Love we will keep getting these posts all day, lol.
No, I've found that Microsoft very much cares. They aren't perfect (no assemblage of thousands of humans is), but they absolutely care and it shows in their internal culture. I know quite a few people who work at Microsoft and lack of care is definitely not a way they would describe managers or leadership there.
Well we already knew about Bethesda before the PS5 came out.The options are bigger than ever before. Multiple platforms and services. It's overwhelming.
However if you bought a PS5 specifically for Activision and Bethesda games. Sure. I guess that didn't fucking work out.
So, again, the problem isn't that it would be a monopoly it's who would have dominant market share. That's kind of exactly the point I was making.If you include the revenue that Activision made last year ($8.1bn) as well as the projected revenue for Zenimax (around $1.5bn to $2.2bn), that would take Xbox's revenue to $25.3bn. PlayStation revenue last year was $25.04bn, a portion of that will be from the 30% store cut on mtx/digital sales of Activision titles. So yes, whilst this comparison is loose and missing context, you're wrong for suggesting that long term this could not spell a dramatic shift in market share dominance.
Don't forget, most of Bethesda's new games post acquisition, have not even been released yet. Same for Activision for some time. You have to look at these things in terms of the impact they may have 5-10+ years from now, not just today.
I get my dates messed up. And that didn't hurt Sony at all. Their 1st party is strong as fuck.
Nauseating. They don't even have to say things like this. Why does MS feel the need to mollify Kotick?
It's all smoke and mirrors man, trust me. Don't fall for it because it's strictly business right now to keep things professional. They pushed Bill Gates out for what he did so Bobby doesn't have long.Microsoft is openly praising Bobby Kotick today for his "commitment to change".
They don't give a shit about actually trying to help the people at Acti-Blizz.
I wonder if that's how they sorted the Goldeneye N64 remaster?
Well that'll kinda come down to taste but a lot of the games I like are or became multiplatform, even if a lot of that is honestly just indiesIndies sure. Good multiplatform AAA? Wasteland. Has been for nigh on a decade. That's the only reason I'm against this deal, Activision's output sucks. I'd rather it just slowly died instead of MS saving it.
Now that CoD moves to Xbox however, Sony needs to make a competitor, or put in that much more effort in its existing IP that people are willing to ignore CoD on the rival platform. Maybe a new Killzone or MAG. But now with a ton of extra money. If that succeeds, MS will have to innovate CoD into something else to breathe new life into it like they did with Halo Infinite. This pressure isn't there for multiplatform AAA, but is there for platform holders.
they will, young padawan, they will.
Wait for the next Steam Sale. It's only ~400€ around that time :D
They could always buy Bungie to make up for losing CODSony has to be kicking themselves for not developing a top tier AAA fps now it will take them years to cook up something with the quality of COD and they need quality shooters every year I dont think they can compete.
I work nights and woke up in the middle of sleep to see it so I was basically this.
Wouldn't matter. That affects Nintendo more than MS. For all intents and purposes their biggest franchises are looked upon as Sony exclusives anyway.
It's already here, will only grow as broadband/5G penetration continuesCloud gaming is never going to happen while we have such god awful internet. Ugh I don't even want to think about an all streaming future for gaming.
For now, Sony is far from being hurt. Microsoft shifted from being a weak competitor to a strong one, but as far as we can't tell it's not really affecting Sony's bottom line.I get my dates messed up. And that didn't hurt Sony at all. Their 1st party is strong as fuck.
First they came for Fallout and Elder Scrolls. Now they come for the Dudebro shooter crowds? How can you compete against that.
Well I tried it once when I had a free trial to Ultimate and everything was choppy, laggy, and looked like ass.It's already here, will only grow as broadband/5G penetration continues
In the end, it's all business. None of these companies including Microsoft gives a rat's ass about having a safe work culture. These companies are too big to fail.
Are people upset that Sony might get less revenue in the future or that Microsoft might one day be in the position Sony is in right now where they become the leader in revenue? Neither case points to a monopoly.If you include the revenue that Activision made last year ($8.1bn) as well as the projected revenue for Zenimax (around $1.5bn to $2.2bn), that would take Xbox's revenue to $25.3bn. PlayStation revenue last year was $25.04bn, a portion of that will be from the 30% store cut on mtx/digital sales of Activision titles. So yes, whilst this comparison is loose and missing context, you're wrong for suggesting that long term this could not spell a dramatic shift in market share dominance.
Don't forget, most of Bethesda's new games post acquisition, have not even been released yet. Same for Activision for some time. You have to look at these things in terms of the impact they may have 5-10+ years from now, not just today.
That'd honestly be a waste of money for Sony. SE is already into their hands, more or less.
I work nights and woke up in the middle of sleep to see it so I was basically this.
Wouldn't matter. That affects Nintendo more than MS. For all intents and purposes their biggest franchises are looked upon as Sony exclusives anyway.
Great. Awesome. But, it's okay, because game pass & good guy Phil😑🥴You know what's now SUPER wierd about all of this?
If Microsoft continues to make COD titles for PlayStation, think about what that means for future generations. Sony would be sending Microsoft early dev kits and giving them insight into how they are architecting their next console. That's….that's something I think Sony will not be thrilled about doing. That's almost like legal corporate espionage
They should be fine. Sony is investing HEAVILY into 1st party. If you own that system you are in good shape even if they don't believe in a day 1 subscription model.For now, Sony is far from being hurt. Microsoft shifted from being a weak competitor to a strong one, but as far as we can't tell it's not really affecting Sony's bottom line.
THAT would be anti-trust. They would have a monopoly on gaming that isnt Nintendo.
Thats now how it works, man. Again, why is it a bad thing to have options? I shouldn't have to be tied to a specific ecosystem to enjoy specific contentBuying a game system is a bit of a gamble, unfortunately. Games that you were counting on can turn out to be duds, cancelled, or tied to another platform via an exclusivity deal.
that's why Gamepass and cloud is so important. Once you remove the $600 box (a lot of money for most consumers) from the equation then this kind of thing that has plagued gaming since day one is gone.
It's all smoke and mirrors man, trust me. Don't fall for it because it's strictly business right now to keep things professional. They pushed Bill Gates out for what he did so Bobby doesn't have long.
Finally he can get back to the arenaTroy Baker is so glad this happened so everyone can stop talking about him.
They only make that image better.Funny, I remember a time when MS was laughed at for just being a dudebro shooter platform.
The only way Sony could match this is by buying Nintendo or EA.Pretty much. Could prompt MS to also respond by buying someone else just to show they will respond to any buy out retaliation, lol. This is not a great situation for Sony any way you slice it.