But you need to stand up to bullies or they'll keep getting more aggressive (USA included)And it will. Of course it will.
You said it all here. 100% it's disruptive. And it won't accomplish anything other than virtue signal and provoke China to tighten its grip on Taiwan. They've BEEN doing this.
We just spent so much time and effort trying to position this to the Chinese as an independent trip and then she tweets that this shows America stands with Taiwan lmao... At this point I'm imagining both Xi and Biden enraged by Pelosi
I mean, the travel had to go through The White House, as they provide the military escort, so despite statements downplaying support they backed Pelosi's move.Oh boyyyyy lol...hard to believe this isn't a coordinated effort by the White House. Xi prob raging reading this
From what I've read (I'm not actually in Taiwan at the moment, although I've got a Gold Card visa & I'm trying to get my family visas as well), most people in Taiwan don't care. High ranking politicians from various countries come to Taiwan periodically, China postures, nothing happens. They don't see this as anything different.
From what I understand, not only do most people not care, but a lot of people in Taiwan don't even know anything is happening. It's that insignificant.
Not really, as you are still completely ignoring Taiwan's own agency.I'd probably commission that tbh
Okay hold on
Is that better for you
It was really interesting (as someone who's learning mandarin) that I thought pinyin was some special way for English speakers to learn Chinese and was the cheaters way not used by locals etc and it is… but it's also something that came about as a way of basically advancing/modernizing their technology and became standardized amongst most people? because China and Taiwan's character systems are so vast/complicated. So when Mao and his party pushed for a new romanized way of translating Chinese characters for computing, specifically keyboards. Taiwan recognized the importance/significance of the idea, but absolutely understandably hated Mao. So they have their own version called Zhuyin (feel free to correct me if that's not entirely correct) I'm not sure how common pinyin has become in Taiwan. I was just interested to learn that history and the importance of that component of language to the Chinese and taiwanese's typing skills (faster than pretty much any other as they started developing T9 type capabilities long before the U.S etc) and culturally, socially etc. But that effectively the language itself too was split off because of the desire for distinction/independence between Communist China and Taiwan.
I'm not so sure that's true. My wife is glued to her phone atm (she watched the plane land), and it seems like it's really big news in Taiwan media.
Wait what? Sources please. China and Japan/other neighbors have pretty normal trade relationships right now, was my impression. It ain't North Korea. In fact Mainland and Taiwan have been pumping up trade in the past decade. (I am from China, but have been out of the country for a decade +, never heard of this analysis)
It was really interesting (as someone who's learning mandarin) that I thought pinyin was some special way for English speakers to learn Chinese and was the cheaters way not used by locals etc and it is… but it's also something that came about as a way of basically advancing/modernizing their technology and became standardized amongst most people? because China and Taiwan's character systems are so vast/complicated. So when Mao and his party pushed for a new romanized way of translating Chinese characters for computing, specifically keyboards. Taiwan recognized the importance/significance of the idea, but absolutely understandably hated Mao. So they have their own version called Zhuyin (feel free to correct me if that's not entirely correct) I'm not sure how common pinyin has become in Taiwan. I was just interested to learn that history and the importance of that component of language to the Chinese and taiwanese's typing skills (faster than pretty much any other as they started developing T9 type capabilities long before the U.S etc) and culturally, socially etc. But that effectively the language itself too was split off because of the desire for distinction/independence between Communist China and Taiwan.
(Again really sorry if I'm off on anything, do not mind being straightened out or clarified on this. May also not be the right place/time but I think it kind of speaks to the independence of Taiwan a bit).
I work in a Taiwan research institute. It's a fantastic place that I love dearly, a consolidated democracy with progressive politics for East Asia in many regards. If it was a realistic possibility, I'd love for Taiwan to be an independent country. But it's not possible when the PRC is your neighbor and threatening your right to exist.
