Thread backfire lol
If anything MS gets too much credit for this, and they use that credit to dodge a ton of legitimate criticisms about the way they continue to handle this generation
bingo
Thread backfire lol
If anything MS gets too much credit for this, and they use that credit to dodge a ton of legitimate criticisms about the way they continue to handle this generation
It guess it does but it feels like an afterthought and nowhere close to the quality of Gamepass in both first and third party.
Sony will continue to evolve PS Now and we should expect some changes to the service to go along with the PS5. Will they put all first party titles day 1 on the service? Very doubtful. Will they put some first party titles on it and maybe toss the heavy hitters on the service several months to a year later? That's a bit more likely.
Thread backfire lol
If anything MS gets too much credit for this, and they use that credit to dodge a ton of legitimate criticisms about the way they continue to handle this generation
Yes, because MS wants to be integrated in everything like Google is. This was gonna happen sooner or later.Would Gamepass exist though if the One had stronger console sales out of the gate and didn't require MS to find new revenue streams for their games division?
Yes, because MS wants to be integrated in everything like Google is. This was gonna happen sooner or later.
Yeah no way to tell for sure. A company in desperation mode is good for us, I guess.I don't doubt that. I just have to wonder more I guess if the offerings would be as robust, such as day one for first party, or the pricing being as cheap as it often is since Gamepass is on sale almost all the time.
Yes, because MS wants to be integrated in everything like Google is. This was gonna happen sooner or later.
Ps Now's downloadable library is significantly larger than all of Game Pass. All games are streamable to multiple platforms, and the total library is over 800 games.
The only significant difference is that Microsoft's first party games have so little value compared to Sony's first party games that they can be tossed into a subscription service without fear of enormous losses.
Telling Sony to put their AAA 1st party on PS Now day one is like telling marvel to release Endgame on Disney+ first day..
Why do this if you know enough people are willing to pay for it?
They really aren't. Not even close actually.Sony already has it with PS Now. Their third party offering (even when just considering the ps4 downloadable titles rather than include the streaming ps3 titles) is actually very comparable to GamePass.
Actually they are.
Ha! They can't all be home runs.
I'd wager all MS 1st party games are just as costly to make as anything Sony puts out and MS multiplayer games being far bigger then anything Sony can offer, and despite that they're on subscription day 1, so that is a sizable amount of value that others do not provide.
Because GP increases sales for games that arnt flat out shit (CD3), this has been reported by MS.
People need to realize that if Sony could make more money doing what Microsoft does with Game Pass, they would probably do it in a heartbeat.
People need to realize that if Sony could make more money doing what Microsoft does with Game Pass, they would probably do it in a heartbeat.
Yeah, I believe that even MS doesn't know whether gp will make them more money in 3 years or so. I wonder why they don't release game pass numbers.People need to realize that if Sony could make more money doing what Microsoft does with Game Pass, they would probably do it in a heartbeat.
Been saying this for a long time. The same way Disney puts out Marvel and Star wars movies to stream 6 months after release because they get crazy high sales at release. If Sony does anything, it'll be this.Sony will continue to evolve PS Now and we should expect some changes to the service to go along with the PS5. Will they put all first party titles day 1 on the service? Very doubtful. Will they put some first party titles on it and maybe toss the heavy hitters on the service several months to a year later? That's a bit more likely.
Thread backfire lol
If anything MS gets too much credit for this, and they use that credit to dodge a ton of legitimate criticisms about the way they continue to handle this generation
Where's the 3P games on PSNOW that match the value of Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider or Just Cause 4 on Gamepass?
Lol What do their 1st/2nd party offerings have to do with how they handle online services, their OS, and subscriptions? They can be weak in one area while being rightly praised for excelling in another, as odd of a concept that may be for youYup. People fawn over Microsoft for this thing almost no games get released. Reminds me a lot about how people prised ms for adding more services to the Xbox os and I was like "ok, I bought a console to play games not to get a new app on the os"
I'm talking about overall breadth and variety. Not a select few. If we were talking about which service tends to have the more recent big name third party titles, then sure Gamepass takes that crown.Where's the 3P games on PSNOW that match the value of Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider or Just Cause 4 on Gamepass?
So the number of games.I'm talking about overall breadth and variety. Not a select few. If we were talking about which service tends to have the more recent big name third party titles, then sure Gamepass takes that crown.
not just number of games, I'd say the average quality of games offered on both service is comparable as well. More recent =/= better either in terms of quality btw.
People need to realize that if Sony could make more money doing what Microsoft does with Game Pass, they would probably do it in a heartbeat.
Microsoft has an angel in Phil Spencer steering the ship. Thanks to him we'll probably see Banjo Kazooie in Smash. He's an open minded and gamer-centric leader. Crackdown 3 and Sea of Thieves available for free on launch through Gamepass is just insane - show me an offer that good from the other console makers.
Sony has completely descended into arrogance so I don't know or care if they'll implement a service as generous as Gamepass but it's not bloody likely. Don't even mention Nintendo and online in the same sentence.
Telling Sony to put their AAA 1st party on PS Now day one is like telling marvel to release Endgame on Disney+ first day..
Why do this if you know enough people are willing to pay for it?
Okay so for starters you can't equate a movie that makes most of its money in theaters And is a wholly different experience in theaters to a game. Stop.
You can mitigate what you'd "lose" being day one on PS now. Offer enticing collectors editions, offer season pass bundles, do early release ultimate editions. It's not difficult. Plus the game is still gonna sell. People like to own things. Forza Horizon 4 ultimate charted on NPD even though it was on Gamepass. Some of y'all act like Sony has Nintendo level IP. Spider-Man is already $40 not even a year later. BOTW is still $60 still selling. Mario Odyssey still $60 still selling. When your first party titles are still selling at full price 2 years later....then we can talk about devaluing using a subscription service. This doesn't make sense for Nintendo, Sony imo has little to lose if a thing.
Plenty of Sony's IPs have become incredibly successful. Maybe their highest selling games don't reach Nintendo's sales heights but they've begun to match Nintendo nowadays and so would have plenty to lose from putting their high profile titles in something like GamePass early onOkay so for starters you can't equate a movie that makes most of its money in theaters And is a wholly different experience in theaters to a game. Stop.
You can mitigate what you'd "lose" being day one on PS now. Offer enticing collectors editions, offer season pass bundles, do early release ultimate editions. It's not difficult. Plus the game is still gonna sell. People like to own things. Forza Horizon 4 ultimate charted on NPD even though it was on Gamepass. Some of y'all act like Sony has Nintendo level IP. Spider-Man is already $40 not even a year later. BOTW is still $60 still selling. Mario Odyssey still $60 still selling. When your first party titles are still selling at full price 2 years later....then we can talk about devaluing using a subscription service. This doesn't make sense for Nintendo, Sony imo has little to lose if a thing.
To be fair, Microsoft's overall output this gen has been rather lackluster so I can see why they're being a bit dismissive but, yeah, even so, I think there's plenty of signs that their output will be much better going forward so something like Crackdown 3 shouldn't be what we're looking towards as an example of Microsoft's bestIt's a little odd to keep hearing people use Crackdown 3 as the metric to good 1st party games on the service. Not only will future 1st party show up there from the studios MS has acquired, decent 3rd party offerings are also there, as well as not ignoring indies. It's truly a service built for the gamer.