Not ever has a movie wrecked me so hard, on so many levels, over a long period of time. It really is hard to recommend, but it is such a once in a lifetime movie.
Not ever has a movie wrecked me so hard, on so many levels, over a long period of time. It really is hard to recommend, but it is such a once in a lifetime movie.
This was my vote as well. One of the few films I wish I could go back and unwatch. Remember reading review with a good rating and then watched all the way to the end for the justification and nope.A Serbian Film/Srpski Film
There's not a single redeeming quality about the film inside or out. It's 104 minutes of total depravity with the loosest justification for it's existence.
Not sure if it's the most depressing film I've ever seen, but I can't shake how hollow I felt after seeing Under The Skin.
Good pick, watched this a few weeks ago and it definitely made me freak out more about the Russia situation.
Mick Jackson was hired to direct the film, as he had previously worked in the area of nuclear apocalypse in 1982, producing the BBC Q.E.D. documentary A Guide to Armageddon.[SUP][9][/SUP][SUP][10][/SUP] This was considered a breakthrough at the time, considering the previous banning of The War Game, which BBC staff believed would have resulted in mass suicides if aired. Jackson subsequently travelled around the UK and the US, consulting leading scientists, psychologists, doctors, defence specialists and strategic experts in order to create the most realistic depiction of nuclear war possible for his next film.[SUP][11][/SUP] Jackson consulted various sources in his research, including the 1983 Science article Nuclear Winter: Global Consequences of Multiple Nuclear Explosions, penned by Carl Sagan and James B. Pollack. Details of a possible attack scenario and the extent of the damage were derived from Doomsday, Britain after Nuclear Attack (1983), while the ineffective post-war plans of the UK government came from Duncan Campbell's 1982 exposé War Plan UK.[SUP][12][/SUP] In portraying the psychological damage suffered by survivors, Jackson took inspiration from the behaviour of the Hibakusha[SUP][8][/SUP] and Magnus Clarke's 1982 book Nuclear Destruction of Britain.[SUP][12][/SUP] Sheffield was chosen as the main location partly because of its "nuclear-free zone" policy that made the council sympathetic to the local filming[SUP][7][/SUP] and partly because it seemed likely that the USSR would strike an industrial city in the centre of the country.[SUP][[/SUP]
In order for the horror of Threads to work, Jackson made an effort to leave some things unseen: "to let images and emotion happen in people's minds, or rather in the extensions of their imaginations."[SUP][14][/SUP] He later recalled that while BBC productions would usually be followed by phone calls of congratulations from friends or colleagues immediately after airing, no such calls came after the first screening of Threads. Jackson later "realised ... that people had just sat there thinking about it, in many cases not sleeping or being able to talk."
Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian called it a "masterpiece", writing: "It wasn't until I saw Threads that I found that something on screen could make me break out in a cold, shivering sweat and keep me in that condition for 20 minutes, followed by weeks of depression and anxiety."[SUP][35][/SUP] Sam Toy of Empire gave the film a perfect score, writing that "this British work of (technically) science fiction teaches an unforgettable lesson in true horror" and went on to praise its ability "to create an almost impossible illusion on clearly paltry funds."[SUP][36][/SUP] Jonathan Hatfull of SciFiNow gave a perfect score to the remastered DVD of the film. "No one ever forgets the experience of watching Threads. ... [It] is arguably the most devastating piece of television ever produced. It's perfectly crafted, totally human and so completely harrowing you'll think that you'll probably never want to watch it again."
This was my choice. Watching that was the deepest, hardest sucker punch a movie has ever given me. I was fucking angry watching it lol, think I literally yelled out loud at that reveal.Not ever has a movie wrecked me so hard, on so many levels, over a long period of time. It really is hard to recommend, but it is such a once in a lifetime movie.
The most depressing movie I've ever seen is probably Moonlight. Just an onslaught of misery and sadness. I know the ending is supposed to be bittersweet but everything else was so depressing that even after it I was just completely drained.
Highly recommend.
Came to post this. Absolutely beautiful. Will never watch again because it destroyed me.
Have you watched Threads? It's more or less a British response to The Day After.
my choice as well.
A Serbian Film/Srpski Film
There's not a single redeeming quality about the film inside or out. It's 104 minutes of total depravity with the loosest justification for it's existence.
I find that depressing and sad stories are so much more rare than happy ones, so I gravitate towards those by a lot. So this thread is GREAT for me hahaI sorta giggled at this. Everything about this movie is misery and depressing and it completely drains you. Definitely watch it!
I get what you're saying just the wording of it kinda made me smile. Whole thread is kinda like that. "Oh god don't remind me of the horrific experience that was that movie. If you haven't seen it yet definitely plan to do so!"
If you find Requiem for a Dream too hard to take, don't watch Christiane F:I saw this movie in my high school film production class, and it left me depressed for such a long time. I was gutted by this movie. The final 20 minutes are haunting, just a true portrait of misery that hits you at every angle.
Really GREAT movie, but damn, I do not want to watch it again.
Came to say this. Never want to experience that kind of story again. Just misery.