Therefore, I was hoping Pelosi would not make the trip. I am not sure if you all are aware, but Xi Jinping is in an extremly difficult spot right now. The economy has been close to a recession, he's not getting Covid sorted and he wants his tenure to be extended in autumn. In China, there has been decades of state-induced nationalistic education in their schools, and many of these are now very vocal and extremly loud nationalists pressuring the government to take a hard stance and act (my Chinese colleague just texted me that the nationalists are already heavily attacking Xi that he didn't prevent the trip from happening). Basically, the Communist Party cannot back down in conflicts even if it wanted to. Leaders under pressure can make very bad decisions in foreign policy.
I understand that Taipeh feels like it must fight back against the diplomatic isolation that China is continuing to pursue. I was in favor of the clear commitment the US gave for Taiwan's safety earlier this year. But I don't want this great island to end up like Hongkong, and today has made it more likely, and that's why I fear this was not the right move.
I think sometimes in these times we are so keen in setting signals (of support etc.) that we can forget if the decisions in the long-term will really achieve what we want, which in this case is a continuously free Taiwan.
Also, the really funny/sad thing is that China could probably completely save their economy right now just by recognizing Taiwan's status as an independent country. The huge influx of trade from Taiwan, Japan, and other countries in the region would be a huge boon to them.
Well...the genocide and war crimes as official state strategy for one.
Did what happened in Hong Kong occur as a result of some overt show of Western solidarity?I work in a Taiwan research institute. It's a fantastic place that I love dearly, a consolidated democracy with progressive politics for East Asia in many regards. If it was a realistic possibility, I'd love for Taiwan to be an independent country. But it's not possible when the PRC is your neighbor and threatening your right to exist.
Therefore, I was hoping Pelosi would not make the trip. I am not sure if you all are aware, but Xi Jinping is in an extremly difficult spot right now. The economy has been close to a recession, he's not getting Covid sorted and he wants his tenure to be extended in autumn. In China, there has been decades of state-induced nationalistic education in their schools, and many of these are now very vocal and extremly loud nationalists pressuring the government to take a hard stance and act (my Chinese colleague just texted me that the nationalists are already heavily attacking Xi that he didn't prevent the trip from happening). Basically, the Communist Party cannot back down in conflicts even if it wanted to. Leaders under pressure can make very bad decisions in foreign policy.
I understand that Taipeh feels like it must fight back against the diplomatic isolation that China is continuing to pursue. I was in favor of the clear commitment the US gave for Taiwan's safety earlier this year. But I don't want this great island to end up like Hongkong, and today has made it more likely, and that's why I fear this was not the right move.
I think sometimes in these times we are so keen in setting signals (of support etc.) that we can forget if the decisions in the long-term will really achieve what we want, which in this case is a continuously free Taiwan.
Last thoughts: After China's threats over the past few days, Pelosi could not back down anymore. That's also true but I'm not talking about that but the decision per se.
If we assume post Ukraine invasion that China is considering an invasion would a preemptive sign of unwavering support to head it off not be a good idea?I work in a Taiwan research institute. It's a fantastic place that I love dearly, a consolidated democracy with progressive politics for East Asia in many regards. If it was a realistic possibility, I'd love for Taiwan to be an independent country. But it's not possible when the PRC is your neighbor and threatening your right to exist.
Therefore, I was hoping Pelosi would not make the trip. I am not sure if you all are aware, but Xi Jinping is in an extremly difficult spot right now. The economy has been close to a recession, he's not getting Covid sorted and he wants his tenure to be extended in autumn. In China, there has been decades of state-induced nationalistic education in their schools, and many of these are now very vocal and extremly loud nationalists pressuring the government to take a hard stance and act (my Chinese colleague just texted me that the nationalists are already heavily attacking Xi that he didn't prevent the trip from happening). Basically, the Communist Party cannot back down in conflicts even if it wanted to. Leaders under pressure can make very bad decisions in foreign policy.
I understand that Taipeh feels like it must fight back against the diplomatic isolation that China is continuing to pursue. I was in favor of the clear commitment the US gave for Taiwan's safety earlier this year. But I don't want this great island to end up like Hongkong, and today has made it more likely, and that's why I fear this was not the right move.
