It's almost as if abuse leaves people traumatized and living in fear or something.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Michael Jackson estate attacks 'lurid' documentary
- Thread starter Carnby
- Start date
- Status
I guess, but we aren't talking about two denial of events from years ago. The denials were very far apart. Just to make myself clear, from the documentary, I do believe that he is guilty.
Then you must believe an abuse victim can lie for his/her abuser.
You didn't need to bump an old thread to do that. There's at least two other active MJ threads.
extremely impressive that you managed to add 10 years to the commonly cited number (which is also bullshit)
I do, but I can also see why people who are a defender can use the double denial years apart as a way to justify their doubt. Innocent until proven guilty right? He was "proven" innocent once and settled out of court for the other.
Last edited:
Defending him should be a ban on this forum. Fuck anyone that supports a child molester with bogus information they find on MJ fan forums
George Zimmerman was acquitted in court despite strong evidence against him.
The fact that scumbags use "Wade Robson can't be trusted because he defended MJ under oath once" as a legitimate defense without realizing how mind numbingly stupid they sound sure is something.
Courts don't issue "proven innocent" verdicts. If there is even a sliver of reasonable doubt, defense lawyers instruct juries that they must return a not guilty verdict.
Some of the replies in this thread are pretty disgusting.
Keep defending a pedophile only because you like his music.
MJ was a fraud. He duped millions into thinking he was an angel.
Keep defending a pedophile only because you like his music.
MJ was a fraud. He duped millions into thinking he was an angel.
Yea, but he also didn't go through 2 trials over the course of nearly 10 years.
It's more the multiple times part. I agree that the courts are not infallible. However, I don't automatically assume every court decision is incorrect, just because I don't agree with the outcome.
It's seems wild to me that the other thread was locked given the word of mouth on this thing is still spreading rapidly. "The discussion has run its course" has always been a bad reason to lock threads. Like, for whom has it run it's course? We don't all live here.
I love how everyone in here is looking at me as a MJ fanboy. I thought that dude did it back in the 90's I had and still have no doubt in my mind the dude is a pedo. But I can see why people defend him still.
Edit: Proven Innocent was a bad phrase. I'll put quotes around and I didn't mean it as a solid fact.
Edit: Proven Innocent was a bad phrase. I'll put quotes around and I didn't mean it as a solid fact.
Jackson didn't go through two trials. He forked out more than $20m to 86 the Chandler situation.
You're cool with people defending him for abusing and grooming children?
You went to bat for MJ (a pedophile) and his fans (people who have denied his doings and sending death threats to his victims) voluntarily, my dude.
- Status