise. As as for the conversation focusing on it, it was brought up and cosigned by you as an example to stand against the souls games.And again I'm no zero sexualization zealot it just needs to be appropriate and have a correct time and place.
It... changes everything in fact?Real quick question "does it change anything about the fact that a completely gratuitous gigantic facefull of boobs has been thrown at you for no other reason than because some jackass at the marketing department asked for it ?????"
Oh yeah because me relishing in the sexualization of the male characters in the Guilty Gear series elsewhere , on resetera and defending said sexualisation even breaking down an entire design to a fellow bisexual man who's an artist who didn't knew the references is sooo much making me the prude ...Your need for an explicit reason for a fertility goddess having a cleavage window suggests otherwise.
I mean you see Iain Garner the only thing that's missing to make me wanna call the cops on your asses is for the models to look legitimately underage ...
All that just sounds like incredibly different standards for appropriateness of sexualization. It doesn't actually mesh with your position here, but rather paints it as inconsistent.Oh yeah because me relishing in the sexualization of the male characters in the Guilty Gear series elsewhere , on resetera and defending said sexualisation even breaking down an entire design to a fellow bisexual man who's an artist who didn't knew the references is sooo much making me the prude ...
And me in that very same thread moaning and bitching that if DOA designers will go full bore sexualization of their female characters could they at least think of gay dudes / bi dudes , and ladies and do just the same to male characters is also sooo much making me being a prude.
Once again Gwynevere is a call back to the Sinovere Baldaquin her tiara and the entire interior and furniture was enough the facefull of naked boobs was just there for gratuituous titilation .