I think sometimes in these times we are so keen in setting signals (of support etc.) that we can forget if the decisions in the long-term will really achieve what we want, which in this case is a continuously free Taiwan.
Last thoughts: After China's threats over the past few days, Pelosi could not back down anymore. That's also true but I'm not talking about that but the decision per se.
Well...the genocide and war crimes as official state strategy for one.
Is there anything on the perspective from the people of Taiwan?
Little pink?Its just another politician from another country coming to say they support Taiwan, but wont recognize us as a independent country, and China will fly plane to our ADZ and ban some product and Japan or Korea will buy it.
And its fun to see the little pink going crazy on their universe.
Were more focused on other thing, this was more of a bet money if she land or not.
Fucking stupid takeAmerica has one national sport.
And that is, getting the most expensive stick possible and using it to poke sleeping bears, and then kneeling in front of a flag in solemn remembrance of all the 18 year olds it sent to die against the enraged bear they claim to have nothing to do with.
The last time that happened was 1898.The US has annexed territory many times. It still has colonies.
In the modern era.It has been official state policy and the US has supported tons of war crimes for a very long time. The Jarkata Method shows this.
The US has annexed territory many times. It still has colonies.
No, I don't. What are you referring to?
I see the trolls have succeeded in derailing the thread and making it about US invasions when that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
In the modern era.
Post Vietnam saw a rapid change in how we conduct war. If you can't see that perhaps educated yourself and follow what is happening in Ukraine thord.
You're still doing it.Marshall Islands were annexed then.
Same with folks bringing up Russia too, yes?
I won't deny there was a change but if you don't think America still doesn't commit nor encourage other countries to commit war crimes then I'm not sure what to tell you.
So...you agree there's a difference between Russia and the US!Marshall Islands were annexed then.
Same with folks bringing up Russia too, yes?
I won't deny there was a change but if you don't think America still doesn't commit nor encourage other countries to commit war crimes then I'm not sure what to tell you.
Yes, the US is not currently doing the exact same thing that Russia is currently doing. That's a given.
No
No, they weren't. That's a complete misunderstanding of the situation.
I love how every single thread about important international politics somehow transforms into people cynically dropping by making quips about one minor US domestic thing or another.
Guys, I assure you, US strategic policy in the Pacific has nothing to do with student debts or whatever.
Thanks for the clarification. It was really fascinating to learn about that shift. Like I said I kept thinking, oh I'm learning incorrectly because it's the "convenient" but shortcut way. Learning that while that is true, it's also the current way of learning for native people as well. How much of the part about shifting to being able to use it for keyboards is true?You don't need to be sorry, it's messy history
Chinese language originally had no phonetic notation system. Chinese scholars tried to invent such a system since late 19 century so people can have better education. zhuyin(注音) system was invented in 1908 by famous scholar Zhang Taiyan. Government of ROC adapted his system, made some revisions and made it official phonetic notation system for Chinese.
After civil war, both ROC and PRC continued to use this system. But PRC developed their own 'Pinyin(拼音)' system in 1950s and ban the use of Zhuyin. Taiwan, as ROC's successor, has been using Zhuyin until this day.
I"m actually curious what the right-wing media is saying about this (but am not going to watch/read to find out). Theoretically they should be for this visit, and half of the Republican Senators support it publicly. But on the other hand ... Pelosi.It's also stupid because it doesn't actually take attention away from anything. Our right wing media and the Republican outrage machine marches on and dictates the conversation literally regardless of what is actually happening in the world.
It happens every time.I see the 'everything would be great if we just appeased bullies' takes have started
I'm betting they don't talk about it very much unless China does something they can scare their viewers with.I"m actually curious what the right-wing media is saying about this (but am not going to watch/read to find out). Theoretically they should be for this visit, and half of the Republican Senators support it publicly. But on the other hand ... Pelosi.