I think I see the point of contention here. You think the MrBeast channel is a self-sustaining business. I do not. I think MrBeast is vital to the MrBeast business.
I think you misunderstand what my "usual thing" is. My "thing" isn't "rah rah eat the rich" though I admit there is a lot of that. My "thing" is people should be duly compensated for the full value of their labor. MrBeast is valuable, as a brand, to the MrBeast channel, therefore I see very little wrong with him being compensated to the extent that he is. The fact that society apparently values entertainers more than it does nurses or teachers indeed annoys me, but it is a different problem and a different discussion. On the other hand, there are a lot of highly paid executives that are merely replaceable parts and they're paid out of proportion to their theoretical social value. And don't even get me started on landlords.
I just want valuable labor to be compensated in proportion to its social usefulness. Entertainment is valued very highly in modern society. I generally do not mind entertainers being paid handsomely. Human society needs entertainers, it does not really need business executives. They are superfluous, ironically, they are more superfluous the more sophisticated their business is.
