Rotten Tomatoes link
THR (Todd McCarthy):
while there's plenty to look at on the screen, there's little to excite the senses or stimulate the imagination. Whether there are to be three more sequels is up to the public.
The Guardian (Peter Bradshaw)
There are some lively things about Mortal Engines, and the performances are game enough. Yet in all its effortful steampunkiness, Mortal Engines isn't a film which is particularly exciting or funny, and the idea of the "traction city" is a stylistic and visual design tic that you just have to take or leave.
Polygon (Karen Han):
Mortal Engines may hit a few too many rote beats, but it stands apart from most of its contemporaries.
IndieWire (David Ehrlich):
A derivative steampunk fantasy that feels like a cross between "Fury Road" and "Final Fantasy," "Mortal Engines" isn't good, but it sure is huge.
Variety (Andrew Barker):
The movie devolves from promising to unwieldy, then baffling, then exhausting, then finally unintentionally hysterical.‐ Variety
Little White Lies (Tom Huddleston):
Mortal Engines aims high and sometimes lands – the designers deserve immense praise for their witty, imaginative work ... But as a film, this is simply too unwieldy, too busy, too wildly disordered to ever be more than a fascinating curio.
Screendaily (Sarah Ward):
although the craft is coupled with a scenario featuring ample initial intrigue, the New Zealand-shot film remains frustratingly generic. ... That said, Mortal Engines crucially takes the time to flesh out a self-contained story. Its narrative may remain inescapably familiar but, unlike many other wannabe franchise-starters, it never feels like mere sequel-bait.
Den of Geek (Adam Shepherd):
Jackson and Rivers have brought the world of Mortal Engines to life in spectacular fashion, creating environments, locations and cities that bristle with life and make us want to learn everything about them. If only the same could be said about the characters who populate it.
Last edited: