I haven't really seen Sony much acknowledge MS at all either directly or indirectly like this tweet does.
in the distant past? Sure
MS just seems a lot more vocal lately in calling out Sony even when some of these things are completely non-issues
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
I haven't really seen Sony much acknowledge MS at all either directly or indirectly like this tweet does.
in the distant past? Sure
MS just seems a lot more vocal lately in calling out Sony even when some of these things are completely non-issues
Oh...so we are doing this 'tit for tat' by using a previous marketing tactic more than half a decade ago from Sony....
Maybe I need to dig up something from xbox marketing in the og xbox days in the mid-2000s to counter your argument /s
So does Sony though. Lets not pretend that both platform holders haven't attempted to appease their respective lowest common denominators with this type of low level sniping.
User Banned (5 days): Drive-by trolling, history of console wars
B..b... but what about RDNA 3.0??
Lmao, no one is "offended".Wow at people being offended that MS is marketing their consoles.
And MS can of course market their console. The issue that people have is the wording that MS uses. They know they can get people (fanboys) riled up by using the word "full" in this context. They could've easily said "These are some of the features Xbox Series S/X use from RDNA2". Instead, they decided to feed fanboys by saying "only Xbox Series X/S have full RDNA2.".
It'd be like Sony claiming only the PS5 will give gamers instant load times or only the PS5 will give gamers immersive 3D Audio. They don't claim either. They do say the PS5 will give gamers both, though.
MS know what they're doing.
Console warriors at the moment.
Seriously it's marketing. People gotta chill, it's a normal thing for companies to tout features. As long as games look great they can call it RDNA potato and I'd be happy.
Seriously it's marketing. People gotta chill, it's a normal thing for companies to tout features. As long as games look great they can call it RDNA potato and I'd be happy.
We will soon know what they bought from AMD
They have their own custom solutions for the stuff they didn't buy off of AMD
everyone needs to cool down
User banned (3 days): platform wars, related prior warning
Considering the well documented embrace of Micosoft's toxic fanboy culture, they very much enjoy the running narrative fueled by fanboys gleefully posting, "Trash console! RDNA 1.5!" in every comment section of a PS5 related news article.
The comment section of the thread only proves that lol
It is what it is.
The comment section of the thread only proves that lol
It is what it is.
"We believe in generations" while hiding PS4 versions of Horizon 2 and Miles morales.
This. Let us remember how ERA lost their shit when Xbox revealed the evil and dreaded Smart Delivery.Wow at people being offended that MS is marketing their consoles.
This thread is nuts. The PS5 still has the main architecture improvements of RDNA2, just missing a few features. If I had to guess I'd say this is possibly a result of Sony finalizing their chip design before all the RDNA2 hardware features were in.
If situations were reversed, Sony would be marketing it as well. People are acting like they've been personally attacked or something. Relax.
If situations were reversed, Sony would be marketing it as well. People are acting like they've been personally attacked or something. Relax.
We don't even know which of the RDNA2 features won't be on the PS5. What if it's just something like "sampler feedback" which is unimportant and developed by Microsoft. Mesh shades are nice but only benefit a few games.
Can't imagine it's VRS because that would be a biggie for an eye-tracking PSVR 2 headset, unless Sony has their own hardware powered solution for this.
Point is, we don't know which, so what are we even talking about?
Can't imagine it's VRS because that would be a biggie for an eye-tracking PSVR 2 headset, unless Sony has their own hardware powered solution for this.
Point is, we don't know which, so what are we even talking about?
About that, since I don't follow the console market that closely, is it actually possible to determine the existence or absense of specific features on a console platform without the developers or console manufacturer disclosing it?
Source? How do you know these are merely 'in-house solutions'?
The Xbox Wire blog post says
This clearly talks about hardware integrations vs the direct x stuff you and many others here seem to expect it to be.
Dude, you see this shit in every industry. Marketing is doing their job to make their product look good. Why wouldn't they go there and rile up the fans, lol. Anyways, what they're claiming isn't even wrong so what's the issue?
This is strange. Not the tweet. That's just marketing doin it's thing. What's strange is how some act like they have to defend the PS5's honor. It's not like what's being said is that big of a deal.
Some just can't give the Xbox an inch in any regard.
Some just can't give the Xbox an inch in any regard.
Wow at people being offended that MS is marketing their consoles.
Lmao this covers my thoughts so well and gave me a good laugh.
Larry's tweet is innocent enough. Nothing wrong with talking to a hardware guy about how they are implementing all of the RDNA2 features. I mean the initial tweet was enough to know what they are trying to do here.
Do you even what's directx or api for that matter for God's sakes. Your post (question) wouldn't even exist if you even understand what it is.
Wait, does this mean that Xbox Series X has 128 mb of Infinity Cache? That's a core RDNA 2 hardware feature.
If you want to make console wars, at least have the courage to use your real account.
if they cant make a difference in games what's their point then....?
Wow at people being offended that MS is marketing their consoles.
Wow yes it's pretty much this.
Well that's conformation that Xbox Series X will support AMD's machine learning upscaler / DLSS equivalent. That's exciting - especially for the Xbox Series S.
Hopefully Sony has a similar solution within the RDNA 2 features they support, or in addition to them.
Hopefully Sony has a similar solution within the RDNA 2 features they support, or in addition to them.
So I guess they had to wait after the AMD conference to release that info. Still great and I can't wait to see what VRS will be able to do on the future!
Obvious. The goal post always moves for some. First it's all features Xbox announced are part of RDNA2, thus PS5 has them aswell. Then it was PS5 has some RDNA3 features and Xbox might actually be RDNA1. And now it's MS being a console warrior, despite just announcing what they feel is a advantage.
Camells
Do you have proof for your assumptions? Both are RDNA2 based, but until now it was never said which consoles support all the features. It could be Sony just opting for their own solution instead. But we don't know this and it's simply a assumption, when someone says there is feature parity without any evidence.
Probably best to directly respond to posts you take issue with and give reasons why.
Cerny has literally spoken about this before so maybe sounds like you have the personal issue.
Sony did this in the PS4 gen and it was bullshit as well
On topic I'm really interested in ML super resolution thing. Is this AMD's respond to DLSS? I experience first hand how awesome DLSS was when playing Death stranding on my PC. It would be awesome if consoles get something like it.
Are you sure? I know we have the Geometry Engine for primitive shaders, but where has it been said that it support mesh shaders?
They did it literally three months ago with that "we believe in generations" spiel.
so it seems they've been waiting for this AMD conference before making this announcement. I am curious to know what full RDNA2 integration means now. Dictator can you explain? what do you think this all means?