How does Iran's military compare to Iraq's in 2003? The initial conflict was over fairly quickly ("Mission Accomplished"), but the occupation... Can we please stop this obvious sabre rattling before we send another generation into an endless conflict?
Almost any Republican.What kind of a monster gets millions of people killed just so he can maybe stay in power for a few more years.
people dont want to change a sitting president during wartime.Genuinely curious. Why would a war he obviously started help him win in 2020?
Is it just as simple as 'look America is kicking some ass!'?
They might if they're against the war and the Democratic candidate promises to end it.people dont want to change a sitting president during wartime.
true but many people that are against the war in general might oppose to end the war in defeatThey might if they're against the war and the Democratic candidate promises to end it.
It's better to admit defeat in an unjust war so you can stop throwing thousands of Americans into the meatgrinder than keep fighting that unjust war, which by the way will only result in the entire Middle East being thrown into a chaos which makes everything from the past decade and a half look insignificant.true but many people that are against the war in general might oppose to end the war in defeat
people dont want to change a sitting president during wartime.
ah the bellum iustum... my question to you. does that even exist? or is there any side that would not declare its own war as just?It's better to admit defeat in an unjust war so you can stop throwing thousands of Americans into the meatgrinder than keep fighting that unjust war, which by the way will only result in the entire Middle East being thrown into a chaos which makes everything from the past decade and a half look insignificant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_military_and_paramilitary_personnelHow does Iran's military compare to Iraq's in 2003? The initial conflict was over fairly quickly ("Mission Accomplished"), but the occupation... Can we please stop this obvious sabre rattling before we send another generation into an endless conflict?
Yeah but it could be easily swooped as Iraq. Now they have nothing. Even Trump is using his old line he used for North Korea again "If Iran wants to fight, that will be the official end of Iran. Never threaten the United States again! ".I mean if Iraq didn't commit 9/11 and it passed legal muster, than so will Iran.
Hopefully this is all just hot air though
Worse then ISIS. How is that possible?Well, Western imperialism has done a lot to radicalise Iran already. Might as well go all the way and create a group even worse than ISIS.
isis with nukes?
You win :) .Didn't thought of that.
And you also winNumbers.
Iran already has sizable paramilitary reserve forces and organizations. You create a power vacuum, they'll be all over Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Oman, and the Strait of Hormuz
ISIS was mainly active in Syria and Iraq with some smaller offshoots in other countries, but never really anything which really threatened those countries' governments. You put the entire Middle East on fire, you're gonna have ISIS 2.0 in terms of numbers, and the ongoing US warmongering will for sure increase public support in those countries.
....they came up with something worse than isisThe fuck is this "winning" bullshit?
We violated a multilateral diplomatic agreement that eased tensions, prevented nuclear proliferation, improved economic relations, and did this all peacefully.
You think going to war will mean we "win?" Does life and happiness mean nothing to you?
Iran war will let iraq look like a cakewalk militarily and economically.
edited
since when did the us care about ethics?
Iran war will let iraq look like a cakewalk militarily and economically.
When did they care about economic or military feasibility either?
All I know is that at the time of Desert Storm Iraq was #4 in the world (China, Soviet Union, US, Iraq)How does Iran's military compare to Iraq's in 2003? The initial conflict was over fairly quickly ("Mission Accomplished"),
Yeah yeah. I was just thinking about the deeds they had done. Not how many there would be or what technology would be available. Sorry if I was not clear enough about "you win". It is certainly not a matter to take lightly. And I hope that sensible people prevail. All this warmongering is very scary and I hope that better times will come.ISIS was mainly active in Syria and Iraq with some smaller offshoots in other countries, but never really anything which really threatened those countries' governments. You put the entire Middle East on fire, you're gonna have ISIS 2.0 in terms of numbers, and the ongoing US warmongering will for sure increase public support in those countries.
What exactly do Americans fear when they say they don't want to change a President during a war though? I've never fully understood that.people dont want to change a sitting president during wartime.
Both Iraq and Afghanistan were easy mode. The US will be turning it up to hard mode if they fight Iran. I will feel sorry for the countless soldiers on both sides and civilians who will be killed for Trump's fucking ego.Iran war will let iraq look like a cakewalk militarily and economically.
iran would have a much easier time retaliating against S.A and Israel than they would the U.S. don't think those two countries would want to risk the potential damage.Why does everything assume any action would be taken unilaterally by the US? I imagine Saudi Arabia and Israel would be chomping at the bit to join in too
We have a history with that strategy. Nixon got tens of thousands killed by contiuing the VietNam war after our military leaders told him it was unwinnable.Start a war so the country doesn't want to switch president during conflict?
Thatsaboldstrategycotton.gif
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/22/politics/iran-troops-options/index.htmlPentagon officials are scheduled to brief senior members of President Donald Trump's national security team as soon as Thursday on a plan that could send thousands of additional US troops to the Middle East amid rising tensions with Iran, according to three US officials familiar with the effort.
The officials emphasize no decision about a deployment has been made. They also say all the troops might not be needed at once. Some could be sent quickly as a deterrence measure, others might only be sent if tensions rise to the point the US believes an attack is imminent.
It wasn't immediately clear who called for the meeting and it is not yet certain if Trump will attend, though his approval would be needed for such a significant deployment of troops.
I mean, when the goal is to justify a war with Iran, it's working exactly as intended.According to some Iranian news agencies Iran has quadrupled its production of low-enriched uranium
https://apnews.com/7783335cf2694e6e8ce4ef719d51e002
Pulling out of the nuclear deal and re-imposing sanctions sure is working out well....