Can this thing get quality photos of planets outside our system?
lol no far from that... a planet is not bright, so its impossible to capture the closest one are in alpha centauri system, 4,367 light years away
Can this thing get quality photos of planets outside our system?
Well, you could with high contrast imaging techniques. Even then you need planets to be very massive and as far as Neptune's orbit from its star. And all you get are pixel dots.
No. In theory the Terrascope could, but that's only if it works and they try it. The Terrascope would use the Earth's atmosphere was a lens. You could easily make out other planets and their topography.
Strange how I've been hearing about this amazing piece of engineering being built for what seems like nearly half my adult life and its finally done. We're finally at the home stretch. Only a couple more years to go.
I actually saw the guy's youtube video on this and I'm glad it is gaining traction. Only one way to find out is to try it and apparently it is much, much cheaper to boot. Hopefully he gets a NASA grant soon.No. In theory the Terrascope could, but that's only if it works and they try it. The Terrascope would use the Earth's atmosphere was a lens. You could easily make out other planets and their topography.
yeah watching the videos on this thing, so many moving parts. It's the tyranny of the payload, unfortunately.It scares the hell out of me how easily even the tiniest problem could fuck up the entire thing. I suspect it will launch successfully, it's just that, once it's fully operational, there's literally nothing we can do to fix it, if something should go wrong.
We just have to hope that it gets meaningful data while it's fully functional.
Not really, but it will be able to tell us a lot more than we currently can know about them.Can this thing get quality photos of planets outside our system?
It scares the hell out of me how easily even the tiniest problem could fuck up the entire thing. I suspect it will launch successfully, it's just that, once it's fully operational, there's literally nothing we can do to fix it, if something should go wrong.
We just have to hope that it gets meaningful data while it's fully functional.
All the issues they've had with this thing, I expect the rocket to explode before it makes it past the launch tower.
I more meant that it can't be physically repaired, unlike the Hubble.They fixed a giant physical flaw in hubble's mirror with software that (reductively) translated the data from the flawed element back to normal.
No. In theory the Terrascope could, but that's only if it works and they try it. The Terrascope would use the Earth's atmosphere was a lens. You could easily make out other planets and their topography.
Probably a silly comparison but after seeing that video this made me think a project this delicate is likely to be our lifetime's equivalent of the Contact rings in terms of "don't fuck it up"-ness and potentially setting our progress back by decades if it does mess up somewhere along the line. Something tells me there isn't a second one hiding somewhere either :p
I more meant that it can't be physically repaired, unlike the Hubble.
This is some Asimov level madness. In the article it sounds like he's suggesting that the idea of using gravity as a lens is a possibility? Using the Sun as a magnifying glass would be an ironic role reversal. It's people like these that make me realise I am dumb as shit.
Fucking awesome! However, I got a bad feeling something is going to go wrong such as them finding a major error while it is in space and there would be no feasible way to currently fix it.
Same.I don't know how engineers don't shit themselves every time they work on these exceedingly delicate machines. I hope it launches on its projected date with no issues.