It's rather annoying when people just jump to calling it hand waving when you are just stating that most companies operate this way with digital accounts.
Ah okay, I thought I was going crazy. More consumer protections is good for all of us.
LMAO, what? My credit card got cloned around 3 months ago and someone used it and spent more and $1000 on it and I only discovered when the bill came. I shouldn't have requested a charge back? Should I have paid, blocked the card and moved on? Do you people live in the real world?you should never resort to a chargeback unless it's with someone you don't plan on ever doing business with again.
The anti customer part is locking you from all your stuff. No matter what company does it yes it is anti customer. If I'm locked out of my account that has Thousands of dollars of content for a charge back on a $15 charge that's fucked up.I am sorry your account was suspended for a perfectly valid reason.
protecting people from fraud is not anti-consumer
you should be able to resolve it if the customer service will listen
Your credit card company doesn't have systems in place for this?LMAO, what? My credit card got cloned around 3 months ago and someone used it and spent more and $1000 on it and I only discovered when the bill came. I shouldn't have requested a charge back? Should I have paid, blocked the card and moved on? Do you people live in the real world?
what am i reading herecall me not being empathetic enough all you want but even though this is a valid reason ("People make mistakes"), it's not a valid excuse.
Giving people a pass on mistakes will only allow the same person to continue making the same mistakes.
Yes they do, but systems fail sometimes and it failed this time, plus, the cloners have a method to make this work, as they did. They don't buy stuff for high prices one after the other, they wait days, buy small priced stuff and whatnot.Your credit card company doesn't have systems in place for this?
Why would you need to request a chargeback for theft? LmaoLMAO, what? My credit card got cloned around 3 months ago and someone used it and spent more and $1000 on it and I only discovered when the bill came. I shouldn't have requested a charge back? Should I have paid, blocked the card and moved on? Do you people live in the real world?
What? No one is allowed to make mistakes and learning from them? How do you think people learn? How do you think the process of learning works? How do you think children grow?call me not being empathetic enough all you want but even though this is a valid reason ("People make mistakes"), it's not a valid excuse.
Giving people a pass on mistakes will only allow the same person to continue making the same mistakes.
So I don't have to pay for what I haven't bought?
So you first come to Era to complain before checking your mail for possible information?
What they mean is, in that case you call the credit card company, tell them the card was stolen and what charges you didn't do, and they take care of it as a case of credit card theft while issuing you a new card. You shouldn't use the chargeback system in such a case.
Credit card companies will happily refund the fraudulent charges when you report your card stolen, theres no need to do a chargeback.
Yeah, this is why I am confused.Credit card companies will happily refund the fraudulent charges when you report your card stolen, theres no need to do a chargeback.
Are you saying you want to continue letting the thief take your money? You should really reread that.LMAO, what? My credit card got cloned around 3 months ago and someone used it and spent more and $1000 on it and I only discovered when the bill came. I shouldn't have requested a charge back? Should I have paid, blocked the card and moved on? Do you people live in the real world?
I actually had this happen to me a few years ago. My account was set up for auto renewal and on the day of renewal I noticed that my credit card was charged twice. Clearly not right, I decided to contact Sony support, explained what happened and the rep on the phone said, and I shit you not, "I can give you a one-time PSN store credit as a favor". Sony charged my credit card twice, yet they insist that Sony are doing me a favor by giving me a PSN store credit. This was an absolute kick in the pants as I seldom purchased items on the PSN store apart from the subscription and some DLC. I ended up having this credit on the account for years. In fact, I think I still have a few dollars left 😂.I had something similar happen a few years ago before I knew Sony's asinine policy I disputed a charge because I thought I bought a single year of Plus but I was charged twice. So I called my card company and had the 2nd charge cancelled. My PSN was banned, lost everything, however I called Sony and they let me just charge the amount again and I got the account back. Wasn't that happy they didn't let me just not have to buy the 2nd year, but it was worth not losing years of stuff.
It also helped justify me never going digital for games unless they don't have a physical version, fuck losing everything you actually paid for, for something like that.
LMAO, what? My credit card got cloned around 3 months ago and someone used it and spent more and $1000 on it and I only discovered when the bill came. I shouldn't have requested a charge back? Should I have paid, blocked the card and moved on? Do you people live in the real world?
Indeed. this whole you're either with or against has gotten tiring especially when somewhere like the "middle" is now seen as a terrible terrible place.
Why are you being so fucking hostile about a hacked vita?
there was a story a while ago about some people getting the collection for more than 50 people on their account or something like that and getting banned. you don't have to worry about that if you aren't doing that on a mass scale. those people were charging people to get them the games for their accounts with their ps5.What is this about? I bought a PS5, do I get access to PSN collection for a certain amount of time for free?
Honestly can't believe anyone would defend this practice from Sony. I can understand why they'd want to discourage this behavior but, at the very least, they should give you a pass with a warning on the first occurrence.
IMO, locking you out of all your purchases should never be the end result unless you were doing something criminal.
Agreed. That's exactly what I do too.Situations like this are why I never save credit card info. I always buy codes and redeem them.
Kids use their parents' credit cards constantly for digital purchases. Not to mention families let people use cards for digital purposes for gift giving etc within families. Again, Sony needs to put in place a three strikes policy with dedicated support channels to assess how and why the chargeback occurred so they can best communicate to the account owner why they shouldn't do this and what steps they can take to make sure it doesn't happen again. It's not fucking hard.The thread title is wrong. OP didn't get banned because of a chargeback but because of committing fraud. He isn't the one who did the chargeback. The card didn't belong to him. His mom did the chargeback and rightly so! She didn't authorize this purchase or give her son permission to use the card.
Yes, the OP didn't know whose card he was using, btw never use a card that you don't know who it belongs to, and was being ignorant and careless.
OP i hope you learn from this and be less careless. And get your act together and sort out whose is whose card.
I'm just saying... Sony needs to do better in the customer service department, and this policy is a prime example of it. I've only ever personally had to resort to a chargeback a few times in my life, but I wasn't blacklisted by the companies I succeeded in securing one from. I would never dare attempt one with Sony, which I guess is their intent, but the few times I've actually needed customer service over the years it's only ever been frustrating.Most companies I've ever dealt with nuke your account from orbit and ban you if you do a chargeback, due to it being fraud. So I doubt you'll get a pass on a first occurrence for that reason alone.
Locking someone out of the content they already bought should be changed, but likely you'll still be banned from playing online, accessing PSN, etc.
this is so easy to believeHonestly can't believe anyone would defend this practice from Sony.
I mean, as already posted Sony does have a support form for an customer to pay back the fees and get their account working again:Kids use their parents' credit cards all the time. Again, Sony needs to put in place a three strikes policy with dedicated support channels to assess how and why the chargeback occurred so they can beat communicate to the account owner why LN they shouldn't do this and what steps they can take to make sure it doesn't happen again. It's not fucking hard.
Has this already been posted? You can very easily pay back the debt here:
How to reverse a PSN suspension for account debt
If your payment method has had a charge reversed on a PlayStation™Store purchase, this can result in your account being restricted from accessing PlayStation™Network (PSN).www.playstation.com
Back in the day, we called this "friendly fraud", aka fraud committed by a family member or known person.
thisiresetera.gif
Yup. Ever since that breach in...2011?...I've never put in my credit card info on my consoles. PS Plus, Netflix, etc I get off Amazon or something. Is it really that inconvenient to purchase x-amount off Amazon and wait two seconds to get that digital code?? Not saying the Amazons are 100% secure fortresses, but the less places that have my card info, the better.
this is tangential, but I'd say my reasoning above could be classified as a "middle position"
the middle is pretty often a terrible place to be, though, and putting it on a pedestal is quite bad
IIRC only company that doesn't anymore is Valve and you still cant do anything further on your Steam account if it happens but you do keep your purchases.