I'm watching Scare Tactics clips on YouTube right now. Hosted by Tracy Morgan. lol
Gig economy is upon us.This seems like a shift in messaging now though, where the communication before was definitely "first day at a new job" and now they're saying "it was clear that this was a one-day hourly gig" so it'll be interesting to see if that's the case.
I'm watching Scare Tactics clips on YouTube right now. Hosted by Tracy Morgan. lol
With the way people were reacting you would think they were pranking starving children or something.
Relevant critique in the way some people are handling outrage and directing it toward the kid.
Watch the video.I'll admit I have not watched this and it may be addressed, but he's 16 which I would call teenager/young adult and not kid. Kid to me implies like 7 to 12 years old.
Yeah if someone is this desperate that doesn't make it any better. Especially because if this is a "prank" clearly someone is getting out of this disappointed. Or they're at least tricked into believing they should be disappointed which is still shitty.It's actually sounds worse, people that do daily temp work are usually one step from disaster. There is a reason people look for a "Steady" job
Yeah if someone is this desperate that doesn't make it any better. Especially because if this is a "prank" clearly someone is getting out of this disappointed. Or they're at least tricked into believing they should be disappointed which is still shitty.
Don't know what that show is, but yeah it is shitty if the "prank" is getting someone without a job to think they have a shot at getting a legitimate occupation as with the OP's topic.Is there any indication on what type of pranks happen on the show? Would you say something like the Carbinaro show is "shitty"?
Which doesn't make it any better. It's still disgusting.They really, really needed to explain that this was a oddjobs gig up front. What a disaster from their media team.
It really does. Advertising a 1 day only gig job, having it be a prank show where that person gets paid and almost certainly is getting paid extra in order to get them to sign for the use of their likeness/footage is not unethical in the slightest. Someone is still getting paid (and probably getting paid extra) without the issues that come with someone planning their life around a fake fulltime job.
This definitely makes a difference.They should have mentioned it was a one-day gig type job from the beginning. Still kinda shitty though.
Nah. It's still bad. As Slayven has pointed out repeatedly in this thread.It really does. Advertising a 1 day only gig job, having it be a prank show where that person gets paid and almost certainly is getting paid extra in order to get them to sign for the use of their likeness/footage is not unethical in the slightest. Someone is still getting paid (and probably getting paid extra) without the issues that come with someone planning their life around a fake fulltime job.
We clearly have very different definitions of "treated like shit". This doesn't fall under that for me.Nah. It's still bad. As Slayven has pointed out repeatedly in this thread.
Just because they're getting paid, doesn't mean they should be treated like shit.
Treated poorly then.We clearly have very different definitions of "treated like shit". This doesn't fall under that for me.
They likely were. But again, that's not the point. As it's after the fact.Give me a break with all this talk of people being bullied or treated like shit. How do you know these people weren't ecstatic about the payday and appearing on a Netflix show?
Yeah if someone is this desperate that doesn't make it any better. Especially because if this is a "prank" clearly someone is getting out of this disappointed. Or they're at least tricked into believing they should be disappointed which is still shitty.
Not airing them doesn't make it magically not happen, which is still an issue. A "prank" involving getting someone to falsely think they got a job still sounds pretty bad no matter how you slice it.if they're that angry then they won't consent to their faces being on camera and their footage won't air. You need written consent to show footage of someone on TV. Removing their agency because you disagree with their choices isn't cool.
lmao classic redmercurySame company that put Norm Macdonald and Dave Chappelle saying dumb shit on the air, not surprising.
people react this way because of all the youtube """prank"""" videos which are actually just assault on unsuspecting people.Whilst I agree the initial prospect of the show was in bad taste, the insane reaction blindly ignored that these shows are nearly always completely fake and are made up of 90% actors.
Because it's a garbage unfunny format designed for people who can only have fun at other people's expense.
It's almost like no one on the internet has ever watched a prank show before.
A "prank" involving getting someone to falsely think they got a job still sounds pretty bad no matter how you slice it.
From the way Netflix described it, it was a show about mocking people struggling to find work and psychologicaly beating then when they were down.
Nothing in the statement Netflix put out suggests anything of the sort.
"First day on the job" does suggest more than one day of work, but there is nothing about "mocking people struggling to find work" (or anything about "people struggling to find work" at all) and nothing about "psychologically beating" anyone. Anything other than people starting a new job being subjected to a scary prank is just projection.
What this thread has taught me is that if you tell someone you are looking for work, they'll automatically think of you as a victim, as some kind of hopeless loser struggling to get by. Someone in need of protection from big bad companies rather than their own shitty condescension.
I don't think that about you, or anyone else (including me) in that situation.I'm referring to the condescension shown by those criticizing Netflix, assuming that people looking for work (or willing to take on a one day gig), people like me, are hopeless losers in "shitty situations".
I'm referring to the condescension shown by those criticizing Netflix, assuming that people looking for work (or willing to take on a one day gig), people like me, are hopeless losers in "shitty situations".
This can't be said enough, haha. The faux-outrage culture is real.Netflix to Buzzfeed: Promote our tame new prank show with an artificial story about a backlash. Here are three or four tweets of people complaining in cliched ways, be sure to embed that. Now quick, defend the show, other people! Hey, what do you know, now suddenly people have heard of this thing.
?
And I'm just projecting. I'm not using an extremely basic level of human empathy to empathize with how people in shitty situations would feel not having money to pay bills or for food. Not doing that at all. Just projecting.
Actually, you know what, they should just put on their job helmets, squeeze into the job cannon and fire off into job land where jobs grow on jobbies.
Well yeah, you are projecting here. You're assuming that someone taking a one-day gig is not employed elsewhere and looking for a longer-term position.