He went straight from talking about a Bernie victory to talking about how the generals in France caved in when faced with a Nazi defeat. You're being disingenuous by claiming that the point about the Nazi invasion wasn't related to the Bernie victory. He didn't just decide to talk about WW2 history for no reason.
The thread title says Matthew's compared Bernie to the Nazis, not that he called him one directly. That's accurate. I don't get what you're arguing.
And yet in that comparison the winners are the Nazis, probably should have used literally any other example in the world of hubris, huh?
It's almost like this choice was probably deliberate as a way to compare Bernie to Nazi's while trying to pretend that's not what he was actually trying to do
You must have Trends FOR YOU enabled.
That's referencing a Nazi invasion. It's also the same guy that references public executions when talking about Sanders. Dispite his rants, he's not stupid. He knows history and has been doing his job for a very long time. I don't see why he should get the benefit of the doubt, especially when it's become a pattern of his to reference violent murderous regimes and personal cruelty when discussing Bernie.
Earlier today he was talking about how maybe 4 more years of Trump isn't so bad compared to Bernie heading the Dems. But go on.
CNN and MSNBC never "literally" say anything. They pay guests to say things, they present thing as hypotheticals, they quote random right wing people, they purposely misrepresent things subtlely with their graphics to get their point across. You don't really think a corporate media company making hundreds of millions of dollars a year would be that daft do you?
