I'm sure this means buy the rest of the episodes you're missing.
It is probably a valid way of dealing with customers in your proposed way (sadly) but in this case (and still going by the assumption that the games are being pulled for redownload on all those platforms, which might not be the case) that would mean that all those platform-holders are dealing with the (also assumed, lol) unlisting because of a lack of fee payment in the same way, which is fucking over the customers and blaming the publisher. Not something I'd imagine platform-holders would want to do while reaching for an all-digital-customers reality and convincing them they have their back (for the small cost of keeping some files on their servers).
Again, the specific wording Telltale used was
"If you have purchased these seasons, please download all remaining episodes prior to the service being discontinued in June."
It's absolutely possible this was written by someone who doesn't know the specifics of games getting delisted, but the wording is quite precise.
your right. I'm playing through WD, a new frontier, and I'm having a blast. I'm going to miss this company.Telltale's games were entirely based on licensed properties. They're worthless to whoever buys them unless they can also negotiate with the IP owners to re-release them.
I meant train the consumer, not train the customer service rep. Either way is an easy situation for the customer service rep, but it's better for companies to train and set expectations now for the consumers rather than establish constant payouts as the expected response from a consumer. After all, they trained us to accept DLC and season passes as a normal thing to expect with games now.
I remember Outrun Coast2Coast was desisted on Steam when Sega lost the license, yet If you bought it in time you could (and can) still download it.
I hope that this is no different.....My son and I enjoyed playing those together.
Oh I think I got you the first time. I just meant that the platform-holders should just keep the games redownloadable as that would be the first expected reponse from consumers.
Outside of entire stores shutting down, those reports of delisted non-free games becoming no longer downloadable are usually false and based on miscommunications between the PR and the journalist.
It would be ideal but just not realistic for every single game due to licensing, contracts, companies going out of business, etc. I don't think it's fair to pin the store front as being fully responsible and liable in perpetuity for a game after a company goes out of business. That's a lot of liability to have under you and if that happens, think of the bigger picture. Let's say the liability is enough to cause the store front to go out of business. Now instead of customers who bought that title lose out on a single game from their library, you risk everyone who has ever bought anything from that store front to lose all their games.
already de-listed soo....Is Tales from the Borderlands in danger of getting the same treatment?
But I can still download it on PSN if I own it I think. And if I understand Minecraft won't be downloadable even if purchased right?
check to see if its in your download list. soo far minecraft i thinkBut I can still download it on PSN if I own it I think. And if I understand Minecraft won't be downloadable even if purchased right?
check to see if its in your download list. soo far minecraft i think
good to know for now.I just checked and I could still download, so I think I will just in case. It's the only telltale game I would genuinely miss.
I am also unable to download episode 3 of season 1 despite owning the season pass :( (US account on PS4 PSN store)
Oh boy. This does not bode well.
I do not like the future where companies shutting down means you lose access to your games
Literally just bought season 2.I imagine the physical copies will see a decent markup in price soon!
That's ok. You won't be worrying about games in 20 years anyway.
The reactions here aren't surprising because the wording clearly states that you won't be able to download it later, which is unheard of, which is why everyone is freaking out.All the reactions on here are surprising. As long as they're in business there's no way you won't be able to redownload this on psn/xbox and steam if you've already bought it after it's delisted. I'm pretty sure it would be the first game in history to do so. I can still download Punisher No mercy the online multiplayer game to my Ps3 that was delisted 8 years ago.
And before anyone says it P.T. was a free demo that was never sold so it doesn't count.
No being able to download it from the telltale store makes complete sense though. If the company no longer exists to pay the server costs
I imagine there's some contractual shenanigans. Have the rights been transferred to a liquidation administrator or something?
Hopefully someone can ask Phil Spencer about it next week.
Have you tried to get a refund, or some money back? Is that possible since you could've donated the money?Damn I forgot that I had those games through the Humble Telltale Bundle 2017 and never redeemed the keys. Now it seems that they had run out of keys whenever I try to get one :/
Is Tales from the Borderlands in danger of getting the same treatment?
So buying digital content/games is still a long rental, as usual. Hopefully someday this kind of shit will get regulated.
Y'all saying you only buy physical - how many games in the past ten years you have bought that you can install and access all content, patches and bugfixes through your disc copy?
As far as I understand licensing issues should only affect the availability to buy a product, not the ability to access an already bought product. Granted, if you bought GTA Vice City as a digital copy and the publisher patches out some music that isn't licensed for the game anymore you're out of luck. (Similar to the inability to play the day-one version of your digital copy of RDR2 when you've already downloaded a later patch.)
Y'all saying you only buy physical - how many games in the past ten years you have bought that you can install and access all content, patches and bugfixes through your disc copy?
Uh, yes? I am not saying that one thing justifies the other?Does it matter? The point is it's better to have a game rather than no game. Plus plenty of games come in the form of GOTY editions which tend to be the complete game, with patches and all DLC on the disc. So they exist.
Anyone know which TT games on disc have an entire season instead of the "Season Pass Disc"? I can't find anything online about it.
Refunds from who? The company that is no longer in business? If not them, then that has to be the store front, and you honestly expect the store front to be liable for a company going out of business to pay out millions of dollars on their behalf? I think this is the dangerous lesson people should be learning about what a digital future means. You bought into it, now lay in the bed you made.
Our representatives would laugh at this being considered any kind of legitimate concern worth legislating and it would die in committee, at best.No. Our solution is to petition our representatives in government to slap down this egregious behavior.
Uh, yes? I am not saying that one thing justifies the other?
"Plenty of games" is extremely subjective. The vast majority of games do not get a full updated/patched physical version. The amount of games with week/month 1 patches is staggering, and in a lot of cases will impact how easily you can actually play a game in the future.
My point is that going physical only is not an answer. The market is primarily digital with how it distributes games now, down to some games having physical copies that are just download codes or half installs. And even though that is not the norm, most games you bought a disc are not the same game you are playing six months later, and nobody is archiving those updates in physical form.
No. Our solution is to petition our representatives in government to slap down this egregious behavior.
How does one regulate companies that go under? There's no one to pay Telltale's fees or take payments for the game.
It should be on the storefront side, something that is part of the agreement to sell the game in the first place. As long as the storefront is active, they should be forced to host the game that was ever purchasable even if the developer/publisher goes under. It doesn't even need to be necessarily playable say if there are Windows patches that break compatibility but they should still offer the game for download.