The responses here are a lot different on this page than on the first page. Did the people on the first page actually watch the entire segment?
Jim goes on to say they're two different issues - one is the hacker issue, the other is the fact ND has had poor workplace conditions in the past and employees have spoken out in the past because of it. He goes on to say just because its been revealed as a hacker issue doesn't mean everybody can just get back to ignoring the workplace conditions because it wasn't a disgruntled naughty dog employee! That's what he's saying!
He also says in no way should anybody be hacking and stealing stuff and the law should come down on the perpetrators.
The title is a click baity because it could be miscontrued as two different takes. One take is that ND deserves to be hacked. Which is not what he's saying but he's cleverly implying it in his title. And the second take is that ND as a result of poor working conditions and treatment of its staff deserves to have stuff leaked.
Seems like everyone just assumed the first take on the first page of this thread. Now I don't know how you equate poor treatment with having stuff leaked, but the general gist of the video is Jim saying these AAA companies are treating the staff poorly. Is that really a bad take?
Jim goes on to say they're two different issues - one is the hacker issue, the other is the fact ND has had poor workplace conditions in the past and employees have spoken out in the past because of it. He goes on to say just because its been revealed as a hacker issue doesn't mean everybody can just get back to ignoring the workplace conditions because it wasn't a disgruntled naughty dog employee! That's what he's saying!
He also says in no way should anybody be hacking and stealing stuff and the law should come down on the perpetrators.
The title is a click baity because it could be miscontrued as two different takes. One take is that ND deserves to be hacked. Which is not what he's saying but he's cleverly implying it in his title. And the second take is that ND as a result of poor working conditions and treatment of its staff deserves to have stuff leaked.
Seems like everyone just assumed the first take on the first page of this thread. Now I don't know how you equate poor treatment with having stuff leaked, but the general gist of the video is Jim saying these AAA companies are treating the staff poorly. Is that really a bad take?